IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/soasur/v29y2022i1p23-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Act East through India’s Northeast: Limits of Neoliberal Strategies towards Developing an Underdeveloped Region

Author

Listed:
  • Rubul Patgiri
  • Dilip Gogoi

Abstract

One of the major objectives of the Look East, now rechristened as Act East Policy, of India is to develop the geographically and economically isolated region of Northeast India by economically integrating it with the neighbouring regions of South East Asia through neoliberal economic intervention. In view of this, the present article tries to analyse the rationale of such neoliberal-centric development model for the Northeast India as envisaged under the Look (Act) East Policy, existing gaps in the present policy framework and its impact. It argues that so far, such a strategy has brought very little dividend for the Northeast and may be at odds with some of the existing political, economic and social realities of the region. The article finally concludes by arguing that resources and interests of the region must be protected while trying to expose the region to global market economy for greater economic prosperity.

Suggested Citation

  • Rubul Patgiri & Dilip Gogoi, 2022. "Act East through India’s Northeast: Limits of Neoliberal Strategies towards Developing an Underdeveloped Region," South Asian Survey, , vol. 29(1), pages 23-41, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:soasur:v:29:y:2022:i:1:p:23-41
    DOI: 10.1177/09715231211069954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09715231211069954
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09715231211069954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allan P. O. Williams, 2006. "Impact of Strategies," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Rise of Cass Business School, chapter 13, pages 167-181, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Feng & Jiang, Guohua & Cantwell, John A., 2015. "Subsidiary exploration and the innovative performance of large multinational corporations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 224-234.
    2. Onyema E. Ofoegbu, 2014. "The Role of Knowledge Management on Knowledge Management Perfomance: A Case Study of Some Nigerian Banks," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 53-62, May.
    3. Marius Lux & Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Stefan Lessmann, 2020. "Data driven value-at-risk forecasting using a SVR-GARCH-KDE hybrid," Papers 2009.06910, arXiv.org.
    4. Monirosadat Hosseini & Seyyed Morteza Hashemi Toroujeni, 2017. "From Conventional to Technology-Assisted Alternative Assessment for Effective and Efficient Measurement: A Review of the Recent Trends in Comparability Studies," English Literature and Language Review, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(5), pages 35-45, 05-2017.
    5. Mihaela Păceşilă & Sofia Elena Colesca, 2020. "Insights on Social Responsibility of NGOS," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 311-339, June.
    6. Heinz Hollenstein, 2009. "Characteristics of Foreign R&D Strategies of Swiss Firms: Implications for Policy," Chapters, in: Dominique Foray (ed.), The New Economics of Technology Policy, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Cheatham, Leah P. & Randolph, Karen A. & Boltz, Laura D., 2020. "Youth with disabilities transitioning from foster care: Examining prevalence and predicting positive outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    8. Mumtaz Reina Mendonca, 2016. "Relating Big Five Factor Model to the Acceptance and Use of On-line Shopping," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 89-98, June.
    9. Agranov Agranov & Ahrash Dianat & Larry Samuelson & Leeat Yariv, 2021. "Paying to Match: Decentralized Markets with Information Frictions," Working Papers 273, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    10. Muhammad Irfan & Mohammad Farid Shamsudin & Noor Hadi, 2016. "How Important Is Customer Satisfaction? Quantitative Evidence from Mobile Telecommunication Market," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 1-57, May.
    11. Marco Cucculelli, 2018. "Firm age and the probability of product innovation. Do CEO tenure and product tenure matter?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 153-179, January.
    12. Begoña Garcia Mariñoso & Izabela Jelovac & Pau Olivella, 2011. "External referencing and pharmaceutical price negotiation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(6), pages 737-756, June.
    13. Nuño, Roberto & Coleman, Katie & Bengoa, Rafael & Sauto, Regina, 2012. "Integrated care for chronic conditions: The contribution of the ICCC Framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 55-64.
    14. Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2018. "The direct and indirect effect of cash transfers: the case of Indonesia," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(5), pages 793-807, May.
    15. Preuss, Lutz & Vazquez-Brust, Diego & Yakovleva, Natalia & Foroughi, Hamid & Mutti, Diana, 2022. "When social movements close institutional voids: Triggers, processes, and consequences for multinational enterprises," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    16. Tim Laing & Misato Sato & Michael Grubb & Claudia Comberti, 2013. "Assessing the effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading System," GRI Working Papers 106, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    17. Sandrin, Enrico & Trentin, Alessio & Forza, Cipriano, 2018. "Leveraging high-involvement practices to develop mass customization capability: A contingent configurational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 335-345.
    18. John M. de Figueiredo & Brian Kelleher Richter, 2013. "Advancing the Empirical Research on Lobbying," NBER Working Papers 19698, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Ardito, Lorenzo & Savino, Tommaso, 2018. "Maturity of knowledge inputs and innovation value: The moderating effect of firm age and size," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 190-201.
    20. Shahid Iqbal & Jan Alam & Muhammad Zia-ur Rehman, 2017. "Indian Strategic Economic Tactics and Emergent Challenges for the Developing Countries of the Region," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 2(1), pages 64-72, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:soasur:v:29:y:2022:i:1:p:23-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.