IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/mngsci/y2018i1p62-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Особенности развития региональных экономических систем с моноотраслевой направленностью // Features of the Regional Economic Systems Development with a Mono-Branch Focus

Author

Listed:
  • O. Astafyeva V.

    (Financial University)

  • E. Astafyev V.

    (Ufa State Petroleum Technological University)

  • О. Астафьева В.

    (Финансовый университет при Правительстве РФ)

  • Е. Астафьев В.

    (Уфимский государственный нефтяной технический университет)

Abstract

Subject. The relevance of the study is explained by the need to develop regional economic systems based on the activation of innovative processes and the use of a differentiated approach depending on the level of economic development of the territory.The subject of this study is the regions of the national economy, characterized by a strong branch orientation.Purpose. The author of the article attempts to develop an approach to ensure innovative development of economy on the basis of determining the strategic direction of regions development with an industry focus, by targeting the key parameters of the system. Within the framework of the stated goal solution, the method of analytical hierarchical procedure was used, allowing to decompose the investigated problem and to carry out a paired comparison of the selected development strategies.Methodology. A grouping of indicators was carried out, the dynamics of which can be used to determine the stage of the industry life cycle, dominating in the region. Three strategic vectors of the region development were identified, taking into account the dynamics of innovative processes in the industry and contribution to the region economic development which is dominant in the economic activity, the indicators determining the stage of the industry life cycle were pointed out, the approach to identify strategic development priorities of the regional economy was proposed taking into account the most important factors. There is an approach to the prioritization of regional economic systems development strategies with paired comparisons of alternatives.Results. The calculations allow choosing development strategies for the regional economy development with a mono-branch focus depending on the relative importance of the selected criteria.Conclusions. The formulated provisions can be taken into account in the development of the strategy of the regional economy advanced development by enhancing innovative activity. Предмет. Актуальность исследования объясняется необходимостью развития региональных экономических систем на основе активизации инновационных процессов и использования дифференцированного подхода в зависимости от уровня экономического развития территории. Предметом исследования являются регионы национальной экономики, характеризующиеся ярко выраженной отраслевой направленностью.Цель. В статье предпринята попытка разработать подход к обеспечению инновационного развития экономики на основе определения стратегического вектора развития регионов, характеризующихся отраслевой направленностью, путем целенаправленного воздействия на ключевые параметры системы. В рамках решения поставленной цели был использован метод аналитической иерархической процедуры, позволяющий декомпозировать исследуемую проблему и проводить парное сравнение выделенных стратегий развития.Методология. Проведено группирование показателей, динамика изменений которых может быть использована для определения стадии жизненного цикла отрасли, доминирующей в регионе. Выделены три стратегических вектора развития региона, учитывающих динамику инновационных процессов в отрасли и вклад в экономическое развитие региона доминирующего вида экономической деятельности, выделены показатели определения стадии жизненного цикла отрасли, предложен подход к выявлению приоритетов стратегического развития региональной экономики с учетом наиболее значимых факторов. Представлен подход к определению приоритетности стратегий развития региональных экономических систем на основе проведения попарных сравнений альтернативных вариантов.Результаты. Проведение расчетов позволяет выбирать стратегии развития региональной экономики с моноотраслевой направленностью в зависимости от относительной важности выделенных критериев.Выводы. Сформулированные положения могут быть учтены при разработке стратегии опережающего развития региональной экономики путем активизации инновационной деятельности.

Suggested Citation

  • O. Astafyeva V. & E. Astafyev V. & О. Астафьева В. & Е. Астафьев В., 2018. "Особенности развития региональных экономических систем с моноотраслевой направленностью // Features of the Regional Economic Systems Development with a Mono-Branch Focus," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 8(1), pages 62-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2018:i:1:p:62-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/138/139.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G.A.Untura (untura@ieie.nsc.ru), 2012. "Strategic support for regions: problems in assessing a status of an innovation territory," Journal "Region: Economics and Sociology", Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of RAS, vol. 1.
    2. North, Douglass C., 1989. "Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 17(9), pages 1319-1332, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabre-Madhin, Eleni Z., 2001. "Market institutions, transaction costs, and social capital in the Ethiopian grain market:," Research reports 124, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Marion Payen & Patrick Rondé, 2020. "Culture, Institutions and Economic Growth," Working Papers of BETA 2020-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Neagu Olimpia, 2018. "Is Global Competitiveness Speeding Up the Growth in the EU? A Panel Data Analyis," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 28(4), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Machiko Nissanke, 2015. "A Quest for Institutional Foundations Towards Inclusive Development in Sub-Saharan Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2015-049, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Aggarwal, Rimjhim M., 2006. "Globalization, local ecosystems, and the rural poor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1405-1418, August.
    6. Yochanan Shachmurove, 2012. "Failing Institutions Are at the Core of the U.S. Financial Crisis," PIER Working Paper Archive 12-040, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    7. Klein, Paul-Olivier & Weill, Laurent, 2022. "Bank profitability and economic growth," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 183-199.
    8. Husmann, Christine, 2015. "Transaction Costs on the Ethiopian Formal Seed Market and Innovations for Encouraging Private Sector Investments," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 54(1), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Li, Renyu & Ma, Zhongxin & Chen, Xirong, 2020. "Historical market genes, marketization and economic growth in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 327-333.
    10. Karl Robert L. Jandoc, 2011. "La Liga Filipina: Rizal and institutional change," Philippine Review of Economics, University of the Philippines School of Economics and Philippine Economic Society, vol. 48(2), pages 151-182, December.
    11. Ng, Adam & Dewandaru, Ginanjar & Ibrahim, Mansor H., 2015. "Property rights and the stock market-growth nexus," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 48-63.
    12. Thomas McGregor & Samuel Wills, 2016. "Surfing A Wave Of Economic Growth," OxCarre Working Papers 170, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.
    13. Ryan, Michael P., 2010. "Patent Incentives, Technology Markets, and Public-Private Bio-Medical Innovation Networks in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1082-1093, August.
    14. Beata K. Bierut & Piot Dybka, 2019. "Institutional determinants of export competitiveness among the EU countries: evidence from Bayesian model averaging," KAE Working Papers 2019-043, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis.
    15. Marshall, Elizabeth P. & Weinberg, Marca, 2012. "Baselines in Environmental Markets: Tradeoffs Between Cost and Additionality," Economic Brief 138922, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Elizabeth Hoffman & Matthew L. Spitzer, 2011. "The Enduring Power of Coase," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 63-76.
    17. Sarıbaş, Hakan, 2010. "The impact of ethic formation on individual income," MPRA Paper 26825, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Thibaut Dort & Pierre-Guillaume Méon & Khalid Sekkat, 2014. "Does investment spur growth everywhere? Not where institutions are weak," Post-Print CEB, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 67(4), pages 482-505, October.
    19. Das Gupta, Monica & Grandvoinnet, Helene & Romani, Mattia, 2000. "State-community synergies in development : laying the basis for collective action," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2439, The World Bank.
    20. Hearn, Bruce & Strange, Roger & Piesse, Jenifer, 2017. "Social elites on the board and executive pay in developing countries: Evidence from Africa," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 230-243.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2018:i:1:p:62-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://managementscience.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.