IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v13y1989i4p355-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Truth and Credibility in Sincere Policy Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Barry Bozeman

    (Syracuse University)

  • David Landsbergen

    (Ohio State University)

Abstract

This article distinguishes two competing approaches to policy analysis: a credibility approach and a truth approach. The credibility approach would define the role of the policy analyst as a search for plausible argument instead of truth. After defining the basic assumptions of the truth and credibility approaches, the implications for the conduct of policy analysis are explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Barry Bozeman & David Landsbergen, 1989. "Truth and Credibility in Sincere Policy Analysis," Evaluation Review, , vol. 13(4), pages 355-379, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:13:y:1989:i:4:p:355-379
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8901300402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8901300402
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8901300402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janet A. Weiss, 1982. "Coping with complexity: An experimental study of public policy decision-making," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(1), pages 66-87.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gasper, D.R., 2000. "Structures and meanings : a way to introduce argumentation analysis in policy studies education," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19062, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    2. Youtie, Jan & Bozeman, Barry & Jabbehdari, Sahra & Kao, Andrew, 2017. "Credibility and use of scientific and technical information in policy making: An analysis of the information bases of the National Research Council’s committee reports," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 108-120.
    3. Louise G. White, 1994. "Policy analysis as discourse," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 506-525.
    4. Einar Rasmussen & Paul Benneworth & Magnus Gulbrandsen, 2015. "How academic entrepreneurship meets the university," CHEPS Working Papers 201511, University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).
    5. J M Bryson & B C Crosby, 1993. "Policy Planning and the Design and Use of Forums, Arenas, and Courts," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 20(2), pages 175-194, April.
    6. Solomon, Gregg E.A. & Youtie, Jan & Carley, Stephen & Porter, Alan L., 2019. "What people learn about how people learn: An analysis of citation behavior and the multidisciplinary flow of knowledge," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    7. Einar Rasmussen & Paul Benneworth & Magnus Gulbrandsen, 2013. "Scoping paper: Developing University Innovation Capacity: How can innovation policy effectively harness universities’ capability to promote high-growth technology businesses?," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20131007, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hodgson, Geoffrey M. & Knudsen, Thorbjørn, 2010. "Generative replication and the evolution of complexity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 12-24, July.
    2. Janet A. Weiss, 1990. "Ideas and inducements in mental health policy," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(2), pages 178-200.
    3. Le Anh Nguyen Long & Megan Foster & Gwen Arnold, 2019. "The impact of stakeholder engagement on local policy decision making," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 549-571, December.
    4. Bérard, Céline, 2009. "Le processus de décision dans les systèmes complexes : une analyse d’une intervention systémique," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/6539 edited by Romelaer, Pierre & Cloutier, Martin L..
    5. Yoh, Allison & Taylor, Brian D. & Gahbauer, John, 2012. "Does Transit Mean Business? Reconciling academic, organizational, and political perspectives on Reforming Transit Fare Policies," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6dv295b7, University of California Transportation Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:13:y:1989:i:4:p:355-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.