IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i4p21582440211061528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing the Consumer Acceptance of Innovation in Handicraft Products

Author

Listed:
  • Mohsin Shafi
  • Liu Junrong
  • Yongzhong Yang
  • Deng Jian
  • Imran UR Rahman
  • Mahdi Moudi

Abstract

This study investigates the factors influencing consumer acceptance of certain types of innovation in handicraft products. Another aim of the article is construct/scale development applicable to handicrafts because our study collected scale items from other studies and tried to develop constructs applicable to handicraft products. The descriptive analysis through a quantitative cross-sectional consumer survey was applied along with cluster analysis for consumer market segmentation following the acceptance of certain types of innovations. Eight factors were discovered through EFA. The construct scores for authenticity innovation, packaging innovation, value-adding, product improvement, product design innovation, alternative/new materials, quality materials, and technological innovations were used in the cluster analysis. The results show that most consumers are open to accepting innovation in handicrafts. Particularly, consumers prefer those innovations that do not modify the traditional features and characteristics of products, such as authenticity, packaging, and quality-related innovations. However, consumers considered technological innovations as more skeptical. The comparison of socio-demographic profile of consumer segments with their acceptance of innovation indicates that the younger generation and well-educated consumers are more willing to accept innovation in handicraft products. Contrarily, the old-age consumers were unwilling to accept the innovation and prefer to purchase authentic and quality products. Additionally, as income increases, people like more authentic and quality products. This study focused on an emerging topic for handicraft industry, that is, innovation considered controversial, challenging, and received less attention from scholars in past. Further, this study is the first of its kind to explore the consumer acceptance of innovation in handicraft products.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohsin Shafi & Liu Junrong & Yongzhong Yang & Deng Jian & Imran UR Rahman & Mahdi Moudi, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Consumer Acceptance of Innovation in Handicraft Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211061528
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211061528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211061528
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211061528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsin Shafi & Yongzhong Yang & Zobi Khan & Aixian Yu, 2019. "Vertical Co-operation in Creative Micro-Enterprises: A Case Study of Textile Crafts of Matiari District, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Patricia S. Sánchez-Medina & Jack Corbett & Arcelia Toledo-López, 2011. "Environmental Innovation and Sustainability in Small Handicraft Businesses in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Gatignon, Hubert & Robertson, Thomas S, 1985. "A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(4), pages 849-867, March.
    4. Yongzhong Yang & Mohsin Shafi, 2020. "How does customer and supplier cooperation in micro-enterprises affect innovation? Evidence from Pakistani handicraft micro-enterprises," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(5), pages 530-559, November.
    5. Ian Jackson & Philip Tomlinson, 2009. "The role of cooperation in a creative industry: the case of UK studio pottery," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 691-708.
    6. Michael Polder & George van Leeuwen & Pierre Mohnen & Wladimir Raymond, 2010. "Product, Process and Organizational Innovation: Drivers, Complementarity and Productivity Effects," DRUID Working Papers 10-24, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    7. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Linton, Jonathan D. & Chen, Min-Nan, 2012. "Service regime: An empirical analysis of innovation patterns in service firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(9), pages 1569-1582.
    8. Rosalind C. Paige, 2009. "Profiles Of Successful Craft Micro-Retailers," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 393-412.
    9. Tomlinson, Philip R., 2010. "Co-operative ties and innovation: Some new evidence for UK manufacturing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 762-775, July.
    10. Arturo Molina & Evangelina Aranda & Víctor J. Martín & Jesús Santos, 2014. "Opportunities for craft consumption: analysis of the quality perceived by consumers," International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 64-78.
    11. Xiaofang Zhan & Stuart Walker, 2018. "Value Direction: Moving Crafts toward Sustainability in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Yongzhong Yang & Mohsin Shafi, 0. "How does customer and supplier cooperation in micro-enterprises affect innovation? Evidence from Pakistani handicraft micro-enterprises," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-30.
    13. Suwastika Naidu & Anand Chand & Paul Southgate, 2014. "Determinants of innovation in the handicraft industry of Fiji and Tonga: an empirical analysis from a tourism perspective," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 318-330, October.
    14. Elliot, Esi A., 2016. "Craft consumption and consumer transformation in a transmodern era," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 18-24.
    15. Yongzhong Yang & Mohsin Shafi & Xiaoting Song & Ruo Yang, 2018. "Preservation of Cultural Heritage Embodied in Traditional Crafts in the Developing Countries. A Case Study of Pakistani Handicraft Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Katherine Gundolf & Annabelle Jaouen & Johanna Gast, 2018. "Motives for strategic alliances in cultural and creative industries," Post-Print hal-02945306, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bach Q. Ho, 2024. "Customers’ Prior Knowledge in the Servitization of Traditional Handicrafts," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongzhong Yang & Mohsin Shafi, 2020. "How does customer and supplier cooperation in micro-enterprises affect innovation? Evidence from Pakistani handicraft micro-enterprises," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(5), pages 530-559, November.
    2. Yongzhong Yang & Mohsin Shafi, 0. "How does customer and supplier cooperation in micro-enterprises affect innovation? Evidence from Pakistani handicraft micro-enterprises," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-30.
    3. Mohsin Shafi & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker & Liu Junrong, 2019. "Social Network of Small Creative Firms and Its Effects on Innovation in Developing Countries," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(4), pages 21582440198, December.
    4. Mohsin Shafi & Yongzhong Yang & Zobi Khan & Aixian Yu, 2019. "Vertical Co-operation in Creative Micro-Enterprises: A Case Study of Textile Crafts of Matiari District, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Roy, Subhadip & Mohapatra, Subhalaxmi, 2023. "Exploring the culture–creativity–innovation triad in the handicraft industry using an interpretive approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Wen-Tao Li & Ming-Chyuan Ho & Chun Yang, 2019. "A Design Thinking-Based Study of the Prospect of the Sustainable Development of Traditional Handicrafts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-26, September.
    7. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-587 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Bettina Peters & Rebecca Riley & Iulia Siedschlag & Priit Vahter & John McQuinn, 2014. "Innovation and Productivity in Services: Evidence from Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2014-04, Joint Research Centre.
    9. Rõigas, Kärt, 2011. "Linkage between productivity and innovation in different service sectors," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    10. Anita Gärling & John Thøgersen, 2001. "Marketing of electric vehicles," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 53-65, January.
    11. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Chen, Min-Nan, 2016. "Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1845-1857.
    12. Wenyao Zhang & Qingpu Zhang, 2017. "Exploring Antecedent Difference between Early and Late Adopters of Disruptive Innovation in E-business Microcredit Context: Evidence from China," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Zand, Fardad & Van Beers, Cees & Van Leeuwen, George, 2011. "Information technology, organizational change and firm productivity: A panel study of complementarity effects and clustering patterns in Manufacturing and Services," MPRA Paper 46469, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Anissa Chaibi & Adel Ben Youssef & Leila Peltier-Ben Aoun, 2015. "E-Skills, Brains And Performance Of The Firms: ICT And Ability Of Firms To Conduct Successful Projects In Luxembourg," Post-Print halshs-01068225, HAL.
    16. Deepa Chandrasekaran & Gerard J. Tellis, 2008. "Global Takeoff of New Products: Culture, Wealth, or Vanishing Differences?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 844-860, 09-10.
    17. Ogochukwu Christiana Anyanwu & Sunday Emeka Oloto & Victor Chukwunweike Nwokocha, 2023. "Impact of strategic alliance on the innovation of women-owned enterprises in Nigeria," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Gürtzgen, Nicole & (né Nolte), André Diegmann & Pohlan, Laura & van den Berg, Gerard J., 2021. "Do digital information technologies help unemployed job seekers find a job? Evidence from the broadband internet expansion in Germany," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Hana Kim & Eungdo Kim, 2018. "How an Open Innovation Strategy for Commercialization Affects the Firm Performance of Korean Healthcare IT SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Liwen Wang & Jin Jason Lu & Kevin Zhou, 2023. "Technological Capability Strength/Asymmetry and Supply Chain Process Innovation: The Contingent Roles of Institutional Environments in China," Post-Print hal-03954124, HAL.
    21. Homayounfard, Amir & Zaefarian, Ghasem, 2022. "Key challenges and opportunities of service innovation processes in technology supplier-service provider partnerships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1284-1302.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211061528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.