IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v27y1995i1p121-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Invariance of Achieved Utility in Random Utility Models

Author

Listed:
  • P O Lindberg

    (Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • E A Eriksson

    (National Defence Research Establishment, S-17290 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • L-G Mattsson

    (Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Royal Institute of Technology, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

The property in some random utility models that the distribution of achieved utility is invariant across alternatives (the invariance property) is noteworthy as it applies to the multinomial logit model as well as to its generalization: the generalized extreme-value (GEV) models. GEV models constitute the most versatile tool yet known for dealing with discrete choice situations with a structure of similarity—that is, statistical dependence—among alternatives. The invariance property is obviously violated in practice for heterogeneous populations. Therefore it has been argued that invariance constitutes a major problem for GEV models. In contrast these authors argue that invariance is a useful theoretical concept precisely by bringing out heterogeneity. Further, multiple segment GEV models are a suitable tool for dealing with heterogeneity—both theoretically and pragmatically. The class of random utility models possessing the invariance property was characterized by Robertson and Strauss; called the RS class here. However, their proof was not complete. An alternative representation of the RS class is suggested based on the notion of additive homogeneity. This new representation enables the authors to prove the RS characterization theorem and to simplify and systematize the proofs of many other results on RS—and specifically GEV—models. Also, in the new representation, the characterization is naturally stated in terms of the choice probabilities, and of the probability distribution of maximum utility. Assuming that the distribution of actual choices is observable, the choice probabilities are particularly empirically meaningful. This motivates a study of the conditions for a choice probability structure to be RS representable. For the binary choice case conditions that are both necessary and sufficient are given.

Suggested Citation

  • P O Lindberg & E A Eriksson & L-G Mattsson, 1995. "Invariance of Achieved Utility in Random Utility Models," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(1), pages 121-142, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:27:y:1995:i:1:p:121-142
    DOI: 10.1068/a270121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a270121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a270121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Tony E., 1988. "Price equilibria for markets with supply rigidities and demand heterogeneity," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 165-197, February.
    2. Timmermans, Harry & Borgers, Aloys & van der Waerden, Peter, 1991. "Mother logit analysis of substitution effects in consumer shopping destination choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 311-323, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mattsson, Lars-Göran & Weibull, Jörgen W. & Lindberg, Per Olov, 2014. "Extreme values, invariance and choice probabilities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 81-95.
    2. Fosgerau, Mogens & McFadden, Daniel & Bierlaire, Michel, 2010. "Choice probability generating functions," MPRA Paper 24214, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. John K. Dagsvik, 2001. "Compensated Variation in Random Utility Models," Discussion Papers 299, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    4. Fosgerau, Mogens & Lindberg, Per Olov & Mattsson, Lars-Göran & Weibull, Jörgen, 2015. "Invariance of the distribution of the maximum," MPRA Paper 63529, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Dagsvik, John K., 2012. "Behavioral Multistate Duration Models: What should they look like ?," Memorandum 17/2012, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    6. John K. Dagsvik, 1996. "Dynamic Choice, Multistate Duration Models and Stochastic Structure," Discussion Papers 172, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    7. John K. Dagsvik, 2012. "Behavioral multistate duration models. What should they look like?," Discussion Papers 688, Statistics Norway, Research Department.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Dekker, Thijs, 2014. "Random regret minimization for consumer choice modeling: Assessment of empirical evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2428-2436.
    2. Jayson L. Lusk & Glynn T. Tonsor, 2016. "How Meat Demand Elasticities Vary with Price, Income, and Product Category," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 38(4), pages 673-711.
    3. Marije Schaafsma & Roy Brouwer, 2020. "Substitution Effects in Spatial Discrete Choice Experiments," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(2), pages 323-349, February.
    4. Jan Rouwendal, 1990. "Stochastic Market Equilibria With Rationing And Limited Price Flexibility," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(1), pages 57-68, January.
    5. Haase, Knut & Müller, Sven, 2013. "Management of school locations allowing for free school choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 847-855.
    6. Carson, Richard T. & Eagle, Thomas C. & Islam, Towhidul & Louviere, Jordan J., 2022. "Volumetric choice experiments (VCEs)," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    7. Rouwendal, J., 1990. "Stochastic market equilibria with efficient rationing with an application to the Dutch housing market," Serie Research Memoranda 0030, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    8. Lipovetsky, Stan & Conklin, Michael, 2014. "Finding items cannibalization and synergy by BWS data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 1-9.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:27:y:1995:i:1:p:121-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.