IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v53y2022i5p470-512.html

Improving Environmental Outcomes With Games: An Exploration of Behavioural and Technological Design and Evaluation Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Kristy de Salas
  • Louise Ashbarry
  • Mikaela Seabourne
  • Ian Lewis
  • Lindsay Wells
  • Julian Dermoudy
  • Erin Roehrer
  • Matthew Springer
  • James D. Sauer
  • Jenn Scott

Abstract

Background To overcome the high failure rate of gameful interventions, we need to better understand their design and evaluation strategies to build an evidence-base for best-practice approaches that bring about meaningful change. This systematic review asks: ‘What behavioural and technological design and evaluation theories and approaches are applied in games developed to bring about positive environmental outcomes?’. Method We reviewed 52 papers published between 2015 and 2020 that used gameful interventions to improve behaviour related to environmental outcomes. These papers were analysed to review the behavioural and technical design, and the assessment and evaluation approaches, employed by the intervention designers. Results We found that these publications report on simple aspects of the behavioural and technical design behind the intervention but fail to justify their design choices in terms of theory and evidence. Furthermore, variability across their evaluation approaches and outcomes exists. Discussion This review highlights several systemic flaws in the literature that limit our understanding of gameful interventions in the pro-environmental context. First, based on this review, we cannot be convinced that these interventions were designed according to best practice for intervention design or for technology development. Second, the justification for proposing a gameful intervention is not always clear. Finally, it is unclear whether these interventions are being evaluated based on best practice. Thus, it is not clear that we can draw confident conclusions about evidence-based outcomes of short-term engagement (in structural gamification interventions) or long-term behaviour change (in content gamification and serious game interventions).

Suggested Citation

  • Kristy de Salas & Louise Ashbarry & Mikaela Seabourne & Ian Lewis & Lindsay Wells & Julian Dermoudy & Erin Roehrer & Matthew Springer & James D. Sauer & Jenn Scott, 2022. "Improving Environmental Outcomes With Games: An Exploration of Behavioural and Technological Design and Evaluation Approaches," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(5), pages 470-512, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:5:p:470-512
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781221114160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781221114160
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781221114160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Datu Buyung Agusdinata & Heide Lukosch, 2019. "Supporting Interventions to Reduce Household Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Transdisciplinary Role-Playing Game Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 50(3), pages 359-376, June.
    2. Viswanath Venkatesh & Xiaojun Zhang, 2010. "Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: U.S. Vs. China," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 5-27, January.
    3. Isabel Jaisli & Petra Bättig-Frey & Lea Eymann & Ennio Mariani & Matthias Stucki, 2019. "Scientainment for Sustainability: The Eco-Confessional as a New Approach for Life Cycle Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    4. David I. Waddington & Thomas Fennewald, 2018. "Grim FATE: Learning About Systems Thinking in an In-Depth Climate Change Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(2), pages 168-194, April.
    5. Jason S. Wu & Joey J. Lee, 2015. "Climate change games as tools for education and engagement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 413-418, May.
    6. Francesca Cellina & Dominik Bucher & Francesca Mangili & José Veiga Simão & Roman Rudel & Martin Raubal, 2019. "A Large Scale, App-Based Behaviour Change Experiment Persuading Sustainable Mobility Patterns: Methods, Results and Lessons Learnt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Mulcahy, Rory & Russell-Bennett, Rebekah & Iacobucci, Dawn, 2020. "Designing gamified apps for sustainable consumption: A field study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 377-387.
    8. Chung-Ho Su, 2018. "Exploring Sustainability Environment Educational Design and Learning Effect Evaluation through Migration Theory: An Example of Environment Educational Serious Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, September.
    9. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2019. "Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 210-221.
    10. Amon Rapp & Alessandra Marino & Rossana Simeoni & Federica Cena, 2017. "An ethnographic study of packaging-free purchasing: designing an interactive system to support sustainable social practices," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(11), pages 1193-1217, November.
    11. Janna Hastings & Susan Michie & Marie Johnston, 2020. "Theory and ontology in behavioural science," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 226-226, March.
    12. Lidia Aguiar-Castillo & Alberto Clavijo-Rodriguez & Petra De Saa-Perez & Rafael Perez-Jimenez, 2019. "Gamification as An Approach to Promote Tourist Recycling Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Zhaojun Yang & Xiangchun Kong & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang, 2018. "Switching to Green Lifestyles: Behavior Change of Ant Forest Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fiona van Schaik, 2023. "In-Game Uncertainties and Climate Change Challenges as Identified by Pre-Service Teachers," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(6), pages 680-707, December.
    2. Dernat, Sylvain & Grillot, Myriam & Andreotti, Federico & Martel, Gilles, 2025. "A sustainable game changer? Systematic review of serious games used for agriculture and research agenda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Brendan T. Lawson & Marianna J. Coulentianos & Olivia Mitchell, 2025. "Can We Trust Green Apps? Mapping out 14 Trustworthiness Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lan, Xiaomeng & Song, Baobao, 2025. "The more, the merrier? Investigating the distinct and interaction effects of gamification mechanics in corporate sustainability engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Jiaxing Chen & Guangling Zhang & Qinfang Hu, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Pro-Environment Game and Guilt on Environmentally Sustainable Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Ștefan Boncu & Octav-Sorin Candel & Nicoleta Laura Popa, 2022. "Gameful Green: A Systematic Review on the Use of Serious Computer Games and Gamified Mobile Apps to Foster Pro-Environmental Information, Attitudes and Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Weng Marc Lim & Manish Das & Wamika Sharma & Aastha Verma & Rajeev Kumra, 2025. "Gamification for sustainable consumption: A state‐of‐the‐art overview and future agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1510-1549, January.
    5. Maria Giovina Pasca & Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion & Laura Di Pietro & Maria Francesca Renzi, 2025. "Unveiling the role of gamification in shared mobility services," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 13371-13410, June.
    6. Kristoffer S. Fjællingsdal & Christian A. Klöckner, 2020. "Green Across the Board: Board Games as Tools for Dialogue and Simplified Environmental Communication," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(5), pages 632-652, October.
    7. Qi Ke & Yunhong Gong & Changping Ke, 2025. "Bridging AI literacy and UTAUT constructs: structural equation modeling of AI adoption among Chinese university students," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Aljawharah M. Aldosari & Hala F. Eid & Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen, 2022. "A Proposed Strategy Based on Instructional Design Models through an LMS to Develop Online Learning in Higher Education Considering the Lockdown Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Mostafa Bigdeli & Mahsa Akbari, 2024. "Machine-learning-based Classification of Customers’ Behavioural Model in Instagram," Paradigm, , vol. 28(2), pages 223-240, December.
    10. Léo Revelli, 2025. "Can complementary currencies foster sustainability? A systematic review of the impacts of environmental complementary currencies," Working Papers CEB 25-002, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Siti Nur Diyana Mahmud & Hazrati Husnin & Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, 2020. "Teaching Presence in Online Gamified Education for Sustainability Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Arfi, Wissal Ben & Nasr, Imed Ben & Kondrateva, Galina & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2021. "The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Chen, Hongquan & Zhang, Shuhua & Shao, Bingjia & Zhang, Yong & Zhao, Quanwu, 2026. "Instrumental vs. hedonic Affordances: Examining their impact on repurchase behavior on live commerce platforms through self-determination theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Chen, Xia & Miraz, Mahadi Hasan & Gazi, Md. Abu Issa & Rahaman, Md. Atikur & Habib, Md. Mamun & Hossain, Abu Ishaque, 2022. "Factors affecting cryptocurrency adoption in digital business transactions: The mediating role of customer satisfaction," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    15. Jung-Chieh Lee & Ting Li & Lihui Zhang, 2025. "Environmental concerns and green trust in continuous green fintech use: an expectation-confirmation model with insights from Ant Forest," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Cloos, Janis & Mohr, Svenja, 2022. "Acceptance of data sharing in smartphone apps from key industries of the digital transformation: A representative population survey for Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    17. Noopur Saxena & Navneet Gera & Mayur Taneja, 2023. "An empirical study on facilitators and inhibitors of adoption of mobile banking in India," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2573-2604, December.
    18. Amina Abdinoor & Ulingeta O.L. Mbamba, 2017. "Factors influencing consumers’ adoption of mobile financial services in Tanzania," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1392273-139, January.
    19. Micheline Sabiteka & Xinguo Yu & Chao Sun, 2025. "Toward Sustainable Education: A Contextualized Model for Educational Technology Adoption for Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-44, April.
    20. Katherine Ball & Kirk Jalbert & Lisa Test, 2021. "Making the board: participatory game design for environmental action," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 12-22, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:53:y:2022:i:5:p:470-512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.