IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/resrep/v1i18y2015p72-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods of the prevention of conflict in the family business - the case study (Sposoby zapobiegania destrukcyjnym konfliktom w firmie rodzinnej – studium przypadku)

Author

Listed:
  • Mateusz Kabut

    (Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydzial Zarzadzania)

Abstract

The characteristic attribute of family companies is that they closely connect two areas of human life – family and work. This specific connection can be source of strength and the success of company, but at the same time is the cause of many problems. Example of such threat is high risk of destructive conflict. The purpose of this article was to determine how the risk is limited in practice by family businesses that achieve success. Based on a case study of one such company author established the following possible solutions: clear and consistently adhered rules on the distribution of profit; making sure that members of the family do not occupy equivalent positions of leadership and support for family members in establishing and running their own businesses. On this basis it can be concluded that the broad institutional factors in the examined case played a key role.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateusz Kabut, 2015. "Methods of the prevention of conflict in the family business - the case study (Sposoby zapobiegania destrukcyjnym konfliktom w firmie rodzinnej – studium przypadku)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(18), pages 72-82.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:1:i:18:y:2015:p:72-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sim.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/6_m_kabut.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franz W. Kellermanns & Kimberly A. Eddleston, 2004. "Feuding Families: When Conflict Does a Family Firm Good," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(3), pages 209-228, May.
    2. CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE)., 2014. "Gender strategy," IWMI Books, Reports H046341, International Water Management Institute.
    3. CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE), 2014. "Gender strategy," IWMI Books, International Water Management Institute, number 208758.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Emma, 2017. "Performing colonisation: The manufacture of Black female bodies in tourism research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 95-104.
    2. Małgorzata Pańkowska & Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz, 2015. "Conceptualization of prosumption system architecture in e-health," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 38, pages 425-436.
    3. Lucifora, Claudio & Vigani, Daria, 2016. "What If Your Boss Is a Woman? Work Organization, Work-Life Balance and Gender Discrimination at the Workplace," IZA Discussion Papers 9737, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Chen, Zhuoqiong (Charlie) & Ong, David & Segev, Ella, 2017. "Heterogeneous risk/loss aversion in complete information all-pay auctions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 23-37.
    5. Barlow, Euan & Tezcaner Öztürk, Diclehan & Revie, Matthew & Akartunalı, Kerem & Day, Alexander H. & Boulougouris, Evangelos, 2018. "A mixed-method optimisation and simulation framework for supporting logistical decisions during offshore wind farm installations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 894-906.
    6. Jetter, Michael & Walker, Jay K., 2015. "Game, set, and match: Do women and men perform differently in competitive situations?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 96-108.
    7. Horio, Masayuki & Shigeto, Sawako & Ii, Ryota & Shimatani, Yukihiro & Hidaka, Masato, 2015. "Potential of the ‘Renewable Energy Exodus’ (a mass rural remigration) for massive GHG reduction in Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 623-632.
    8. Charlotte M. Karam & Fida Afiouni, 2021. "Career constructions and a feminist standpoint on the meaning of context," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 672-700, March.
    9. Nchanji, Eileen Bogweh & Chagomoka, Takemore & Bellwood-Howard, Imogen & Drescher, Axel & Schareika, Nikolaus & Schlesinger, Johannes, 2023. "Land tenure, food security, gender and urbanization in Northern Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Ellwood, Sheila & Greenwood, Margaret, 2016. "Accounting for heritage assets: Does measuring economic value ‘kill the cat’?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Barteková, Eva & Kemp, René, 2016. "National strategies for securing a stable supply of rare earths in different world regions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 153-164.
    12. Drago, Carlo & Ginesti, Gianluca & Pongelli, Claudia & Sciascia, Salvatore, 2018. "Reporting strategies: What makes family firms beat around the bush? Family-related antecedents of annual report readability," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 142-150.
    13. Angela Dettori & Michela Floris, 2023. "Improving continuity by simplifying the structure of family firms: a replication study," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 635-660, June.
    14. Del Bosco, Barbara & Cristina Bettinelli, 2020. "How Do Family SMEs Control Their Investments Abroad? The Role of Distance and Family Control," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 1-35, February.
    15. Yan Ling & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2010. "The Effects of Family Firm Specific Sources of TMT Diversity: The Moderating Role of Information Exchange Frequency," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 322-344, March.
    16. Melanie Richards, 2023. "When do Non-financial Goals Benefit Stakeholders? Theorizing on Care and Power in Family Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(2), pages 333-351, May.
    17. Conrad Wiedeler & Nadine Kammerlander, 2021. "Learning the ropes of entrepreneurship: understanding internal corporate venturing for family firms from an entrepreneurial learning perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 669-703, April.
    18. Franz W. Kellermanns & Tim Barnett, 2008. "Commentary: What Were They Thinking? The Role of Family Firm Mental Models on Threat Recognition," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(6), pages 999-1006, November.
    19. Jiří Hnilica & Lorraine M. Uhlaner & Ondřej Machek & Ales Kubíček & Martin Lukeš & Martin Jurek & Petra Štamfestová, 2019. "The Role of Responsible Ownership and Family in Privately Held Firms with Multiple Owners: Preliminary Findings from the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(5), pages 1-17.
    20. Salvatore Sciascia & Pietro Mazzola & Joseph Astrachan & Torsten Pieper, 2012. "The role of family ownership in international entrepreneurship: exploring nonlinear effects," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 15-31, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    conflict; family business; family business problems;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:1:i:18:y:2015:p:72-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.