IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v27y2023i2p189-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivations and Constraints of Collaborative Consumption, Testing the Mediating Role of Attitude and nature of Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Saubhagya Bhalla

Abstract

Purpose: The current study aims to analyse the relationship among motivation, constraints and intention to participate in collaborative consumption, with attitude acting as a mediating variable. The study also aims to unravel the role of trust dimension within the context of collaborative consumption. Research methodology: The descriptive research design is applied for the present study. Random sampling techniques including area sampling is applied. Data analysis: Linear regression, approach is applied to analyse the data. Hierarchical multiple regression is used to assess the effects of a moderating variable. Findings: Economic concerns are less important as compared to environmental concerns. Materialistic traits of consumers prevent them from participating in collaborative consumption, and perceived risk also acts as a barrier. Attitude has a very important role in collaborative consumption. Institution-based trust is an impactful independent variable but shows no moderating impact. Implications: Marketers can increase the economic benefits of consumers through discount and loyalty cards. Because environmental concerns have a huge impact on attitude and intention, marketers must emphasize on the sustainability aspect of their offerings. For millennials, the most valuable things in life are the lived experiences instead of possessions (Morgan, 2019). Therefore, marketers must leverage on consumer experiences rather than goods. Most importantly, marketers need to focus on the attitude factor. Moreover, the companies must emphasize on the security of the Internet and must explicitly mention the structural and technological safeguards for promoting trust among consumers. The digital platforms can incorporate various measures that can help in promoting privacy and security of the consumers. Areas such as authentication, encryption and integrity need to be given more attention. Originality/value: The study has filled the gap in the existing literature by examining the mediating role of attitude on the relationship of motivations and constraints and behavioural intentions. The study has also contributed by exploring institution-based trust in collaborative consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Saubhagya Bhalla, 2023. "Motivations and Constraints of Collaborative Consumption, Testing the Mediating Role of Attitude and nature of Trust," Vision, , vol. 27(2), pages 189-201, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:27:y:2023:i:2:p:189-201
    DOI: 10.1177/0972262921989127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972262921989127
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972262921989127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Roos & Rüdiger Hahn, 2019. "Understanding Collaborative Consumption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior with Value-Based Personal Norms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 679-697, September.
    2. Lastovicka, John L, et al, 1999. "Lifestyle of the Tight and Frugal: Theory and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 85-98, June.
    3. Liwei Li & Wei Wang, 2020. "The Effects of Online Trust-Building Mechanisms on Trust in the Sharing Economy: The Perspective of Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Lawson, Stephanie J. & Gleim, Mark R. & Perren, Rebeca & Hwang, Jiyoung, 2016. "Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2615-2623.
    5. Russell Belk, 2007. "Why Not Share Rather Than Own?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 126-140, May.
    6. Joana Torres & Pedro Torres & Mário Augusto, 2019. "The impact of trust and electronic word-of-mouth reviews on purchasing intention," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 37(1), pages 136-151.
    7. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    8. Manchiraju SRIKANT, 2013. "Materialism in consumer behavior and marketing: a review," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 8(2), Summer.
    9. Jaiswal, Deepak & Kant, Rishi, 2018. "Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 60-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentin Clemens & Christopher Albert Sabel & Johann Nils Foege & Stephan Nüesch, 2022. "System Design Choice in the Sharing Economy: How Different Institutional Logics Drive Consumer Perception and Consumers’ Intention to Use Sharing Systems," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 201-234, June.
    2. Yanwen Ruan & Yingjiao Xu & Hanna Lee, 2022. "Consumer Motivations for Luxury Fashion Rental: A Second-Order Factor Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Kang, Jingoo & Kang, Minwook, 2022. "Durable goods as commitment devices under quasi-hyperbolic discounting," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Edoardo Beretta & Giulia Miniero & Francesco Ricotta, 2021. "Consumers’ Journey between Liquid and Solid Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Ni, Shaowen, 2021. "Collaborative consumption in China: An empirical investigation of its antecedents and consequences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Anne Bäro & Felix Toepler & Timo Meynhardt & Vivek K. Velamuri, 2022. "Participating in the sharing economy: The role of individual characteristics," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3715-3735, December.
    7. Ebru Tumer Kabadayi & Nilsah Cavdar Aksoy & Nihal Yazici & Alev Kocak Alan, 2022. "Airbnb as a sharing economy-enabled digital service platform: The power of motivational factors and the moderating role of experience," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(3), pages 748-771, May.
    8. Francesco Testa & Gaia Pretner & Roberta Iovino & Guia Bianchi & Sara Tessitore & Fabio Iraldo, 2021. "Drivers to green consumption: a systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4826-4880, April.
    9. Wang, Hong & Ma, Baolong & Bai, Rubing & Zhang, Lin, 2021. "The unexpected effect of frugality on green purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    10. Huan-Ming Chuang & Chen-Chia Chuang, 2023. "The Effects of Experienced Utility and PEEIM on the Purchase Intention of Cross-Border E-Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Bhardwaj, Seema & Sreen, Naman & Das, Manish & Chitnis, Asmita & Kumar, Sushant, 2023. "Product specific values and personal values together better explains green purchase," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Nguyen, Stephanie & Didi Alaoui, Mohamed & Llosa, Sylvie, 2020. "When interchangeability between providers and users makes a difference: The mediating role of social proximity in collaborative services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 506-515.
    13. Marco Pichierri & Daniele Scarpi & Gabriele Pizzi, 2018. "To buy or to rent? An experimental study on the antecedents of consumers? acquisition-mode decisions," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 63-92.
    14. Moon-Yong Kim & Minhee Son, 2021. "What Determines Consumer Attitude toward Green Credit Card Services? A Moderated Mediation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Saubhagya Bhalla, 2021. "Testing the Motivations and Constraints of Collaborative Consumption: An Empirical Analysis of Disruptive Innovative Business Model," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 146-157, June.
    16. Jiang Jiang & Rui Feng & Eldon Y. Li, 2021. "Uncovering the Providers’ Continuance Intention of Participation in the Sharing Economy: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Małecka, Agnieszka & Mitręga, Maciej & Mróz-Gorgoń, Barbara & Pfajfar, Gregor, 2022. "Adoption of collaborative consumption as sustainable social innovation: Sociability and novelty seeking perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 163-179.
    18. Joseph A. Cazier & Benjamin B. M. Shao & Robert D. St. Louis, 2007. "Sharing information and building trust through value congruence," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 515-529, November.
    19. Cheng, Junjun & Chen, Bo & Huang, Zihang, 2023. "Collective-based ad transparency in targeted hotel advertising: Consumers’ regulatory focus underlying the crowd safety effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Domingo Gil-Giménez & Gladys Rolo-González & Ernesto Suárez & Gabriel Muinos, 2021. "The Influence of Environmental Self-Identity on the Relationship between Consumer Identities and Frugal Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:27:y:2023:i:2:p:189-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.