IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sek/jijoss/v8y2019i2p108-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Data Collection in Facility Programming: The Subject-Object Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Lubomir Popov

    (Bowling Green State University)

  • Franklin Goza

    (University of Wisconsin-Whitewater)

Abstract

This study presents a framework designed to enable facility programming scholars to more easily handle the extremely large amounts of information they typically utilize, to guide the development of their research designs and procedures, and to suggest process structure. This framework?s development was informed by both Activity Theory and Systems Theory and synthesizes knowledge about the most important aspects and layers of the sociospatial realm, articulating those analytical clusters that can be used as guides for developing programmatic research designs. The framework created is general enough to cover a wide variety of building types and programming situations. It is also flexible enough to be modified in multiple ways, including the possible addition of vast amounts of supplementary detail, to custom fit a specific facility programming project. The idea of creating a flexible guiding framework is based on the notion that in each programmatic situation content must be updated and aligned with specific organizational realities. Although very important to have theoretical support and shared research experience, each facility programming project is different and requires the adaptation of existing knowledge, as well as methodological erudition and proficiency to deal with the idiosyncrasies that emerge; all of which are possible with this framework. As such, this framework is foundational and pliable enough for further adaptation.The essence of this framework is reflected in by a matrix consisting of vertical and horizontal axes. This matrix emphasizes those facets most important to exploring sociospatial structures and relationships. The horizontal axis of the framework is based on an activity model that consists of agents, their goals, activities, necessary conditions, and the built environment. The vertical axis includes three levels or scales for analyzing the social realm: organization, groups and individuals. Each matrix cell provides information that can be used to develop guidelines for developing customized programmatic research designs and instruments. Each of the resulting 15 cells in this matrix is elaborated in detail. We believe that this framework will make significant contributions to the area of facility programming by providing an easily accessible and useful tool to area experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Lubomir Popov & Franklin Goza, 2019. "A Framework for Data Collection in Facility Programming: The Subject-Object Approach," International Journal of Social Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 108-133, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:jijoss:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:108-133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-social-sciences/publication-detail-21929
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-social-sciences/publication-detail-21929?download=7
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tania Ferraro & Leonor Pais & Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, 2015. "Decent work: An aim for all made by all," International Journal of Social Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 4(3), pages 30-42, August.
    2. Frank Blackler, 1993. "Knowledge And The Theory Of Organizations: Organizations As Activity Systems And The Reframing Of Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 863-884, November.
    3. Aya Mohamed Safwat, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Rewriting the Relationship between Business and Society," International Journal of Social Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 87-99, February.
    4. repec:sek:jijoss:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:86-98 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Martin ?iký? & Anna E. Gorokhova & Jana Marie ?afránková, 2019. "Opinions on managing postmillennials by management university students," International Journal of Social Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 8(1), pages 43-54, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Troxler, Peter & Wolf, Patricia, 2017. "Digital maker-entrepreneurs in open design: What activities make up their business model?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 807-817.
    2. Tânia FERRARO & Leonor PAIS & Nuno REBELO DOS SANTOS & João Manuel MOREIRA, 2018. "The Decent Work Questionnaire: Development and validation in two samples of knowledge workers," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 157(2), pages 243-265, June.
    3. Keijo Räsänen & Susan Meriläinen & Raimo Lovio, 1994. "Pioneering descriptions of corporate greening: Notes and doubts on the emerging discussion," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 9-16.
    4. Tania Ferraro & Leonor Pais & Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, 2015. "Decent work: An aim for all made by all," International Journal of Social Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 4(3), pages 30-42, August.
    5. Liubertė Irina, 2019. "On Social Knowledge and Its Empirical Investigation in Contemporary Organisations," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 81(1), pages 21-37, June.
    6. Karikari Timothy Kwakye & Shimin Liu, 2024. "The Effect of Philanthropic Corporate Social Responsibility on Local CSR Awareness: Examining the Role of Corporate Transparency in Ghana," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 33(1), pages 105-122.
    7. Torsten Ringberg & Markus Reihlen, 2008. "Towards a Socio‐Cognitive Approach to Knowledge Transfer," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 912-935, July.
    8. Bernardo Batiz-Lazo & Jorge Gomes & Maria Mendes, 2002. "New Product Development & Management Of Knowledge In Portuguese Higher Education," Industrial Organization 0211019, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Macpherson, Allan & Holt, Robin, 2007. "Knowledge, learning and small firm growth: A systematic review of the evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 172-192, March.
    10. Marta Graça & Leonor Pais & Lisete Mónico & Nuno Rebelo Dos Santos & Tânia Ferraro & Rita Berger, 2021. "Decent Work and Work Engagement: A Profile Study with Academic Personnel," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 917-939, June.
    11. Acosta Reveles, Irma Lorena, 2019. "Brecha de género en la universidad, productivismo y tecnologías de la información [Gender gap in the university, productivism and information technologies]," MPRA Paper 105216, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jul 2019.
    12. Nancy Beauregard & Louise Lemyre & Jacques Barrette, 2015. "The Domains of Organizational Learning Practices: An Agency-Structure Perspective," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Reihlen, Markus & Klaas, Thorsten, 1999. "Individualismus, Holismus und Systemismus: Erörterung metatheoretischer Sichtweisen in den Sozialwissenschaften," Working Paper Series 99, University of Cologne, Department of Business Policy and Logistics.
    14. Paul Vallance, 2011. "Relational and Dialectical Spaces of Knowing: Knowledge, Practice, and Work in Economic Geography," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(5), pages 1098-1117, May.
    15. Chris Carter & Margaret Grieco, 2000. "New Deals, No Wheels: Social Exclusion, Tele-options and Electronic Ontology," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(10), pages 1735-1748, September.
    16. Lubomir Popov & Franklin Goza, 2021. "A Generic Process Model for Sociocultural Data Collection and Decision Making in Facility Programming," International Journal of Social Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 10(2), pages 31-56, September.
    17. Paula Jarzabkowski, 2003. "Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 23-55, January.
    18. Carole Groleau & Christiane Demers & Mireille Lalancette & Marcos Barros, 2012. "From Hand Drawings to Computer Visuals: Confronting Situated and Institutionalized Practices in an Architecture Firm," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 651-671, June.
    19. Paula Jarzabkowski & Julia Balogun, 2009. "The Practice and Process of Delivering Integration through Strategic Planning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 1255-1288, December.
    20. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4638 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Mohammed Ali & Farag Edghiem & Eman Saleh Alkhalifah, 2023. "Cultural Challenges of ERP Implementation in Middle-Eastern Oil & Gas Sector: An Action Research Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 111-140, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    facility programming; theory of facility programming; methodology of programming research; framework for data collection;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:jijoss:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:108-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijoss.iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.