IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6444-d1701512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can We Trust Green Apps? Mapping out 14 Trustworthiness Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Brendan T. Lawson

    (Department of Communication and Media, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Marianna J. Coulentianos

    (School of Design and Creative Arts, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Olivia Mitchell

    (School of Arts, Languages and Cultures, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

Abstract

Green apps have emerged as ways users can engage with climate action, covering ventures that plant trees as users search for information (e.g., Ecosia) through to apps that facilitate behaviour change (e.g., United Nation’s AWorld). But how much can these apps be trusted to facilitate long-term engagement with climate action? Setting our research within the literature on trust, we combine expert interviews (n = 20) with the academic literature to outline 14 trustworthiness indicators. Each indicator provides a clear statement about what makes a green app more or less trustworthy. The indicators are grouped into six core categories: going beyond the app, meaningful collective action, designing the app, accessibility and inequality, data, and organisation. In doing so, our indicators speak to a range of research from multiple disciplines. At the same time, they provide a toolkit for users, practitioners, and academics to critically and productively engage with green apps.

Suggested Citation

  • Brendan T. Lawson & Marianna J. Coulentianos & Olivia Mitchell, 2025. "Can We Trust Green Apps? Mapping out 14 Trustworthiness Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6444-:d:1701512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6444/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6444/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shujie Wang & Mohammed Habes Ibrahiem & Mengyu Li, 2022. "Motivations Influencing Alipay Users to Participate in the Ant Forest Campaign: An Empirical Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Kristy de Salas & Louise Ashbarry & Mikaela Seabourne & Ian Lewis & Lindsay Wells & Julian Dermoudy & Erin Roehrer & Matthew Springer & James D. Sauer & Jenn Scott, 2022. "Improving Environmental Outcomes With Games: An Exploration of Behavioural and Technological Design and Evaluation Approaches," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(5), pages 470-512, October.
    3. Yang Chen & Danqing Cai, 2019. "Ant Forest through the Haze: A Case Study of Gamified Participatory Pro-Environmental Communication in China," J, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Jelena Randjelovic & Anastasia R. O'Rourke & Renato J. Orsato, 2003. "The emergence of green venture capital," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(4), pages 240-253, July.
    5. Zhang, Mengzhu & Zhao, Pengjun & Qiao, Si, 2020. "Smartness-induced transport inequality: Privacy concern, lacking knowledge of smartphone use and unequal access to transport information," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 175-185.
    6. Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2020. "Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Danny Taufik & Jan Willem Bolderdijk & Linda Steg, 2015. "Acting green elicits a literal warm glow," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 37-40, January.
    8. Vrain, E. & Wilson, C. & Kerr, L. & Wilson, M., 2022. "Social influence in the adoption of digital consumer innovations for climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Alina Averchenkova & Sam Fankhauser & Jared J. Finnegan, 2021. "The impact of strategic climate legislation: evidence from expert interviews on the UK Climate Change Act," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 251-263, February.
    10. Zhang, Yufei & Chen, Jiayin & Han, Yi & Qian, Mengxi & Guo, Xiaona & Chen, Ruishan & Xu, Di & Chen, Yi, 2021. "The contribution of Fintech to sustainable development in the digital age: Ant forest and land restoration in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Edward C. Tomlinson & Andrew Schnackenberg, 2022. "The effects of transparency perceptions on trustworthiness perceptions and trust," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabakun Naher Shetu, 2025. "Determinants of generation Z consumers’ mobile online shopping apps continuance intention to use during COVID-19 and beyond—an empirical study," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Nathaniel Geiger, 2022. "Perceptions of Self-Motives and Environmental Activists’ Motives for Pro-Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Juan Li & Xunzhou Chunyu & Feng Huang, 2022. "Land Use Pattern Changes and the Driving Forces in the Shiyang River Basin from 2000 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Hoda M. Aboalsamh & Laith T. Khrais & Sami A. Albahussain, 2023. "Pioneering Perception of Green Fintech in Promoting Sustainable Digital Services Application within Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Deng, Yumiao & Fang, Mengmeng & Ma, Sichao & Wang, Fanzhi & Wu, Wanting, 2025. "The impact of bank FinTech on green credit allocation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Battocletti, Vittoria & Desiato, Alfredo & Romano, Alessandro & Sotis, Chiara & Tröger, Tobias, 2025. "Climate pledges and greenwashing: Information provision does not work," LawFin Working Paper Series 57, Goethe University, Center for Advanced Studies on the Foundations of Law and Finance (LawFin).
    7. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Algharabat, Raed S. & Metri, Bhimaraya & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "Virtual agents and flow experience: An empirical examination of AI-powered chatbots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    8. Li, Meichan & Wang, Rui, 2023. "Chatbots in e-commerce: The effect of chatbot language style on customers’ continuance usage intention and attitude toward brand," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Marina Baroni & Giulia Valdrighi & Andrea Guazzini & Mirko Duradoni, 2025. "“More than a Feeling”: How Eco-Anxiety Shapes Pro-Environmental Behaviors and the Role of Readiness to Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-34, July.
    10. Grieder, Manuel & Baerenbold, Rebekka & Schmitz, Jan & Schubert, Renate, 2022. "The Behavioral Effects of Carbon Taxes – Experimental Evidence," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264112, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. Henk J. Steinz & Frank J. Van Rijnsoever & Frans Nauta, 2016. "How to Green the red Dragon: A Start‐ups' Little Helper for Sustainable Development in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8), pages 593-608, December.
    12. Nadia Palmieri & Flavio Boccia & Assunta Di Vaio & Daniela Covino, 2025. "The Great Filter? A Preliminary Study on Metaverse and Sustainable Food Consumer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Kwok-kin Fung & Shirley Suet-lin Hung & Daniel W. L. Lai & Michelle H. Y. Shum & Hong-wang Fung & Langjie He, 2023. "Access to Information and Communication Technology, Digital Skills, and Perceived Well-Being among Older Adults in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-11, June.
    14. Wei Xiong & Danping Liu & Zizi Li & Qiaoyi Wang & Shibin Yao, 2024. "How Does Ant Forest Influence Low Carbon Consumption Behavior: An Analysis Based on the S-O-R Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Pillai, Rajasshrie & Sivathanu, Brijesh & Rana, Nripendra P., 2025. "Unveiling virtual interactive marketplaces: Shopping motivations in the Metaverse through the lens of uses and gratifications theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Zhiyuan Yu & Doudou Jin, 2021. "Determinants of Users’ Attitude and Intention to Intelligent Connected Vehicle Infotainment in the 5G-V2X Mobile Ecosystem," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:vb9qa_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Habib, Muhammad Danish & Attri, Rekha & Salam, Mohammad Asif & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2025. "Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Zhao, Ruizeng & Sun, Jiasen & Wang, Xinyue, 2024. "Synergistic impact of digital finance and urban agglomeration policy on carbon emission reduction," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    20. Ann Hindley, 2022. "Understanding the Gap between University Ambitions to Teach and Deliver Climate Change Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    21. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Sun, Shanshan & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "An investigation of self-service technology usage during the COVID-19 pandemic: The changing perceptions of ‘self’ and technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6444-:d:1701512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.