IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v29y2025i3p275-292.html

Are Green Policies Healthy for Stock Market? Evidence from Bombay Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Mahesh Dahal
  • Joy Das

Abstract

The present study examined the impact of the green policies announced during 2014 to 2020 on securities prices of firms constituting BSE Industrial index, by employing event study methodology. The study grouped the securities and observed that the announcements of the green policies did not impact the securities in group A, B and T. Further, on observing the impact of the individual events, the study found that the events having least binding at firm level has positive impact, whereas events with mandatory binding negatively impacted the returns. At sectoral level, the entire sectors except FMCG, Energy and Consumer Durables welcomed the green policies announcement positively.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahesh Dahal & Joy Das, 2025. "Are Green Policies Healthy for Stock Market? Evidence from Bombay Stock Exchange," Vision, , vol. 29(3), pages 275-292, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:275-292
    DOI: 10.1177/09722629211066284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722629211066284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722629211066284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monasterolo, Irene & de Angelis, Luca, 2020. "Blind to carbon risk? An analysis of stock market reaction to the Paris Agreement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Han, Jianlei & Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Pan, Zheyao (Terry) & Smith, Tom, 2019. "The wealth effects of the announcement of the Australian carbon pricing scheme," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 399-409.
    3. Prayag Lal Yadav & Seung Hun Han & Jae Jeung Rho, 2016. "Impact of Environmental Performance on Firm Value for Sustainable Investment: Evidence from Large US Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 402-420, September.
    4. Vikash Ramiah & Jacopo Pichelli & Imad Moosa, 2015. "Environmental regulation, the Obama effect and the stock market: some empirical results," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(7), pages 725-738, February.
    5. repec:eme:mfppss:mf-12-2018-0635 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Brown, Stephen J. & Warner, Jerold B., 1980. "Measuring security price performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 205-258, September.
    7. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    8. Vikash Ramiah & Thomas Morris & Imad Moosa & Michael Gangemi & Louise Puican, 2016. "The effects of announcement of green policies on equity portfolios: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 31(2), pages 138-155, February.
    9. Gupta, Shreekant & Goldar, Bishwanath, 2005. "Do stock markets penalize environment-unfriendly behaviour? Evidence from India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 81-95, January.
    10. Glen Dowell & Stuart Hart & Bernard Yeung, 2000. "Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(8), pages 1059-1074, August.
    11. Vikash Ramiah & Thomas Morris & Imad Moosa & Michael Gangemi & Louise Puican, 2016. "The effects of announcement of green policies on equity portfolios," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(2), pages 138-155, February.
    12. repec:eme:maj000:maj-08-2014-1065 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Louis H. Amato & Christie H. Amato, 2012. "Environmental Policy, Rankings and Stock Values," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 317-325, July.
    14. Huy Nguyen Anh Pham & Vikash Ramiah & Imad Moosa, 2020. "The effects of environmental regulation on the stock market: the French experience," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3279-3304, December.
    15. Robert D. Klassen & Curtis P. McLaughlin, 1996. "The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(8), pages 1199-1214, August.
    16. Huy Pham & Van Nguyen & Vikash Ramiah & Kashif Saleem & Nisreen Moosa, 2019. "The effects of the Paris climate agreement on stock markets: evidence from the German stock market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(57), pages 6068-6075, December.
    17. Christainsen, Gregory B. & Haveman, Robert H., 1981. "The contribution of environmental regulations to the slowdown in productivity growth," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 381-390, December.
    18. Ramiah, Vikash & Martin, Belinda & Moosa, Imad, 2013. "How does the stock market react to the announcement of green policies?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1747-1758.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Birindelli, Giuliana & Miazza, Aline & Paimanova, Viktoriia & Palea, Vera, 2023. "Just “blah blah blah”? Stock market expectations and reactions to COP26," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Giuliana Birindelli & Helen Chiappini, 2021. "Climate change policies: Good news or bad news for firms in the European Union?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 831-848, March.
    3. Huy Pham & Van Nguyen & Vikash Ramiah & Priyantha Mudalige & Imad Moosa, 2019. "The Effects of Environmental Regulation on the Singapore Stock Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Sarula Bai & Cheol‐Won Yang, 2025. "How Does the Stock Market React to the Carbon Policy? The Chinese Experience During 2014–2022," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), September.
    5. Nerger, Gian-Luca & Huynh, Toan Luu Duc & Wang, Mei, 2021. "Which industries benefited from Trump environmental policy news? Evidence from industrial stock market reactions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    6. Gunther Capelle-Blancard & Adrien Desroziers & Bert Scholtens, 2021. "Shareholders and the environment: a review of four decades of academic research," Post-Print hal-03526647, HAL.
    7. Ouidad Yousfi & Nadia Loukil, 2024. "Environmental laws in France: What are the effects of the Grenelle laws on firms?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 347-389, June.
    8. Martins, António Miguel & Albuquerque, Bruno & Sardinha, Luís & Moutinho, Nuno, 2025. "2024 U.S. presidential elections: An event study for U.S. and non-U.S. fossil fuel and renewable listed firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Liu, Haiyue & Wang, Yile & Shi, Xiaoshuang & Pang, Lina, 2022. "How do environmental policies affect capital market reactions? Evidence from China's construction waste treatment policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Cañón de Francia, Joaquín & Garcés Ayerbe, Concepción, 2006. "Repercusión económica de la certificación medioambiental ISO 14001," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    11. Joaquín Cañón-de-Francia & Concepción Garcés-Ayerbe, 2009. "ISO 14001 Environmental Certification: A Sign Valued by the Market?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 44(2), pages 245-262, October.
    12. Yassin Denis Bouzzine & Rainer Lueg, 2020. "The contagion effect of environmental violations: The case of Dieselgate in Germany," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3187-3202, December.
    13. Lihua Sun & Chunguang Bai & Joseph Sarkis, 2024. "Reward or punishment? The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulatory intervention on the firm market value," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4004-4023, July.
    14. Hanae Tamechika & Shin’ya Okuda, 2017. "Stock price responses to the eco-points programme for electrical household appliances: evidence from Japan," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(58), pages 5856-5864, December.
    15. Yun Shen & Damien Wallace & Krishna Reddy & Vikash Ramiah, 2022. "An investigation of CEO characteristics on firm performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3563-3607, September.
    16. Fdez-Galiano, Inés Merino & Feria-Dominguez, José Manuel, 2024. "Do ESG disclosures mitigate investors’ reaction on mining disasters? Evidence from Brazil," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 256-267.
    17. Justin Hung Nguyen, 2018. "Carbon risk and firm performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 65-90, February.
    18. Hjort, Ingrid, 2016. "Potential Climate Risks in Financial Markets: A Literature Overview," Memorandum 01/2016, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    19. Guo, Mengmeng & Kuai, Yicheng & Liu, Xiaoyan, 2020. "Stock market response to environmental policies: Evidence from heavily polluting firms in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 306-316.
    20. Yan Jiang & Le Luo, 2018. "Market reactions to environmental policies: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 889-903, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:275-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.