Structural Breaks and the Normality of Stock Returns
This paper attempts to explain the distribution of actual stock index returns using a mixture of the normal distributions model. This paper first defines the concept of structural breaks and derives a special form of structural breaks under the normality framework. It then applies the derived methodology to the monthly returns of the Swiss stock index to confirm whether the observed non-normality of stock returns can be explained with the derived model. Empirical results provide evidence that the entire period consists of three or four sub-periods in which different normal distributions exist. To check the statistical power of the model, this study generates random data from the normal distributions. Simulation results support the statistical power of the new methodology, and indicate the possibility that, despite being a seemingly non-normal test statistic for the entire data set, the underlying distribution is made up of a mixture of normal distributions.
Volume (Year): 140 (2004)
Issue (Month): II (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: c/o SNB/BNS, Börsenstrasse 15, PO Box 2800, CH-8022 Zürich|
Phone: +41 58 631 32 34
Web page: http://www.sjes.ch
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Jarque, Carlos M. & Bera, Anil K., 1980. "Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 255-259.
- Kim, Dongcheol & Kon, Stanley J, 1996. "Sequential Parameter Nonstationarity in Stock Market Returns," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 103-131, March.
- Blattberg, Robert C & Gonedes, Nicholas J, 1974. "A Comparison of the Stable and Student Distributions as Statistical Models for Stock Prices," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(2), pages 244-280, April.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ses:arsjes:2004-ii-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Steiner)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.