IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v38y2007i3p398-420.html

An evolving simulation/gaming process to facilitate adaptive watershed management in northern mountainous Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Barnaud

    (Paris X-Nanterre University, France, cecile.barnaud@cirad.fr)

  • Tanya Promburom

    (Chiang Mai University, Thailand, thanya@chiangmai.ac.th)

  • Guy Trébuil

    (CIRAD, France, guy.trebuil@cirad.fr)

  • François Bousquet

    (CIRAD, France, francois.bousquet@cirad.fr)

Abstract

The decentralization of natural resource management provides an opportunity for communities to increase their participation in related decision making. Research should propose adapted methodologies enabling the numerous stakeholders of these complex socioecological settings to define their problems and identify agreed-on solutions. This article presents a companion modeling (ComMod) experiment combining role-playing games and multiagent systems conducted in a community in northern Thailand to support collective learning for adaptive land management. Researchers and local stakeholders collectively built a representation of the situation and used it as a platform to explore scenarios. This ComMod process initially addressed a soil erosion problem. The participants identified the expansion of perennial crops as a promising solution but also raised the problem of the unequal ability among villagers to invest in such crops. The researchers flexibly adapted the simulation tools to the emerging matter. The authors assess the learning effects of this experiment and identify two favoring factors: the increasing participation of local stakeholders and a flexible and adaptive modeling process suited to learning, which by nature is an evolving process. But to ensure sustainable impacts for the communities, stronger links with higher institutional levels are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Barnaud & Tanya Promburom & Guy Trébuil & François Bousquet, 2007. "An evolving simulation/gaming process to facilitate adaptive watershed management in northern mountainous Thailand," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(3), pages 398-420, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:38:y:2007:i:3:p:398-420
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878107300670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878107300670
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878107300670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rudd, Murray A., 2000. "Live long and prosper: collective action, social capital and social vision," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 131-144, July.
    2. Olivier Barreteau & François Bousquet & Jean-Marie Attonaty, 2001. "Role-Playing Games for Opening the Black Box of Multi-Agent Systems: Method and Lessons of Its Application to Senegal River Valley Irrigated Systems," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 4(2), pages 1-5.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barnaud, Cécile & Bousquet, François & Trebuil, Guy, 2008. "Multi-agent simulations to explore rules for rural credit in a highland farming community of Northern Thailand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 615-627, July.
    2. Sardorbek Musayev & Jonathan Mellor & Tara Walsh & Emmanouil Anagnostou, 2021. "Development of an Agent-Based Model for Weather Forecast Information Exchange in Rural Area of Bahir Dar, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Johanna Olsson & Lotta Andersson, 2007. "Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(1), pages 97-110, January.
    4. Moojen, Fernanda Gomes & Ryschawy, Julie & dos Santos, Davi Teixeira & Barth Neto, Armindo & Vieira, Paulo Cardozo & Portella, Elisa & de Faccio Carvalho, Paulo César, 2022. "The farm coaching experience to support the transition to integrated crop–livestock systems: From gaming to action," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Fiorillo, Damiano, 2005. "Capitale Sociale Civile: una nota sui concetti e sulla evidenza empirica macro [Civil Social Capital: a note on the concepts and on the macro empirical evidence]," MPRA Paper 3822, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Saenz, Cesar, 2021. "Community partnership and ownership as key factors of community strategies. A Peruvian case study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Katarzyna Ostasiewicz & Michal H. Tyc & Piotr Goliczewski & Piotr Magnuszewski & Andrzej Radosz & Jan Sendzimir, 2006. "Integrating economic and psychological insights in binary choice models with social interactions," Papers physics/0609170, arXiv.org.
    8. Uetake, Tetsuya, 2012. "Providing Agri-environmental Public Goods through Collective Action: Lessons from New Zealand Case Studies," 2012 Conference, August 31, 2012, Nelson, New Zealand 136071, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Luke Oyesola Olarinde & Adebayo Busura Abass & Tahirou Abdoulaye & Adebusola Adenike Adepoju & Matthew Olufemi Adio & Emmanuel Gbenga Fanifosi & Awoyale Wasiu, 2020. "The Influence of Social Networking on Food Security Status of Cassava Farming Households in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-35, July.
    10. repec:plo:pone00:0241108 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Schreinemachers, Pepijn & Berger, Thomas & Aune, Jens B., 2007. "Simulating soil fertility and poverty dynamics in Uganda: A bio-economic multi-agent systems approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 387-401, December.
    12. Ryan Plummer & John FitzGibbon, 2006. "People matter: The importance of social capital in the co‐management of natural resources," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 30(1), pages 51-62, February.
    13. Stanislas Boissau & Jean-Christophe Castella, 2003. "Constructing a Common Representation of Local Institutions and Land Use Systems through Simulation-Gaming and Multiagent Modeling in Rural Areas of Northern Vietnam: The SAMBA-Week Methodology," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(3), pages 342-357, September.
    14. Datu Buyung Agusdinata & Heide Lukosch & Muhammad Hanif & David Watkins, 2023. "A Playful Approach to Household Sustainability: Results From a Pilot Study on Resource Consumption," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(1), pages 104-130, February.
    15. Franziska Appel & Alfons Balmann, 2023. "Predator or prey? Effects of farm growth on neighbouring farms," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 214-236, February.
    16. Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy & Rifkin, Will & Louis, Winnifred & Moffat, Kieren, 2017. "Meaningful dialogue outcomes contribute to laying a foundation for social licence to operate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 347-355.
    17. Barreteau, O. & Bousquet, F. & Millier, C. & Weber, J., 2004. "Suitability of Multi-Agent Simulations to study irrigated system viability: application to case studies in the Senegal River Valley," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 255-275, June.
    18. Akinola Ezekiel Morakinyo & Mabutho Sibanda, 2016. "The Determinants of Non-Performing Loans in the MINT Economies," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(5), pages 39-55.
    19. Luis E Fernandez & Daniel G Brown & Robert W Marans & Joan I Nassauer, 2005. "Characterizing Location Preferences in an Exurban Population: Implications for Agent-Based Modeling," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(6), pages 799-820, December.
    20. Falk, Thomas & Kumar, Shalander & Srigiri, Srinivasa, 2019. "Experimental games for developing institutional capacity to manage common water infrastructure in India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 260-269.
    21. García-Barrios, L.E. & Speelman, E.N. & Pimm, M.S., 2008. "An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 115-126.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:38:y:2007:i:3:p:398-420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.