IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v50y2023i6p1502-1517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do urban services facilities affect social segregation among people of different economic levels? A case study of Shenzhen city

Author

Listed:
  • Yuyang Wu
  • Yao Yao
  • Shuliang Ren
  • Shiyi Zhang
  • Qingfeng Guan

Abstract

Social segregation hinders the development of cities and has become a hot topic in urban research. Existing studies have focused on the difference in the distribution of crowd activities to measure segregation but have ignored the impact of the urban environment on crowd gathering and segregation. To study the impact and understand social segregation more comprehensively, we coupled mobile phone datasets and housing price data to divide city dwellers into three socioeconomic levels. Considering that spatial colocation is a necessary condition for interaction among various social groups, spatial colocation probability was proposed to quantitatively describe the degree of social segregation at the community scale. Point-of-interest (POI) data were introduced to represent the urban service facilities. The effect of urban service facilities on the segregation of different groups was analyzed by using geographically weighted regression (GWR). The results indicate three points, as follows. (1) Significant social segregation in Shenzhen mostly occurs in suburban and downtown areas, and the interaction segregation of people mainly occurs between people with high and low socioeconomic levels. (2) More economically inclusive and necessary service facilities (e.g., medical and insurance companies) can promote crowd interaction and ease the segregation of social activities. (3) The impact of service facilities on the interaction of various social groups is related to the development of the area where the activities occur, and the most significant impact is in high-tech industrial zones. This study quantitatively calculated the impacts of different service facilities on different groups of people in different communities and times. From the results, detailed and reasonable suggestions were made for city planners.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuyang Wu & Yao Yao & Shuliang Ren & Shiyi Zhang & Qingfeng Guan, 2023. "How do urban services facilities affect social segregation among people of different economic levels? A case study of Shenzhen city," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1502-1517, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:6:p:1502-1517
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083221140415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083221140415
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083221140415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bee-Lia Chua & Shahrim Karim & Sanghyeop Lee & Heesup Han, 2020. "Customer Restaurant Choice: An Empirical Analysis of Restaurant Types and Eating-Out Occasions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Ya Ping Wang & Yanglin Wang & Jiansheng Wu, 2009. "Urbanization and Informal Development in China: Urban Villages in Shenzhen," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 957-973, December.
    3. David M. Brasington & Diane Hite & Andres Jauregui, 2015. "House Price Impacts Of Racial, Income, Education, And Age Neighborhood Segregation," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 442-467, June.
    4. Mouratidis, Kostas, 2020. "Neighborhood characteristics, neighborhood satisfaction, and well-being: The links with neighborhood deprivation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Robinson, Amanda Lea, 2020. "Ethnic Diversity, Segregation and Ethnocentric Trust in Africa," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 217-239, January.
    6. Markus Schläpfer & Lei Dong & Kevin O’Keeffe & Paolo Santi & Michael Szell & Hadrien Salat & Samuel Anklesaria & Mohammad Vazifeh & Carlo Ratti & Geoffrey B. West, 2021. "The universal visitation law of human mobility," Nature, Nature, vol. 593(7860), pages 522-527, May.
    7. Juan Carrasco & Eric Miller, 2006. "Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 463-480, September.
    8. Le Roux, Guillaume & Vallée, Julie & Commenges, Hadrien, 2017. "Social segregation around the clock in the Paris region (France)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 134-145.
    9. Wang, Jiaxin & Lu, Feng, 2021. "Modeling the electricity consumption by combining land use types and landscape patterns with nighttime light imagery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    10. Tiit Tammaru & Szymon Marcin´czak & Raivo Aunap & Maarten van Ham & Heleen Janssen, 2020. "Relationship between income inequality and residential segregation of socioeconomic groups," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 450-461, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yanji & Wang, Jiejing & Kan, Changcheng, 2022. "Temporal variation in activity-space-based segregation: A case study of Beijing using location-based service data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Kolkowski, Lukas & Cats, Oded & Dixit, Malvika & Verma, Trivik & Jenelius, Erik & Cebecauer, Matej & Rubensson, Isak Jarlebring, 2023. "Measuring activity-based social segregation using public transport smart card data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Di Ciommo, Floridea & Comendador, Julio & López-Lambas, María Eugenia & Cherchi, Elisabetta & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2014. "Exploring the role of social capital influence variables on travel behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 46-55.
    4. Miguel Picornell & Tomás Ruiz & Maxime Lenormand & José Ramasco & Thibaut Dubernet & Enrique Frías-Martínez, 2015. "Exploring the potential of phone call data to characterize the relationship between social network and travel behavior," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 647-668, July.
    5. Taede Tillema & Martin Dijst & Tim Schwanen, 2010. "Decisions concerning Communication Modes and the Influence of Travel Time: A Situational Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(9), pages 2058-2077, September.
    6. Aguiléra, Anne & Guillot, Caroline & Rallet, Alain, 2012. "Mobile ICTs and physical mobility: Review and research agenda," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 664-672.
    7. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Zhou, Meng, 2018. "Residential relocation and changes in travel behavior: what is the role of social context change?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 360-374.
    8. Timo Ohnmacht, 2009. "Social-Activity Travel: Do the ‘Strong-Tie Relationships’ of a Person Exist in the Same Community? The Case of Switzerland," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(12), pages 3003-3022, December.
    9. Roy, P. & Martínez, A.J. & Miscione, G. & Zuidgeest, M.H.P. & van Maarseveen, M.F.A.M., 2012. "Using Social Network Analysis to profile people based on their e-communication and travel balance," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 111-122.
    10. Liu, Jianmiao & Li, Junyi & Chen, Yong & Lian, Song & Zeng, Jiaqi & Geng, Maosi & Zheng, Sijing & Dong, Yinan & He, Yan & Huang, Pei & Zhao, Zhijian & Yan, Xiaoyu & Hu, Qinru & Wang, Lei & Yang, Di & , 2023. "Multi-scale urban passenger transportation CO2 emission calculation platform for smart mobility management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    11. Ettema, Dick & Zwartbol, Danielle, 2013. "The structure of joint leisure trips: analyzing two-person leisure trips of Dutch students," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 216-225.
    12. Hongwei Guo & Ji Han & Jian Wang, 2021. "Population mobility, urban centrality and subnetworks in China revealed by social sensing big data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(8), pages 1855-1858, November.
    13. Paulsen, Mads & Rich, Jeppe, 2023. "Societally optimal expansion of bicycle networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Li, Ze-Tao & Nie, Wei-Peng & Cai, Shi-Min & Zhao, Zhi-Dan & Zhou, Tao, 2023. "Exploring the topological characteristics of urban trip networks based on taxi trajectory data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    15. Toger, Marina & Türk, Umut & Östh, John & Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter, 2023. "Inequality in leisure mobility: An analysis of activity space segregation spectra in the Stockholm conurbation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. Dinghuan Yuan & Yung Yau & Haijun Bao & Yongshen Liu & Ting Liu, 2019. "Anatomizing the Institutional Arrangements of Urban Village Redevelopment: Case Studies in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Farber, Steven & Páez, Antonio, 2009. "My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 216-225.
    18. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen, 2015. "Tradeoffs between in- and out-of-residential neighborhood locations for discretionary activities and time use: do social contexts matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 119-127.
    19. Baka, Anastasia & Mabon, Leslie, 2020. "Assessing equality in neighbourhood availability of quality greenspace in Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom," SocArXiv d9jeh, Center for Open Science.
    20. Pauline Van den Berg & Astrid Kemperman & Boy De Kleijn & Aloys Borgers, 2015. "Locations that Support Social Activity Participation of the Aging Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:6:p:1502-1517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.