IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v381y2025ics0277953625006422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Going in circles? – Identifying the dissemination process of healthcare networks within their member organizations

Author

Listed:
  • van der Ven, Roos G.F.M.
  • Westra, Daan
  • van Erning, Felice N.
  • de Hingh, Ignace H.
  • Paulus, Agnes

Abstract

Purpose-oriented networks are the dominant organizational model for collaboratively addressing complex healthcare challenges. However, their impact on health outcomes remains limited, because organizations rarely adapt their practices based on network-level decisions. Using an in-depth multiple case study of three multi-hospital networks, we therefore developed a process model to understand the dissemination process from the network level to the operational level. The study utilized 24 hours of network meeting observations, 241 pages of document analysis, and 39 semi-structured interviews with representatives attending network meetings and operational-level constituents. We identified a cyclical five-component dissemination process: achievement of transferrable output, brokerage activities of representatives, internal transfer, adoption within member organizations, and organizational input in the network. Three overarching inhibiting factors—lack of time, lack of commitment, and constituency misalignment—influence each component. This model, rooted in network theory and implementation science, explains why many networks fail. Furthermore, it offers a framework for network managers to navigate each component systematically, addressing threats and barriers to enhance the dissemination process and network success.

Suggested Citation

  • van der Ven, Roos G.F.M. & Westra, Daan & van Erning, Felice N. & de Hingh, Ignace H. & Paulus, Agnes, 2025. "Going in circles? – Identifying the dissemination process of healthcare networks within their member organizations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006422
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625006422
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.