IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v51y2022i3p963-982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Double Bind of Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Arel-Bundock

Abstract

Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is an influential methodological approach motivated by set theory and boolean logic. QCA proponents have developed algorithms to analyze quantitative data, in a bid to uncover necessary and sufficient conditions where causal relationships are complex, conditional, or asymmetric. This article uses computer simulations to show that researchers in the QCA tradition face a vexing double bind. On the one hand, QCA algorithms often require large data sets in order to recover an accurate causal model, even if that model is relatively simple. On the other hand, as data sets increase in size, it becomes harder to guarantee data integrity, and QCA algorithms can be highly sensitive to measurement error, data entry mistakes, or misclassification.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Arel-Bundock, 2022. "The Double Bind of Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(3), pages 963-982, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:51:y:2022:i:3:p:963-982
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124119882460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124119882460
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124119882460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:51:y:2022:i:3:p:963-982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.