IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v24y2023i5p953-971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-service Quality: Development and Validation of the Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Baljit Kaur
  • Jasveen Kaur
  • Shivendra Kumar Pandey
  • S. Joshi

Abstract

The present study develops, refines and validates a scale to measure e-service quality. A total of 545 respondents were approached and employed EFA and CFA. Potential items were drawn from relevant literature. The developed e-service quality scale has six dimensions, namely: information quality and usability, reliability, security and privacy, efficiency, system availability and assurance. The findings reveal that information quality and usability was the most significant factor, followed by reliability in contributing to e-service quality. Practitioners may utilize the scale to measure e-service quality and take steps to bridge the gap between customer expectations and perceived quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Baljit Kaur & Jasveen Kaur & Shivendra Kumar Pandey & S. Joshi, 2023. "E-service Quality: Development and Validation of the Scale," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(5), pages 953-971, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:24:y:2023:i:5:p:953-971
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150920920452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150920920452
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150920920452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Al-Nasser & Rushami Zien Yusoff & Rabiul Islam & Abdullah ALNasser, 2013. "E-Service Quality and its Effect on Consumers’ Perceptions Trust," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 5(2), pages 47-55, December.
    2. Babu P. George & Tony L. Henthorne & Thomas R. Panko, 2013. "ASQual: measuring tourist perceived service quality in an airport setting," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(5), pages 526-536.
    3. Franklin Allen & James McAndrews & Philip Strahan, 2002. "E-Finance: An Introduction," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 22(1), pages 5-27, August.
    4. Griffin, Mitch & Babin, Barry J. & Christensen, Finn, 2004. "A cross-cultural investigation of the materialism construct: Assessing the Richins and Dawson's materialism scale in Denmark, France and Russia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 893-900, August.
    5. Udo, Godwin J. & Bagchi, Kallol K. & Kirs, Peeter J., 2010. "An assessment of customers’ e-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 481-492.
    6. Blut, Markus & Chowdhry, Nivriti & Mittal, Vikas & Brock, Christian, 2015. "E-Service Quality: A Meta-Analytic Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 679-700.
    7. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.
    8. Peterson, Robert A, 1994. "A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(2), pages 381-391, September.
    9. Bauer, Hans H. & Falk, Tomas & Hammerschmidt, Maik, 2006. "eTransQual: A transaction process-based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(7), pages 866-875, July.
    10. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lova Rajaobelina & Isabelle Brun & Nour Kilani & Line Ricard, 2022. "Examining emotions linked to live chat services: The role of e-service quality and impact on word of mouth," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 232-249, September.
    2. Shin, Jae Ik & Chung, Ki Han & Oh, Jae Sin & Lee, Chang Won, 2013. "The effect of site quality on repurchase intention in Internet shopping through mediating variables: The case of university students in South Korea," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 453-463.
    3. Adrian Castro-Lopez & Javier Puente & Rodolfo Vazquez-Casielles, 2018. "e-Service Quality Model for Spanish Textile and Fashion Sector: Positioning Analysis and B2C Ranking by F-Topsis," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 485-512, March.
    4. Mohd Naved Khan & Neha Gupta & Manita Matharu & Mohammad Faisal Khan, 2023. "Sustainable E-Service Quality in Tourism: Drivers Evaluation Using AHP-TOPSIS Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Demirci Orel, Fatma & Kara, Ali, 2014. "Supermarket self-checkout service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty: Empirical evidence from an emerging market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 118-129.
    6. Vivek Agrawal & Nitin Seth & Jitendra Kumar Dixit, 2022. "A combined AHP–TOPSIS–DEMATEL approach for evaluating success factors of e-service quality: an experience from Indian banking industry," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 715-747, September.
    7. Tingting Zhao & Jie Lin & Zhenyu Zhang, 2022. "The Influence of Multi-Variation In-Trust Web Feature Behavior Performance on the Information Dissemination Mechanism in Virtual Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Suhail Ahmad Bhat & Mushtaq Ahmad Darzi, 2020. "Online Service Quality Determinants and E-trust in Internet Shopping: A Psychometric Approach," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 45(4), pages 207-222, December.
    9. Blut, Markus, 2016. "E-Service Quality: Development of a Hierarchical Model," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 500-517.
    10. Rashmi Singh & Janmejay Singh, 2017. "Adolescents’ Market Segmentation: Using CSI as a Tool," Vision, , vol. 21(4), pages 425-435, December.
    11. Ageeva, Elena & Melewar, T.C. & Foroudi, Pantea & Dennis, Charles & Jin, Zhongqi, 2018. "Examining the influence of corporate website favorability on corporate image and corporate reputation: Findings from fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 287-304.
    12. Pee, L.G. & Jiang, James & Klein, Gary, 2018. "Signaling effect of website usability on repurchase intention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 228-241.
    13. Masood Ul Hassan & Muhammad Shahid Iqbal & Ume Habibah, 2020. "Self-Service Technology Service Quality: Building Loyalty and Intention Through Technology Trust in Pakistani Service Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    14. Yan Fang & Zhuowen Qu & Wenhua Wang, 2023. "Developing the Scale for Measuring the Service Quality of Internet-Based E-Waste Collection Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Alnawas, Ibrahim & Al Khateeb, Amr, 2022. "Developing and validating a multidisciplinary scale of E-retailing website elements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    16. Schill, Marie & Godefroit-Winkel, Delphine & Diallo, Mbaye Fall & Barbarossa, Camilla, 2019. "Consumers’ intentions to purchase smart home objects: Do environmental issues matter?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 176-185.
    17. Marie Schill & Delphine Godefroit-Winkel & Mbaye Fall Diallo & Camilla Barbarossa, 2019. "Consumers’ intentions to purchase smart home objects: Do environmental issues matter?," Post-Print hal-02091348, HAL.
    18. Nina Shin & Donghui Kim & Sangwook Park & Jungsuk Oh, 2018. "The moderation effects of mobile technology advancement and system barrier on m-commerce channel preference behavior," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 125-154, February.
    19. Chen-Kuo Pai & Ze-Tian Wu & Seunghwan Lee & Jaeseok Lee & Sangguk Kang, 2022. "Service Quality of Social Media-Based Self-Service Technology in the Food Service Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Joseph A. Cazier & Benjamin B. M. Shao & Robert D. St. Louis, 2007. "Sharing information and building trust through value congruence," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 515-529, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:24:y:2023:i:5:p:953-971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.