IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v58y2024i2d10.1007_s11135-023-01687-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-sample test for ambivalent subset relationship in fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Veri

    (University of Zurich
    University of Geneva)

Abstract

In fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), ambivalent subset relationships (ASR), occur when solution term X is in subset relation with the outcome Y and its absence ~ Y, leading to false-positive results. While ASR can be empirically detected in small-N and medium-N cases through in-depth case knowledge, it is challenging to identify them in large-N case designs. QCA parameters such as proportion reduction inconsistency (PRI) and consistency are commonly used to identify simultaneous subset relationships (SSR), but they are not specifically designed to detect ASR. To address this issue, this article introduces the DTS test, a new test based on two-sample statistics. The DTS test identifies distributional convergence between a solution term’s empirical cumulative distribution function (eCDF) and an eCDF of solution formulas with asymptotic ASR characteristics. By comparing empirical solutions’ patterns with spurious artificially built solutions' patterns, the DTS test reduces the risk of causal fallacies in interpreting the empirical results. Overall, the DTS test provides a valuable tool for identifying and addressing potential ASR bias in fsQCA, particularly in large-N case designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Veri, 2024. "Two-sample test for ambivalent subset relationship in fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1235-1253, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01687-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01687-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01687-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-023-01687-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01687-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.