IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v22y2018i3p243-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discovering the Motives to Browse Internet among MBA Students: An Interpretivist Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Usman Naeem
  • Muhammad Kashif

Abstract

This study aims to discover motives to browse Internet among MBA students from Pakistan to understand its role to facilitate student leaning in business schools. The data is collected by means of focus groups and Facebook posts to discover motives to browse Internet. Thematic analysis is performed to analyse the data which includes recording, coding, and development of emergent themes. The four motives to browse Internet which are: Communication, Career Management, Information seeking, and Academic performance. The study is unique in two aspects. First, the data triangulation is achieved by methodological advancement to explore the motives behind Internet browsing. Secondly, the business students from a developing Asian country are selected to render some country specific strategies to make productive use of Internet.

Suggested Citation

  • Usman Naeem & Muhammad Kashif, 2018. "Discovering the Motives to Browse Internet among MBA Students: An Interpretivist Investigation," Vision, , vol. 22(3), pages 243-252, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:22:y:2018:i:3:p:243-252
    DOI: 10.1177/0972262918785959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972262918785959
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972262918785959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    2. Porter, Constance Elise & Donthu, Naveen, 2006. "Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 999-1007, September.
    3. Mats Alvesson & Jörgen Sandberg, 2013. "Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 128-152, January.
    4. David Figlio & Mark Rush & Lu Yin, 2013. "Is It Live or Is It Internet? Experimental Estimates of the Effects of Online Instruction on Student Learning," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(4), pages 763-784.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    2. Oh, Haemoon & Jeong, Miyoung & Baloglu, Seyhmus, 2013. "Tourists' adoption of self-service technologies at resort hotels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 692-699.
    3. Jahanmir, Sara F. & Cavadas, Joana, 2018. "Factors affecting late adoption of digital innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 337-343.
    4. Lin, Chiu Hui & Wu, Chih-Wen & Cheng, Yi-Han, 2015. "The empirical study of consumers' loyalty for display technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2260-2265.
    5. Kerstin Pezoldt & Jana Schliewe, 2012. "Akzeptanz von Self-Service-Technologien: State of the Art," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 205-253, March.
    6. Bielefeldt, Jonas & Poelzl, Jana & Herbst, Uta, 2016. "What’s Mine Isn’t Yours – Barriers to Participation in the Sharing Economy," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(1), pages 4-25.
    7. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & J. Sánchez-Fernández, 2018. "A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 25-64, March.
    8. V. Uma Maheswari & Uma Chandrasekaran, 2018. "Buying Insurance Online: Are we there yet?," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 9(2), pages 30-41, May.
    9. Shao, Qinglong & Kostka, Genia, 2023. "The COVID-19 pandemic and deepening digital inequalities in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    10. Teemu Rantanen & Paula Lehto & Pertti Vuorinen & Kirsi Coco, 2018. "The adoption of care robots in home care—A survey on the attitudes of Finnish home care personnel," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1846-1859, May.
    11. Rese, Alexandra & Baier, Daniel & Geyer-Schulz, Andreas & Schreiber, Stefanie, 2017. "How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 306-319.
    12. Brenda Mak & Paul Beckman & Nicole Bohn, 2016. "Perceived Usefulness and Satisfaction of Mobile Phone for Users with Disabilities," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(02), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Yang, Byunghwa & Kim, Youngchan & Yoo, Changjo, 2013. "The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1345-1352.
    14. Martin Vejačka, 2017. "Social Media Marketing in Comparison With Other Forms of Marketing in the Slovak Banking Sector," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 23-38.
    15. Laukkanen, Tommi, 2016. "Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: The case of the Internet and mobile banking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2432-2439.
    16. Brenda Mak & Robert C. Nickerson & Henri Isaac, 2009. "A Model Of Attitudes Towards The Acceptance Of Mobile Phone Use In Public Places," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 305-326.
    17. Julian M. Müller, 2019. "Comparing Technology Acceptance for Autonomous Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Car Sharing—A Study across Europe, China, and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Iaia, Lea & Leonelli, Simona & Masciarelli, Francesca & Christofi, Michael & Cooper, Sir Cary, 2022. "The malevolent side of masstige consumers’ behavior: The role of dark triad and technology propensity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 954-966.
    19. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    20. Nguyen Hong Quan & Nguyen Thi Binh & Bui Thi Ly, 2022. "Impact of smart locker use on customer satisfaction of online shoppers in Vietnam," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:22:y:2018:i:3:p:243-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.