IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v55y2023i5p1255-1280.html

The US–China rivalry and the emergence of state platform capitalism

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Rolf

    (Digit Centre, 243731University of Sussex School of Business Management and Economics, Falmer, Brighton, UK)

  • Seth Schindler

    (Global Development Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Second Cold War Observatory, Manchester, UK)

Abstract

The rise of digital platforms as a new form of business organisation concentrates power in the United States and China. Platform capitalism further intersects with and reinforces pre-existing trends towards state capitalism, where states more actively direct economies in response to economic turbulence and heightened geopolitical tension. The concentration of global business power within two states, combined with the increasing capacity for these states to leverage and direct platform activities for their own geopolitical–economic ends, has catalyzed the rise of ‘state platform capitalism’ (SPC). This paper develops the notion of SPC as an emergent logic of competition for both states and firms – in particular, the ways in which Beijing and Washington instrumentalise and mobilise domestic platform firms in pursuit of geopolitical–economic objectives, while platforms become increasingly interdependent with their home state institutions. Competition in the global political economy is increasingly centred on the recruitment of users and nations to these rival state-platform nexuses (national ‘stacks’) as a means of establishing and exercising extraterritorial economic and political power. Empirically, we identify variations between American and Chinese modes of practicing state platform capitalism, and we examine three axes within which this competition unfolds internationally: currencies, standards and cybersecurity.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Rolf & Seth Schindler, 2023. "The US–China rivalry and the emergence of state platform capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(5), pages 1255-1280, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:5:p:1255-1280
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221146545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X221146545
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X221146545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gallagher, Kevin P., 2016. "The China Triangle: Latin America's China Boom and the Fate of the Washington Consensus," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190246730.
    2. Milan Babic & Javier Garcia-Bernardo & Eelke M. Heemskerk, 2020. "The rise of transnational state capital: state-led foreign investment in the 21st century," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 433-475, May.
    3. Weber, Steven, 2017. "Data, development, and growth," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 397-423, September.
    4. Wade, Robert H., 2017. "The American paradox: ideology of free markets and the hidden practice of directional thrust," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 69765, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Karl Aiginger & Dani Rodrik, 2020. "Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 189-207, June.
    6. Robert H. Wade, 2017. "The American paradox: ideology of free markets and the hidden practice of directional thrust," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(3), pages 859-880.
    7. Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2020. "The platform economy: restructuring the space of capitalist accumulation," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 55-76.
    8. Daniel Haberly & Dariusz Wójcik, 2017. "Earth Incorporated: Centralization and Variegation in the Global Company Network," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 93(3), pages 241-266, May.
    9. Sai Lan & Junsong Chen & Kun Liu, 2022. "Open-Source Software Platform Innovation in China: Past, Present, and the Future," Post-Print hal-05531908, HAL.
    10. Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2019. "Unicorns, Cheshire cats, and the new dilemmas of entrepreneurial finance," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 35-50, January.
    11. Saadatmand, Fatemeh & Lindgren, Rikard & Schultze, Ulrike, 2019. "Configurations of platform organizations: Implications for complementor engagement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    12. Kenney, Martin & Zysman, John, 2020. "COVID-19 and the Increasing Centrality and Power of Platforms in China, the US, and Beyond," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 747-752, October.
    13. Vinod K. Aggarwal & Andrew W. Reddie, 2018. "Comparative industrial policy and cybersecurity: a framework for analysis," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 291-305, September.
    14. Cecilia Rikap & Bengt-Åke Lundvall, 2021. "AI Policies and Politics in China and the US Between Techno-Globalism and Techno-Nationalism," Springer Books, in: The Digital Innovation Race, chapter 0, pages 145-163, Springer.
    15. Christopher Foster & Shamel Azmeh, 2020. "Latecomer Economies and National Digital Policy: An Industrial Policy Perspective," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(7), pages 1247-1262, June.
    16. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "What is Platform Governance?," SocArXiv fbu27, Center for Open Science.
    17. Seth Schindler & J. Miguel Kanai, 2021. "Getting the territory right: infrastructure-led development and the re-emergence of spatial planning strategies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 40-51, January.
    18. Hongying Wang & Hanzhi Yu, 2022. "Aspiring rule-makers: Chinese business actors in global governance," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 137-157, January.
    19. Tugendhat, Henry & Voo, Julia, 2021. "China's Digital Silk Road in Africa and the Future of Internet Governance," SAIS-CARI Policy Briefs 60/2021, Johns Hopkins University, School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), China Africa Research Initiative (CARI).
    20. Kai Jia & Martin Kenney, 2022. "The Chinese platform business group: an alternative to the Silicon Valley model?," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 58-80, January.
    21. Wilfred Dolfsma & Anna Grosman, 2019. "State Capitalism Revisited: A Review of Emergent Forms and Developments," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 579-586, April.
    22. Ha‐Joon Chang & Antonio Andreoni, 2020. "Industrial Policy in the 21st Century," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(2), pages 324-351, March.
    23. Gao, Xudong, 2014. "A latecomer's strategy to promote a technology standard: The case of Datang and TD-SCDMA," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 597-607.
    24. Herman Mark Schwartz, 2019. "American hegemony: intellectual property rights, dollar centrality, and infrastructural power," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 490-519, May.
    25. Vinod K. Aggarwal & Andrew W. Reddie, 2018. "Comparative industrial policy and cybersecurity: the US case," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 445-466, September.
    26. Tugendhat, Henry & Voo, Julia, 2021. "China's Digital Silk Road in Africa and the Future of Internet Governance," SAIS-CARI Working Papers 2021/50, Johns Hopkins University, School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), China Africa Research Initiative (CARI).
    27. Mingtang Liu & Kellee S. Tsai, 2021. "Structural Power, Hegemony, and State Capitalism: Limits to China’s Global Economic Power," Politics & Society, , vol. 49(2), pages 235-267, June.
    28. Imogen T. Liu & Adam D. Dixon, 2021. "Legitimating State Capital: The Global Financial Professions and the Transnationalization of Chinese Sovereign Wealth," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(5), pages 1251-1273, September.
    29. Kim, Mi-jin & Lee, Heejin & Kwak, Jooyoung, 2020. "The changing patterns of China’s international standardization in ICT under techno-nationalism: A reflection through 5G standardization," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    30. Zlatko Bodrožić & Paul S. Adler, 2022. "Alternative Futures for the Digital Transformation: A Macro-Level Schumpeterian Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 105-125, January.
    31. Sai Lan & Junsong Chen & Kun Liu, 2022. "Open-Source Software Platform Innovation in China: Past, Present, and the Future," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Chinese Innovation and Branding Leaps, chapter 3, pages 39-77, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    32. repec:osf:socarx:fbu27_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Wencong & Wang, Juan, 2026. "The impact of digital finance on China-U.S. economic security relationship: A dual perspective of financial innovation and national security," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ilias Alami & Adam D Dixon, 2023. "Uneven and combined state capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(1), pages 72-99, February.
    2. Markus Grillitsch & Björn T. Asheim, 2024. "Towards regenerative regional development in responsible value chains: an agentic response to recent crises," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(11), pages 2293-2318, November.
    3. Neil McGregor & Neil M. Coe, 2023. "Hybrid governance and extraterritoriality: Understanding Singapore's state capitalism in the context of oil global production networks," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(3), pages 716-741, May.
    4. Grillitsch, Markus & Asheim, Bjørn, 2022. "Bouncing back, forward, and beyond: Towards regenerative regional development in responsible value chains," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/11, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    5. Boyao Zhang & Liping Xu, 2025. "Research on Policy Optimization for Coordinated Development of Digital Content Industry in China’s Yangtze River Delta Region—Based on the PMC-Index Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    6. Gawer, Annabelle & Harracá, Martín, 2025. "Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    7. Makoza, Frank, 2023. "Analyzing policy change of Malawi ICT and Digitalization policy: Policy Assemblage Perspective," EconStor Preprints 273309, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Gernot Grabher & Erwin van Tuijl, 2020. "Uber-production: From global networks to digital platforms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 1005-1016, August.
    9. Chang Zhang & Lexuan Wang, 2025. "Virtual Worlds, Real Politics: A Cross‐National Comparative Study of Metaverse Policy Approaches," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    10. Yang, You-hong & Gao, Ping & Zhou, Haimei, 2023. "Understanding the evolution of China's standardization policy system," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2).
    11. Gergely Buda & Judit Ricz, 2023. "Industrial symbiosis and industrial policy for sustainable development in Uganda," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 165-189, April.
    12. Kim, Mi-jin & Eom, Doyoung & Lee, Heejin, 2023. "The geopolitics of next generation mobile communication standardization: The case of open RAN," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    13. Hafele, Jakob & Le Lannou, Laure-Alizée & Rochowicz, Nils & Kuhls, Sonia & Gräbner-Radkowitsch, Claudius, 2023. "Securing future-fit jobs in the green transformation: A policy framework for industrial policy," ZOE Discussion Papers 10, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    14. Wu, Mian & Liu, Yulong & Chung, Henry F.L. & Guo, Shoujia, 2022. "When and how mobile payment platform complementors matter in cross-border B2B e-commerce ecosystems? An integration of process and modularization analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 843-854.
    15. Dmitry O. Skobelev, 2020. "Industrial policy of increasing resource efficiency and the achievement of the sustainable development goals," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 21(4), pages 153-173, December.
    16. Ioanna Kastelli & Lukasz Mamica & Keun Lee, 2023. "New perspectives and issues in industrial policy for sustainable development: from developmental and entrepreneurial to environmental state," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, April.
    17. Robert Wade, 2018. "Escaping the periphery: The East Asian ‘mystery’ solved," WIDER Working Paper Series 101, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Peng, Hui & Lu, Yaobin & Gupta, Sumeet, 2023. "Promoting value emergence through digital platform ecosystems: Perspectives on resource integration in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Robert Wade, 2018. "Escaping the periphery: The East Asian 'mystery' solved," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-101, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Matt Andrews & Peter Harrington, 2023. "Facilitating learning and discovery-oriented industrial policy in Albania," CID Working Papers 431, Center for International Development at Harvard University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:5:p:1255-1280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.