IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v14y1985i2p165-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mistaking Labor Market Effects for Unequal Treatment in Regression Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • EDGAR F. BORGATTA

    (University of Washington)

  • AUDREY BLUMBERG

    (Graduate School, CUNY)

  • ROBERT FOSS

    (New York Telephone Company)

  • JOHN VAN HOEWYK

    (Coopers and Hybrand)

Abstract

Unequal treatment is defined as requiring a more severe test for one person to get a position or reward than for another. It is shown how a changing labor market can generate differences between the average amount of salary paid to men and women in the absence of unequal treatment. It is then demonstrated by generated models how using imperfectly measured independent variables commonly will not take account of the labor market effect in an application of regression analysis. While methodologists appreciate this limitation, it is ignored under particular circumstances. A method is then presented for showing unequal treatment without ambiguity. It is noted that when unequal treatment is not demonstrated by this method, additional procedures may be used to examine alternative ways in which unequal treatment can occur. Data are presented from the City University of New York to illustrate an application of the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgar F. Borgatta & Audrey Blumberg & Robert Foss & John Van Hoewyk, 1985. "Mistaking Labor Market Effects for Unequal Treatment in Regression Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 14(2), pages 165-199, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:14:y:1985:i:2:p:165-199
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124185014002004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124185014002004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124185014002004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur S. Goldberger, 1984. "Reverse Regression and Salary Discrimination," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 19(3), pages 293-318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence M. Kahn, 2000. "The Sports Business as a Labor Market Laboratory," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 75-94, Summer.
    2. Jed L. DeVaro & Jeffrey M. Lacker, 1995. "Errors in variables and lending discrimination," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue Sum, pages 19-32.
    3. Kahn, Lawrence M., 2009. "The Economics of Discrimination: Evidence from Basketball," IZA Discussion Papers 3987, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan & Jann Spiess, 2017. "Machine-Learning Tests for Effects on Multiple Outcomes," Papers 1707.01473, arXiv.org, revised May 2019.
    5. repec:eee:labchp:v:1:y:1986:i:c:p:693-785 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ian W. Li & Paul W. Miller, 2012. "Gender Discrimination in the Australian Graduate Labour Market," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 15(3), pages 167-199.
    7. Edna Schechtman & Shlomo Yitzhaki & Taina Pudalov, 2011. "Gini’s multiple regressions: two approaches and their interaction," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 67-99.
    8. Pearl Judea, 2013. "Linear Models: A Useful “Microscope” for Causal Analysis," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 155-170, June.
    9. Insan Tunali, 2008. "Analysis of Attrition Patterns in the Turkish Household Labor Force Survey, 2000-2002," Working Papers 393, Economic Research Forum, revised 03 Jan 2008.
    10. Raviv Murciano-Goroff, 2022. "Missing Women in Tech: The Labor Market for Highly Skilled Software Engineers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3262-3281, May.
    11. Xi Chen, 2011. "Increasing Returns to Scale in U.S. manufacturing industries: evidence from direct and reverse regression," Working Papers of BETA 2011-11, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    12. Stephen L. Ross, 2003. "What Is Known about Testing for Discrimination: Lessons Learned by Comparing across Different Markets," Working papers 2003-21, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2003.
    13. Arnold de Silva, 1999. "Wage Discrimination Against Natives," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 25(1), pages 65-85, March.
    14. Michael LaCour-Little, 1996. "Application of Reverse Regression to Boston Federal Reserve Data Refutes Claims of Discrimination," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12.
    15. Kapsalis, Constantine, 2020. "Wage Discrimination: Direct vs. Reverse Regression Method," MPRA Paper 103184, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Kapsalis, Constantine, 2010. "Wage discrimination: The case for reverse regression," MPRA Paper 27331, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Lawrence M. Kahn, 1991. "Discrimination in Professional Sports: A Survey of the Literature," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 44(3), pages 395-418, April.
    18. Bell, Alex, 2020. "Job Amenities & Earnings Inequality," MPRA Paper 118516, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Bodvarsson, Orn B. & Partridge, Mark D., 2001. "A supply and demand model of co-worker, employer and customer discrimination," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 389-416, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:14:y:1985:i:2:p:165-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.