IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sajbmc/v10y2021i3p276-286.html

‘We Do Much More Than Norms Require’: Making Sense of Family-Owned Healthcare Firms’ Profitability and Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Esa Hiltunen
  • Riikka Holopainen
  • Kang Li

Abstract

To address the literature gap regarding the business ethics of family firms in the healthcare sector, this case study investigates profitability and business ethics from the perspective of a very successful Finnish private healthcare company. The study combines business ethics and sensemaking theories to provide a broad view of the company’s performance and stimulate new thinking about the relationship between ethics and profitability in private healthcare. Company’s profitability requirements seem to elicit disapproval from the public. This study examines how a private, family-owned healthcare company combines business ethics and profitability successfully in its operations and how this family-owned company has successfully constructed a plausible, trusted and ethical identity. The theoretical framework of this study is based on business ethics, profitability, trust and sensemaking theory. The study shows that the case company has worked tirelessly to maintain high ethical practices and standards in providing excellent care and enjoying high profitability. By achieving high standards of business ethics and maintaining good social relations with stakeholders, the company has developed a plausible and trustworthy identity, while continuously improving its operations. The case shows that the surrounding environment, in particular, places significant pressure on the case company’s daily activities and management. Even when customers (municipalities and residents) are very satisfied with the quality of care, this does not automatically lead to performance and profitability in the short term. Profitability as a value creation can also depend on personal relations and trust fostered between the company and its stakeholders. Thus, applying sensemaking theory, profitability means company’s ongoing sensemaking about the plausibility of its actions and reading cues within the environment now and for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Esa Hiltunen & Riikka Holopainen & Kang Li, 2021. "‘We Do Much More Than Norms Require’: Making Sense of Family-Owned Healthcare Firms’ Profitability and Ethics," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 10(3), pages 276-286, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sajbmc:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:276-286
    DOI: 10.1177/22779779211040163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22779779211040163
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22779779211040163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Pirson & Deepak Malhotra, 2011. "Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 1087-1104, August.
    2. James H. Davis & F. David Schoorman & Roger C. Mayer & Hwee Hoon Tan, 2000. "The trusted general manager and business unit performance: empirical evidence of a competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 563-576, May.
    3. Reginald Litz & Nick Turner, 2013. "Sins of the Father’s Firm: Exploring Responses to Inherited Ethical Dilemmas in Family Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 297-315, March.
    4. Mark Blodgett & Colette Dumas & Alberto Zanzi, 2011. "Emerging Trends in Global Ethics: A Comparative Study of U.S. and International Family Business Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 29-38, February.
    5. Michael Pirson & Kirsten Martin & Bidhan Parmar, 2017. "Formation of Stakeholder Trust in Business and the Role of Personal Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    7. Mojca Duh & Jernej Belak & Borut Milfelner, 2010. "Core Values, Culture and Ethical Climate as Constitutional Elements of Ethical Behaviour: Exploring Differences Between Family and Non-Family Enterprises," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 473-489, December.
    8. Treviño, Linda Klebe & Butterfield, Kenneth D. & McCabe, Donald L., 1998. "The Ethical Context in Organizations: Influences on Employee Attitudes and Behaviors," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 447-476, July.
    9. Pedro Vazquez, 2018. "Family Business Ethics: At the Crossroads of Business Ethics and Family Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 691-709, July.
    10. Kelemen, Mihaela & Peltonen, Tuomo, 2001. "Ethics, morality and the subject: the contribution of Zygmunt Bauman and Michel Foucault to 'postmodern' business ethics," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 151-166, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minas N. Kastanakis & Solon Magrizos & Katerina Kampouri & Andrea Calabrò, 2025. "Family Firms and Ethics: Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Determinants of Ethical Decision-Making and Emerging Future Research Pathways," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 919-946, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kowalik, Elena, 2023. "Ethical Problems in Family Firms," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(2), pages 431-452.
    2. Elias Hadjielias & Alfredo Massis & Michael Christofi & Danae Manika & Stephen Brammer, 2025. "Ethical Issues in Family Business: Toward a Deeper Understanding and a New Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 715-731, May.
    3. Minas N. Kastanakis & Solon Magrizos & Katerina Kampouri & Andrea Calabrò, 2025. "Family Firms and Ethics: Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Determinants of Ethical Decision-Making and Emerging Future Research Pathways," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 919-946, May.
    4. Sanjay Chaudhary & Amandeep Dhir & Duc Khuong Nguyen & Enrico Battisti & Puneet Kaur, 2025. "Exploring Family Values, Religion, and Ethical Behavior in Family Businesses: A Multi-Stage Qualitative Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 865-891, May.
    5. Pedro Vazquez, 2018. "Family Business Ethics: At the Crossroads of Business Ethics and Family Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 691-709, July.
    6. Jessenia Davila & Luis Gomez-Mejia & Geoff Martin, 2024. "Family Firms and Employee Pension Underfunding: Good Corporate Citizens or Unethical Opportunists?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(2), pages 323-339, June.
    7. Danny Miller & Isabelle Le Breton-Miller, 2025. "The Best of Firms, the Worst of Firms: Ethical Bifurcation in Family Businesses During Crises," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 733-748, May.
    8. Mª de la Cruz Déniz-Déniz & Mª Katiuska Cabrera-Suárez & Josefa D. Martín-Santana, 2020. "Orientation Toward Key Non-family Stakeholders and Economic Performance in Family Firms: The Role of Family Identification with the Firm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 329-345, May.
    9. Ikseon Suh & Adi Masli & John T. Sweeney, 2021. "Do Management Training Grounds Reduce Internal Auditor Objectivity and External Auditor Reliance? The Influence of Family Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 205-227, September.
    10. Alessandro Cirillo & Maria Angela Manzi & Jonathan Bauweraerts & Salvatore Sciascia, 2025. "Tax Avoidance in Family Business: The Ethical Perspective of CEO Transgenerational Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 841-864, May.
    11. Marcos Ferasso & Tatiana Beliaeva & Sascha Kraus & Paul Jones & Tobias Gössling, 2025. "Family Business Ethics: A Literature Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 141-159, November.
    12. Gopal Krishnan & Marietta Peytcheva, 2019. "The Risk of Fraud in Family Firms: Assessments of External Auditors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 261-278, June.
    13. Elena Casprini & Rocco Palumbo & Jacopo Cammeo & Lorenzo Zanni, 2025. "A ‘Grey’ Side of Family Business Ethics? Looking into the Interplay of Internal and External Ethical Orientations: Empirical Insights from the Wine Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(4), pages 749-770, May.
    14. Melanie Richards, 2023. "When do Non-financial Goals Benefit Stakeholders? Theorizing on Care and Power in Family Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(2), pages 333-351, May.
    15. Sebastian Goebel & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2017. "The Relationship Between Informal Controls, Ethical Work Climates, and Organizational Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 505-528, March.
    16. Kimberly A. Eddleston & Jay P. Mulki, 2021. "Differences in Family-Owned SMEs’ Ethical Behavior: A Mixed Gamble Perspective of Family Firm Tax Evasion," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(4), pages 767-791, July.
    17. Zhu Zhu & Feifei Lu, 2020. "Family Ownership and Corporate Environmental Responsibility: The Contingent Effect of Venture Capital and Institutional Environment," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Dov Fischer & Hershey Friedman, 2021. "Family Business in the #MeToo Era: Lessons from Ruth on Tone at the Top," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 37-55, April.
    19. Stutz, Adrian & Schell, Sabrina & Hack, Andreas, 2022. "In family firms we trust – Experimental evidence on the credibility of sustainability reporting: A replication study with extension," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    20. Rongjia Su & Dianjie Liang & Weili Teng, 2023. "The impact of Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism on CSR practices in family businesses in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1394-1417, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sajbmc:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:276-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.