IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i4p21582440221145675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Impacts of Rice Technological Innovation on the Social Economy

Author

Listed:
  • An Lijie
  • Hu Jiajia
  • Li Qiong
  • Kim Dong-Joo

Abstract

Grain production is important role in ensuring food security. In order to support the local government’s promotion of technological innovation on the rice plantations, the paper aims to evaluate chemical fertilizer reduction and productivity improvement technology modes in a rice paddy in Huai’an Jiangsu from the perspective of its evaluating the social economic effects. Firstly, a brief introduction of the rice plantation requirements including fertilizer and soil requirements, are introduced. Secondly, briefly introduce the most important factors impact rice technological modes including (Economic benefit, Social benefit, Technical characteristics, and management) are briefly discussed. Thirdly, details of multi-correlation of social economic model based on gray correlation analysis for the promotion of organic fertilizer to replace part of the chemical fertilizer technology, followed by the special fertilizer mode, and the other three technology modes. Results show that among the final weights obtained through the gray correlation weighting method, the economic benefit index was 27.15%, followed by the social benefit index with 21.45%, the technical feature index has the highest weight of 34.24%, and the management index with the lowest weight was 17.16%. The evaluation scores of the five technical modes, the ranking of their comprehensive evaluation score from high to low is mode 2 (0.305925) > mode 1 (0.240125) > mode 4 (0.179925) > mode 5 (0.1447) > mode 3 (0.129825). The application of mode 2, that is, the organic substitution of partial fertilizer technology, ranks the first among the five technical modes in the comprehensive evaluation; therefore, it is worthy of prioritization.

Suggested Citation

  • An Lijie & Hu Jiajia & Li Qiong & Kim Dong-Joo, 2022. "Evaluating the Impacts of Rice Technological Innovation on the Social Economy," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:21582440221145675
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221145675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221145675
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221145675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dun-Chun He & Yan-Li Ma & Zhuan-Zhuan Li & Chang-Sui Zhong & Zhao-Bang Cheng & Jiasui Zhan, 2021. "Crop Rotation Enhances Agricultural Sustainability: From an Empirical Evaluation of Eco-Economic Benefits in Rice Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Y. Zong & Z. Chen & J. B. Innes & C. Chen & Z. Wang & H. Wang, 2007. "Fire and flood management of coastal swamp enabled first rice paddy cultivation in east China," Nature, Nature, vol. 449(7161), pages 459-462, September.
    3. Tran, Dung Duc & Huu, Loc Ho & Hoang, Long Phi & Pham, Tien Duy & Nguyen, Au Hai, 2021. "Sustainability of rice-based livelihoods in the upper floodplains of Vietnamese Mekong Delta: Prospects and challenges," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Khanal, Uttam & Wilson, Clevo & Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Lee, Boon, 2018. "Farmers' Adaptation to Climate Change, Its Determinants and Impacts on Rice Yield in Nepal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 139-147.
    5. Joko Mariyono, 2019. "Farmer training to simultaneously increase productivity of soybean and rice in Indonesia," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 68(6), pages 1120-1140, May.
    6. Joko Mariyono & Tom Kompas & R. Grafton, 2010. "Shifting from Green Revolution to environmentally sound policies: technological change in Indonesian rice agriculture," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 128-147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thu-Huong Nguyen & Oz Sahin & Michael Howes, 2021. "Climate Change Adaptation Influences and Barriers Impacting the Asian Agricultural Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Temitope Oluwaseun Ojo & Abiodun A. Ogundeji & Chijioke U. Emenike, 2022. "Does Adoption of Climate Change Adaptation Strategy Improve Food Security? A Case of Rice Farmers in Ogun State, Nigeria," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Jawid, Asadullah & Khadjavi, Menusch, 2019. "Adaptation to climate change in Afghanistan: Evidence on the impact of external interventions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 64-82.
    4. Basanta Paudel & Yili Zhang & Jianzhong Yan & Raju Rai & Lanhui Li & Xue Wu & Prem Sagar Chapagain & Narendra Raj Khanal, 2020. "Farmers’ understanding of climate change in Nepal Himalayas: important determinants and implications for developing adaptation strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 485-502, February.
    5. Theodoros Skevas & Ray Massey & Jasper Grashuis, 2022. "Farmer adoption and intensity of use of extreme weather adaptation and mitigation strategies: evidence from a sample of Missouri farmers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Claudia Di Bene & Rosa Francaviglia & Roberta Farina & Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes & Raúl Zornoza, 2022. "Agricultural Diversification," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-6, March.
    7. Koirala, Pankaj & Kotani, Koji & Managi, Shunsuke, 2022. "How do farm size and perceptions matter for farmers’ adaptation responses to climate change in a developing country? Evidence from Nepal," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 188-204.
    8. Yong Liu & Jorge Ruiz-Menjivar & Junbiao Zhang, 2023. "Do soil nutrient management practices improve climate resilience? Empirical evidence from rice farmers in central China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10029-10054, September.
    9. Ojo, T.O. & Baiyegunhi, L.J.S., 2020. "Determinants of climate change adaptation strategies and its impact on the net farm income of rice farmers in south-west Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Hasibuan, Abdul Muis & Gregg, Daniel & Stringer, Randy, 2020. "Accounting for diverse risk attitudes in measures of risk perceptions: A case study of climate change risk for small-scale citrus farmers in Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    11. Ojo, Temitope O. & Baiyegunhi, Lloyd J.S & Adetoro, Adetoso A. & Ogundeji, Abiodun A., 2021. "Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Technology and Its Impact on the Productivity of Smallholder Rice Farmers in Southwest, Nigeria," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314981, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Khanal, Uttam & Wilson, Clevo & Rahman, Sanzidur & Lee, Boon & Hoang, Vincent, 2020. "Smallholder farmers’ adaptation to climate change and its potential contribution to UN’s sustainable development goals of zero hunger and no poverty," MPRA Paper 106917, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Sep 2020.
    13. Fissha Asmare & Jūratė Jaraitė & Andrius Kažukauskas, 2022. "Climate change adaptation and productive efficiency of subsistence farming: A bias‐corrected panel data stochastic frontier approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 739-760, September.
    14. Serge Svizzero, 2021. "Sustainability, Efficiency, and Circularity of Weedy Rice Management Strategies," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1281-1296, December.
    15. Kuang, Foyuan & Jin, Jianjun & He, Rui & Wan, Xinyu & Ning, Jing, 2019. "Influence of livelihood capital on adaptation strategies: Evidence from rural households in Wushen Banner, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Berchoux, Tristan & Hutton, Craig W. & Hensengerth, Oliver & Voepel, Hal E. & Tri, Van P.D. & Vu, Pham T. & Hung, Nghia N. & Parsons, Dan & Darby, Stephen E., 2023. "Effect of planning policies on land use dynamics and livelihood opportunities under global environmental change: Evidence from the Mekong Delta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Edamisan Stephen Ikuemonisan & Igbekele Amos Ajibefun, 2021. "Economic Implications of Smallholders’ Collaborative Groupings on Household Income and Adaptability to Climate Change in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Mercy Nyambura Mburu & John Mburu & Rose Nyikal & Amin Mugera & Asaah Ndambi, 2024. "Assessment of socio-economic determinants and impacts of climate-smart feeding practices in the Kenyan dairy sector," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1-25, June.
    19. Nguyen, Thanh-Tung & Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Grote, Ulrike, 2023. "Credit, shocks and production efficiency of rice farmers in Vietnam," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 780-791.
    20. Yong Chen & Yaqi Liang & Hao Zhou & Qiaozhi Wang & Yanzhong Liu, 2022. "Farmers’ Adaptive Behaviors to Heavy Metal-Polluted Cultivated Land in Mining Areas: The Influence of Farmers’ Characteristics and the Mediating Role of Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:21582440221145675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.