IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v46y2015i1p98-112.html

The Simulated Acculturation Model in the FOUNTAINS-Game

Author

Listed:
  • Ivar Männamaa
  • Äli Leijen

Abstract

Background. The problems and benefits of a multicultural society are actively discussed in many countries. FOUNTAINS is a table-top simulation game designed as a study aid to enhance comprehension of cultural integration processes. The game was developed for use in regular classroom settings and has been successfully tested with several groups of participants. The design of the game is based on the bi-dimensional model of acculturation that focuses on the joint issues of maintaining one’s culture and involvement in decision making . It also introduces the dilemma of cooperation and competition in a situation of limited resources . Participants must find ways to preserve their own comprehensive culture and at the same time provide other groups access to resources . Aim. The article examines the dynamics of the game and describes its basic design . The rules of the game and suggestions for debriefing are provided in an accompanying article – this issue. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the game’s validity and to assess the potential educational value and usability of the game. Method. FOUNTAINS was piloted with several groups, and a brief post-game questionnaire was conducted to evaluate learning outcomes. Experts of both integration and gaming were asked to evaluate the game; their feedback on the usability of the game referred to the face value of the game as an educational tool. After piloting the game was introduced to teachers, the majority of whom expressed willingness to use the game in their classes. Conclusion. The article concludes with the basic results of the evaluation. In spite of some limitations it can be said that FOUNTAINS is an efficient learning aid that works well with different age groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivar Männamaa & Äli Leijen, 2015. "The Simulated Acculturation Model in the FOUNTAINS-Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(1), pages 98-112, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:1:p:98-112
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878115591393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878115591393
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878115591393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joris Dormans, 2011. "Beyond Iconic Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 42(5), pages 610-631, October.
    2. Willy C. Kriz, 2003. "Creating Effective Learning Environments and Learning Organizations through Gaming Simulation Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(4), pages 495-511, December.
    3. Timur Kuran & William H. Sandholm, 2008. "Cultural Integration and Its Discontents," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(1), pages 201-228.
    4. Elyssebeth Leigh & Laraine Spindler, 2004. "Simulations and Games as Chaordic Learning Contexts," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(1), pages 53-69, March.
    5. Sandra M. Fowler & Margaret D. Pusch, 2010. "Intercultural Simulation Games: A Review (of the United States and Beyond)," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 41(1), pages 94-115, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "The Power of Sponges," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 512-535, October.
    2. Nancy Taber, 2008. "Emergency response: Elearning for paramedics and firefighters," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(4), pages 515-527, December.
    3. Gilbert Ahamer, 2013. "Game, Not Fight," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 272-301, April.
    4. Orlova, Olena, 2020. "Personal preferences in networks," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 631, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Christian Cordes & Stephan Müller & Georg Schwesinger & Sarianna M. Lundan, 2022. "Governance structures, cultural distance, and socialization dynamics: further challenges for the modern corporation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 371-397, April.
    6. He, Simin, 2019. "Minority advantage and disadvantage in competition and coordination," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 464-482.
    7. Michaeli, Moti & Spiro, Daniel, 2025. "The dynamics of revolutions," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Sagit Bar-Gill & Chaim Fershtman, 2016. "Integration policy: Cultural transmission with endogenous fertility," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 105-133, January.
    9. Jop van den Hoogen & Julia Lo & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2016. "Debriefing Research Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, June.
    10. Jan H. G. Klabbers, 2003. "Simulation and Gaming:Introduction to the Art and Science of Design," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(4), pages 488-494, December.
    11. Jung Ho Choi & Joseph Pacelli & Kristina M. Rennekamp & Sorabh Tomar, 2023. "Do Jobseekers Value Diversity Information? Evidence from a Field Experiment and Human Capital Disclosures," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 61(3), pages 695-735, June.
    12. Michaeli, Moti & Spiro, Daniel, 2013. "The Distribution of Individual Conformity under Social Pressure across Societies," Memorandum 12/2014, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    13. Marcin Wardaszko, 2016. "Building Simulation Game-Based Teaching Program for Secondary School Students," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(3), pages 287-303, June.
    14. Prummer, Anja & Siedlarek, Jan-Peter, 2014. "Institutions And The Preservation Of Cultural Traits," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 470, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    15. Aloys L. Prinz & Christian J. Sander, 2020. "Political leadership and the quality of public goods and services: Does religion matter?," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 299-334, December.
    16. Lucy R. Zheng & Catherine M. Oberle & W. A. Hawkes-Robinson & Stéphane Daniau, 2021. "Serious Games as a Complementary Tool for Social Skill Development in Young People: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 52(6), pages 686-714, December.
    17. Jop van den Hoogen & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2015. "Gaming and Simulation for Railway Innovation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 489-511, October.
    18. Peter Korfiatis & Robert Cloutier & Teresa Zigh, 2015. "Model-Based Concept of Operations Development Using Gaming Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 471-488, October.
    19. Vicente Calabuig & Gonzalo Olcina & Fabrizio Panebianco, 2017. "The dynamics of personal norms and the determinants of cultural homogeneity," Rationality and Society, , vol. 29(3), pages 322-354, August.
    20. Coninx, Kristof & Deconinck, Geert & Holvoet, Tom, 2018. "Who gets my flex? An evolutionary game theory analysis of flexibility market dynamics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 104-113.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:1:p:98-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.