IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vikjou/v43y2018i2p77-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Testing of the Resilience at Work Scale Using Indian Sample

Author

Listed:
  • Parul Malik
  • Pooja Garg

Abstract

Executive Summary With incessant global competition, technological innovations, organizational restructuring, and turbulent business environment, contemporary organizations need resilient employees, who in turn are capable to face unprecedented changes and adapt successfully to challenging roles, tasks, and situations ( Shin, Taylor, & Seo, 2012 ). Consequently, this necessitates a validated employee-centric measure of resilience for assisting the organizations in fostering and measuring employee resilience development, which would enable employees to meet the challenges and growing work demands ( Hodliffe, 2014 , The development and validation of the employee resilience scale (EmpRes): The conceptualisation of a new model (Doctoral dissertation), New Zealand: University of Canterbury; Masten, 2001 , American Psychologist , 56 (3), 227; Winwood, Colon, & McEwen, 2013 , Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine , 55 (10), 1205–1212). To address this gap, the study assessed the psychometric properties of the ‘resilience at work’ (RAW) scale. The study sample comprised employees working in IT organizations operating in the Indian National Capital Region (NCR). The study is based on cross-sectional questionnaire responses from 546 Indian employees working in the IT industry. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the factorial validity followed by an analysis of convergent and discriminant validity of the scale items. To evaluate the convergent validity, this study utilized three standard criteria which are standard factor loadings, composite reliability, and average variance extracted (AVE) ( Anderson & Gerbing, 1988 , Psychological Bulletin , 103 (3), 411–423). In addition, the study tested the nomological validity of the RAW scale. The study results reveal that the RAW scale exhibits high reliability and the results of CFA validated the seven-factor model of the RAW scale. The results of CFA and reliability of the scale demonstrate that the scale can be utilized to develop and measure resilience among Indian employees. Furthermore, the results of the nomological validity exhibit a significant relationship between resilience and work engagement. This study offers significant implications for both researchers and HRD practitioners. The study provides preliminary evidence for the psychometric properties of the scale in t he Indian organizational context and signifies its potential for the cross-cultural implementations. The RAW scale, thence, can be utilized by organizations as a validated tool for measuring and developing resilience among employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Parul Malik & Pooja Garg, 2018. "Psychometric Testing of the Resilience at Work Scale Using Indian Sample," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 43(2), pages 77-91, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vikjou:v:43:y:2018:i:2:p:77-91
    DOI: 10.1177/0256090918773922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0256090918773922
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0256090918773922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuntz, Joana R. C. & Näswall, Katharina & Malinen, Sanna, 2016. "Resilient Employees in Resilient Organizations: Flourishing Beyond Adversity," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 456-462, June.
    2. Britt, Thomas W. & Shen, Winny & Sinclair, Robert R. & Grossman, Matthew R. & Klieger, David M., 2016. "How Much Do We Really Know About Employee Resilience?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 378-404, June.
    3. Wolfson, Natalie E. & Mulqueen, Casey, 2016. "Advancing Employee Resilience Research: Additional Thoughts," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 452-456, June.
    4. King, Danielle D., 2016. "The Untapped Potential in Employee Resilience: Specific Recommendations for Research and Practice," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 405-411, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sayoni Santra & V. N. Giri, 2019. "Role of Career Adaptability and Its Resources in Predicting Vocational Attitudes of Indian IT Professionals," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(2), pages 168-192, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galina Biedenbach & Thomas Biedenbach & Peter Hultén & Veronika Tarnovskaya, 2022. "Organizational resilience and internal branding: investigating the effects triggered by self-service technology," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 420-433, July.
    2. Hassan Danaeefard & Atiye Sedaghat & Seyed Hosein Kazemi & Ahmadali Khaef Elahi, 2022. "Investment Areas to Enhance Public Employee Resilience during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evidence from Iran," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 837-855, September.
    3. Martin Hoegl & Silja Hartmann, 2021. "Bouncing back, if not beyond: Challenges for research on resilience," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 456-464, September.
    4. Croucher, Richard & Glaister, Keith W. & Rizov, Marian & Rofcanin, Yasin & Wood, Geoffrey, 2020. "Challenges and Resilience: Managers’ perceptions of firm performance following M&As," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 69(4), pages 1470-1505.
    5. Diego R. Toubes & Noelia Araújo-Vila & Arthur Filipe Araújo & José Antonio Fraiz-Brea, 2023. "Resilience and individual competitive productivity: the role of age in the tourism industry," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Ania A Drzewiecka, 2023. "From Human Doing to Human Being – The Metacognitive Model for Well-Being Resilience in the Workplace," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(11), pages 1023-1048, November.
    7. Rabindra Kumar Pradhan & Nrusingh Prasad Panigrahy & Lalatendu Kesari Jena, 2021. "Self-Efficacy and Workplace Well-Being: Understanding the Role of Resilience in Manufacturing Organizations," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 9(1), pages 62-76, January.
    8. Jessica M. Nicklin & Emily J. Meachon & Laurel A. McNall, 2019. "Balancing Work, School, and Personal Life among Graduate Students: a Positive Psychology Approach," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(5), pages 1265-1286, November.
    9. Oana Branzei & Ramzi Fathallah, 2023. "The End of Resilience? Managing Vulnerability Through Temporal Resourcing and Resisting," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(3), pages 831-863, May.
    10. Shana Hormann, 2018. "Exploring Resilience: in the Face of Trauma," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 91-104, July.
    11. Kothari, Brianne H. & Chandler, Kelly D. & Waugh, Andrew & McElvaine, Kara K. & Jaramillo, Jamie & Lipscomb, Shannon, 2021. "Retention of child welfare caseworkers: The role of case severity and workplace resources," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Peter G van der Velden & Ruud J A Muffels & Roy Peijen & Mark W G Bosmans, 2019. "Wages and employment security following a major disaster: A 17-year population-based longitudinal comparative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Ali E. Ahmed & Deniz Ucbasaran & Gabriella Cacciotti & Trenton A. Williams, 2022. "Integrating Psychological Resilience, Stress, and Coping in Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review and Research Agenda," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 497-538, May.
    14. Marjolein C. J. Caniëls & Simone M. J. Baaten, 2019. "How a Learning-Oriented Organizational Climate is Linked to Different Proactive Behaviors: The Role of Employee Resilience," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 561-577, June.
    15. Sun Feihan & Granovskaya Olga & Miao Xumei & Ye Chongliang, 2023. "The Effect of Agglomeration Strategy on Rural Resilience from the Perspective of Homestay Tourism Operators," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 67(67), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Bekir Değirmenci, 2022. "The Effect of Job Insecurity on Job Performance During The Covid-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Role of Employee Resilience," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(92), pages 29-46, June.
    17. Dinara Tokbaeva & Leona Achtenhagen, 2023. "Career resilience of female professionals in the male‐dominated IT industry in Sweden: Toward a process perspective," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 223-262, January.
    18. Serres, Coline & Hudon, Marek & Maon, François, 2022. "Social corporations under the spotlight: A governance perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vikjou:v:43:y:2018:i:2:p:77-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.