IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2017i5p118-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Повышение точности прогнозирования интегральных показателей на основе объединения прогнозов // Improving the Prediction Accuracy of the Integral Indicators by the Means of Combining Forecasts

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Frenkel A.

    (Institute of Economics RAS)

  • Natalia Volkova N.

    (Institute of Economics RAS)

  • Anton Surkov A.

    (Institute of Economics RAS)

  • Александр Френкель Адольфович

    (Институт Экономики РАН)

  • Наталия Волкова Николаевна

    (Институт Экономики РАН)

  • Антон Сурков Александрович

    (Институт Экономики РАН)

Abstract

Topic. If we need to predict the future economic development of the state it is necessary to build indicators that could be detectors of economic development. These detectors are integral indices that can describe the overall state of the economy of the state and can warn of turning points in the development in the future. The paper discusses methods of constructing such integral indices and compares them with the rates of industrial production. We provide analysis how to improve the prediction accuracy of the integrated indices through the use of methods of combining forecasts. Combining forecasts proved to be in practice an adequate method of improving the accuracy of forecasting in conditions of uncertainty of choice between individual forecasts.Purpose. The purpose of this work was the construction of three integrated indices describing the general state of the Russian economy: leading, coincident, and lagging, their statistical analysis, calculation of forecast values of the considered indices and the estimation of the influence on prediction accuracy of combining forecasts.Methodology. The study used statistical methods to construct the integrated indices as well as statistical methods of forecasting and the technique of building of combining forecasts.Results. The results of our researches have become integral indices for the Russian economy in the period from 1999 to 2016, and their statistical comparison with observed rates of industrial production. This created an opportunity for making the forecast of development of Russian economy for the next year and comparing the forecast results with the actual data for the first four months of 2017. There are built several prediction models which were combining into the overall forecast. Combining forecasts have improved the prediction accuracy.Conclusions. The result of the work allows concluding that the combining forecasts substantially improves forecasting accuracy of integrated indices and allows using the technique of amalgamated forecasts to predict “turning points” in economic development. Предмет. В условиях необходимости предсказания будущего экономического развития государства необходимо построение показателей, которые смогли бы стать индикаторами развития экономики. Такими индикаторами являются интегральные индексы, которые могут описывать общее состояние экономики государства и могут предупредить о поворотных моментах в развитии в будущем. В работе рассматриваются методы построения интегральных индексов и их сравнение с темпами промышленного производства, проводится анализ повышения точности прогнозирования интегральных показателей посредством использования методов объединения прогнозов. Объединение прогнозов зарекомендовало себя на практике как адекватный метод повышения точности прогнозирования в условиях неопределенности выбора между индивидуальными прогнозами.Цель. Целью работы являлось построение трех интегральных индексов, описывающих общее состояние экономики России: лидирующего, совпадающего, запаздывающего, их статистический анализ, а также расчет прогнозных значений рассматриваемых индексов и оценка влияния на точность прогнозирования объединения прогнозов.Методология. В исследовании используются статистические методы построения интегральных индексов, а также статистические методы прогнозирования, методика построения объединенных прогнозов.Результаты. Результатами работы стали интегральные индексы для экономики России во временной промежуток с 1999 по 2016 г. и их статистическое сравнение с темпами промышленного производства. Это позволило сделать прогноз развития экономики России на ближайший год и сравнить результаты прогнозирования с фактическими данными за первые четыре месяца 2017 г. Были построены несколько моделей прогнозирования и произведено их объединение в общий прогноз. Объединение прогнозов позволило улучшить точность прогнозирования.Выводы. По результатам работы можно сделать вывод, что объединение прогнозов существенно повышает точность прогнозирования интегральных показателей и позволяет использовать методику объединения прогнозов для предсказания «поворотных точек» в экономическом развитии.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Frenkel A. & Natalia Volkova N. & Anton Surkov A. & Александр Френкель Адольфович & Наталия Волкова Николаевна & Антон Сурков Александрович, 2017. "Повышение точности прогнозирования интегральных показателей на основе объединения прогнозов // Improving the Prediction Accuracy of the Integral Indicators by the Means of Combining Forecasts," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 21(5), pages 118-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2017:i:5:p:118-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/578/446.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Capistrán, Carlos & Timmermann, Allan, 2009. "Forecast Combination With Entry and Exit of Experts," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 428-440.
    2. Sunil Gupta & Peter C. Wilton, 1987. "Combination of Forecasts: An Extension," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 356-372, March.
    3. Kenneth Wallis, 2011. "Combining forecasts - forty years later," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1-2), pages 33-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartosz Uniejewski & Katarzyna Maciejowska, 2022. "LASSO Principal Component Averaging -- a fully automated approach for point forecast pooling," Papers 2207.04794, arXiv.org.
    2. Rodríguez-Vargas, Adolfo, 2020. "Forecasting Costa Rican inflation with machine learning methods," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    3. Conflitti, Cristina & De Mol, Christine & Giannone, Domenico, 2015. "Optimal combination of survey forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 1096-1103.
    4. Malte Knüppel & Fabian Krüger, 2022. "Forecast uncertainty, disagreement, and the linear pool," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 23-41, January.
    5. Yang, Dazhi & van der Meer, Dennis, 2021. "Post-processing in solar forecasting: Ten overarching thinking tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Katarzyna Maciejowska & Bartosz Uniejewski & Tomasz Serafin, 2020. "PCA Forecast Averaging—Predicting Day-Ahead and Intraday Electricity Prices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Timmermann, Allan, 2006. "Forecast Combinations," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 135-196, Elsevier.
    8. Galvão, Ana Beatriz & Garratt, Anthony & Mitchell, James, 2021. "Does judgment improve macroeconomic density forecasts?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1247-1260.
    9. Weron, Rafał, 2014. "Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1030-1081.
    10. Kajal Lahiri & Huaming Peng & Xuguang Simon Sheng, 2022. "Measuring Uncertainty of a Combined Forecast and Some Tests for Forecaster Heterogeneity," Advances in Econometrics, in: Essays in Honor of M. Hashem Pesaran: Prediction and Macro Modeling, volume 43, pages 29-50, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    11. Caldeira, João F. & Moura, Guilherme V. & Santos, André A.P., 2016. "Predicting the yield curve using forecast combinations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 79-98.
    12. João F. Caldeira & Guilherme V. Moura & Francisco J. Nogales & André A. P. Santos, 2017. "Combining Multivariate Volatility Forecasts: An Economic-Based Approach," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 247-285.
    13. Colino, Evelyn V. & Irwin, Scott H. & Garcia, Philip & Etienne, Xiaoli, 2012. "Composite and Outlook Forecast Accuracy," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 37(2), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Federico Bassetti & Roberto Casarin & Francesco Ravazzolo, 2019. "Density Forecasting," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS59, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    15. Christopher G. Gibbs, 2017. "Forecast combination, non-linear dynamics, and the macroeconomy," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 63(3), pages 653-686, March.
    16. Björn Fastrich & Peter Winker, 2014. "Combining Forecasts with Missing Data: Making Use of Portfolio Theory," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 44(2), pages 127-152, August.
    17. von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Hommel, Ulrich & Prokesch, Tobias & Wohlenberg, Holger, 2016. "Testing weighting approaches for forecasting in a Group Wisdom Support System environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4081-4094.
    18. Blanc, Sebastian M. & Setzer, Thomas, 2016. "When to choose the simple average in forecast combination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3951-3962.
    19. Dan Zhu & Qingwei Wang & John Goddard, 2022. "A new hedging hypothesis regarding prediction interval formation in stock price forecasting," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 697-717, July.
    20. Davide Pettenuzzo & Francesco Ravazzolo, 2016. "Optimal Portfolio Choice Under Decision‐Based Model Combinations," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), pages 1312-1332, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2017:i:5:p:118-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.