IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v33y2015i4p746-764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connective management and governance network performance: the mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Ingmar van Meerkerk
  • Jurian Edelenbos
  • Erik-Hans Klijn

Abstract

In this paper we empirically examine the relationship between connective management, democratic legitimacy, and network performance in governance networks around complex water projects in the Netherlands. Realizing effective and legitimate solutions in such a context is highly challenging, as a variety of interests are at stake, and actors often disagree about goals of the water issue at stake. Although previous research has indicated the importance of network management for the performance of governance networks, the issue of democratic legitimacy is not much addressed in this relationship. Building on the literature, we expect to find that throughput legitimacy has a partly mediating role in the relationship between connective management and network performance. The results, based on survey research, indicate that governance networks have indeed democratic potential but, in order to make this potential manifest, network managers can play a key ‘connective’ role. Furthermore, the results confirm our hypotheses that throughput legitimacy positively affects network performance and that it has a mediating effect on the relationship between connective management and network performance. Network managers can create important conditions for the evolution of a democratic governance process, but are dependent on the way stakeholders interact with one another and the democratic quality of that interaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingmar van Meerkerk & Jurian Edelenbos & Erik-Hans Klijn, 2015. "Connective management and governance network performance: the mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in the Netherlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(4), pages 746-764, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:33:y:2015:i:4:p:746-764
    DOI: 10.1068/c1345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c1345
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c1345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Head, 2008. "Assessing network-based collaborations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 733-749.
    2. Ingmar Meerkerk & Jurian Edelenbos, 2014. "The effects of boundary spanners on trust and performance of urban governance networks: findings from survey research on urban development projects in the Netherlands," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 47(1), pages 3-24, March.
    3. Laurence J. O'Toole & Richard M. Walker & Kenneth J. Meier & George A. Boyne, 2007. "Networking in comparative context," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 401-420, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Woodhouse, P. & Muller, M., 2017. "Water Governance—An Historical Perspective on Current Debates," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 225-241.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gema Lobillo Mora & Xavier Ginesta & Jordi de San Eugenio Vela, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Football Clubs: The Value of Environmental Sustainability as a Basis for the Rebranding of Real Betis Balompié in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Manuel Fischer & Philip Leifeld, 2015. "Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 363-382, September.
    3. Boaventura, Joao Mauricio & Carnaúba, A.A.C. & Todeva, Emanuela & Azevedo, A.C. & Armando, Eduardo, 2016. "Governance Structures and Trust: a Study of Real Estate Networks," MPRA Paper 76785, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Flannery, Wesley & O’Hagan, Anne Marie & O’Mahony, Cathal & Ritchie, Heather & Twomey, Sarah, 2015. "Evaluating conditions for transboundary Marine Spatial Planning: Challenges and opportunities on the island of Ireland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 86-95.
    5. Sartas, Murat & Schut, Marc & Hermans, Frans & Asten, Piet van & Leeuwis, Cees, 2018. "Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20.
    6. Steffie Lucidarme & Greet Cardon & Annick Willem, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Health Promotion Networks: Configurations of determinants for network effectiveness," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1163-1217, September.
    7. Carmen Echebarria & Jose M. Barrutia, 2011. "Managing Policy Networks: A Social Marketing- And Collective Intelligence Systems-Driven View," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1402, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Annick Willem & Steffie Lucidarme, 2014. "Pitfalls and Challenges for Trust and Effectiveness in Collaborative Networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 733-760, June.
    9. Hermans, Frans & van Apeldoorn, Dirk & Stuiver, Marian & Kok, Kasper, 2013. "Niches and networks: Explaining network evolution through niche formation processes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 613-623.
    10. Ren Ze & Zhan Kun & Francis Boadu & Liu Yu, 2018. "The Effects of Boundary-Spanning Search, Network Ties, and Absorptive Capacity for Innovation: A Moderated Mediation Examination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Maria Schiller, 2022. "Urban planners as boundary spanners: Steering perceptions of asylum seeker accommodations in Germany," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(3), pages 763-778, May.
    12. Jill Fernandes & Dominique Blache & Shane K. Maloney & Graeme B. Martin & Bronwyn Venus & Frederick Rohan Walker & Brian Head & Alan Tilbrook, 2019. "Addressing Animal Welfare through Collaborative Stakeholder Networks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Palomo-Navarro, Álvaro & Navío-Marco, Julio, 2018. "Smart city networks' governance: The Spanish smart city network case study," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 872-880.
    14. Elin Marianne Smith & Anna Thomasson, 2018. "The Use of the Partnering Concept for Public–Private Collaboration: How Well Does it Really Work?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 191-206, June.
    15. Lena Brogaard, 2021. "Innovative outcomes in public-private innovation partnerships: a systematic review of empirical evidence and current challenges," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 135-157, January.
    16. Steffie Lucidarme & Mathieu Marlier & Greet Cardon & Ilse Bourdeaudhuij & Annick Willem, 2014. "Critical success factors for physical activity promotion through community partnerships," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(1), pages 51-60, February.
    17. Arntsen, Bjørnulf & Torjesen, Dag Olaf & Karlsen, Tor-Ivar, 2020. "Associations between structures, processes and outcomes in inter-municipal cooperation in out-of-hours services in Norway: A survey study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    18. Asnawi Manaf & Novia Purbasari & Maya Damayanti & Nanda Aprilia & Winny Astuti, 2018. "Community-Based Rural Tourism in Inter-Organizational Collaboration: How Does It Work Sustainably? Lessons Learned from Nglanggeran Tourism Village, Gunungkidul Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Daryl P. McPhee, 2017. "Urban Recreational Fisheries in the Australian Coastal Zone: The Sustainability Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    20. Peeters, Robin & Westra, Daan & van Raak, Arno J.A. & Ruwaard, Dirk, 2023. "Getting our hopes up: How actors perceive network effectiveness and why it matters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:33:y:2015:i:4:p:746-764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.