IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/entthe/v43y2019i3p419-436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conquering Relevance: Entrepreneurship Research's Grand Challenge

Author

Listed:
  • Johan Wiklund
  • Mike Wright
  • Shaker A. Zahra

Abstract

Entrepreneurship research has grown rapidly in its scope, rigor, and impact. By every measure, our field now enjoys considerable academic acceptance and legitimacy as a scholarly discipline. However, several forces around the globe are demanding greater attention to (and perhaps redefinition of) relevance. We discuss what relevance means, how the field can achieve it, and how to best communicate it to the diverse stakeholders of our field.

Suggested Citation

  • Johan Wiklund & Mike Wright & Shaker A. Zahra, 2019. "Conquering Relevance: Entrepreneurship Research's Grand Challenge," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(3), pages 419-436, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:43:y:2019:i:3:p:419-436
    DOI: 10.1177/1042258718807478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1042258718807478
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1042258718807478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianna Makri & Michael A. Hitt & Peter J. Lane, 2010. "Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 602-628, June.
    2. Jeffery S. McMullen, 2011. "Delineating the Domain of Development Entrepreneurship: A Market–Based Approach to Facilitating Inclusive Economic Growth," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 185-215, January.
    3. Saras D. Sarasvathy & Sankaran Venkataraman, 2011. "Entrepreneurship as Method: Open Questions for an Entrepreneurial Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 113-135, January.
    4. Landström, Hans & Harirchi, Gouya, 2018. "The social structure of entrepreneurship as a scientific field," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 650-662.
    5. Frese, Michael & Bausch, Andreas & Schmidt, Peter & Rauch, Andreas & Kabst, Rüdiger, 2012. "Evidence-based Entrepreneurship: Cumulative Science, Action Principles, and Bridging the Gap Between Science and Practice," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 8(1), pages 1-62, March.
    6. Shaker A. Zahra & Lance R. Newey, 2009. "Maximizing the Impact of Organization Science: Theory‐Building at the Intersection of Disciplines and/or Fields," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 1059-1075, September.
    7. Gaylen N. Chandler & Douglas W. Lyon, 2001. "Issues of Research Design and Construct Measurement in Entrepreneurship Research: The past Decade," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 101-113, July.
    8. Danny Miller & Isabelle Le Breton-Miller, 2017. "Underdog Entrepreneurs: A Model of Challenge–Based Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(1), pages 7-17, January.
    9. Per Davidsson & Johan Wiklund, 2001. "Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 81-100, July.
    10. Johan Wiklund & Per Davidsson & David B. Audretsch & Charlie Karlsson, 2011. "The Future of Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 1-9, January.
    11. Michael Frese & Denise M. Rousseau & Johan Wiklund, 2014. "The Emergence of Evidence–Based Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(2), pages 209-216, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Glavas, Charmaine & Mortimer, Gary & Ding, Han & Grimmer, Louise & Vorobjovas-Pinta, Oscar & Grimmer, Martin, 2023. "How entrepreneurial behaviors manifest in non-traditional, heterodox contexts: Exploration of the Daigou phenomenon," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    2. Thorgren, Sara & Williams, Trenton Alma, 2023. "Progress without a venture? Individual benefits of post-disruption entrepreneuring," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    3. Smith, Brett R. & McMullen, Jeffery S. & Cardon, Melissa S., 2021. "Toward a theological turn in entrepreneurship: How religion could enable transformative research in our field," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    4. Miller, Danny & Le Breton-Miller, Isabelle, 2021. "Brief reflections on family firm research and some suggested paths forward," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1).
    5. Muñoz, Pablo & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "Facing the future through entrepreneurship theory: A prospective inquiry framework," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4).
    6. Jasper Brinkerink, 2023. "When Shooting for the Stars Becomes Aiming for Asterisks: P-Hacking in Family Business Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 304-343, March.
    7. James J. Chrisman & Hanqing C. Fang & Lloyd Steier, 2023. "Positioning, Articulating, and Crafting Conceptual Articles on Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 211-231, March.
    8. Alex Coad & Martin Andersson & Magnus Henrekson & Sarah Jack & Mikael Stenkula & Karin Thorburn & Karl Wennberg & Ivo Zander, 2022. "John Haltiwanger: recipient of the 2020 Global Award for Entrepreneurship Research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 15-25, January.
    9. Chan Timothy Hor, Shoon, 2023. "Why we need design science in entrepreneurship research an idiosyncratic perspective based on the experiences and learnings of an ex-practitioner in training to be an entrepreneurship scholar," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    10. Fernhaber, Stephanie A. & Zou, Huan, 2022. "Advancing societal grand challenge research at the interface of entrepreneurship and international business: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(5).
    11. Elco Van Burg & Joep Cornelissen & Wouter Stam & Sarah Jack, 2022. "Advancing Qualitative Entrepreneurship Research: Leveraging Methodological Plurality for Achieving Scholarly Impact," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(1), pages 3-20, January.
    12. Lévesque, Moren & Subramanian, Annapoornima M., 2022. "Family firm succession through the lens of technology intelligence," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2).
    13. Hyytinen, Ari, 2021. "Shared problem solving and design thinking in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    14. Riad Shams, S.M. & Vrontis, Demetris & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Chavan, Gitesh & Czinkota, Michael R., 2020. "Stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurial development: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 67-86.
    15. Dean A. Shepherd & Johan Wiklund, 2020. "Simple Rules, Templates, and Heuristics! An Attempt to Deconstruct the Craft of Writing an Entrepreneurship Paper," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(3), pages 371-390, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schuster, Charlotte Leonie, 2013. "Entrepreneurship - Methodische Herausforderungen einer jungen Forschungsdisziplin [Entrepreneurship - Methodological challenges of a young research discipline]," MPRA Paper 45472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mark Griffiths & Jill Kickul & Sophie Bacq & Siri Terjesen, 2012. "A Dialogue with William J. Baumol: Insights on Entrepreneurship Theory and Education," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(4), pages 611-625, July.
    3. Erik Lundmark & Alf Westelius, 2014. "Entrepreneurship as Elixir and Mutagen," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(3), pages 575-600, May.
    4. Markku Maula & Wouter Stam, 2020. "Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1059-1090, November.
    5. Coviello, Nicole E. & Jones, Marian V., 2004. "Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 485-508, July.
    6. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    7. Pérez-Centeno, Víctor, 2017. ""It takes three to tango": Brain, cognition and entrepreneurial enhancement," Working Papers 02/17, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    8. Lichtenstein, Benyamin B. & Dooley, Kevin J. & Lumpkin, G.T., 2006. "Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 153-175, March.
    9. Sara Carter, 2011. "The Rewards of Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Incomes, Wealth, and Economic Well–Being of Entrepreneurial Households," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 39-55, January.
    10. Tobias Kollmann & Andreas Kuckertz & Christoph Stöckmann & Patrick Krell, 2012. "Die Entrepreneurshipforschung in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Eine Resonanzanalyse," ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 60(1), pages 53-76.
    11. Ursula Småland Goth & Eldbjørg Marie Schön, 2015. "Teaching Entrepreneurship by Using the “Student Enterprise Model†to Future Vocational Teachers," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 6(1), pages 68-78.
    12. Candida G. Brush & Tatiana S. Manolova & Linda F. Edelman, 2008. "Separated by a Common Language? Entrepreneurship Research across the Atlantic," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(2), pages 249-266, March.
    13. Joao Leitao & Frank Lasch & Roy Thurik, 2011. "Globalisation, entrepreneurship and regional environment," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 129-138.
    14. Jeffery S. McMullen & Katrina M. Brownell & Joel Adams, 2021. "What Makes an Entrepreneurship Study Entrepreneurial? Toward A Unified Theory of Entrepreneurial Agency," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 1197-1238, September.
    15. Dave Bouckenooghe & Dirk De Clercq & Annick Willem & Marc Buelens, 2007. "An Assessment of Validity in Entrepreneurship Research," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 16(2), pages 147-171, July.
    16. Forsström-Tuominen, Heidi & Jussila, Iiro & Kolhinen, Johanna, 2015. "Business school students’ social construction of entrepreneurship: Claiming space for collective entrepreneurship discourses," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 102-120.
    17. Brian L. Connelly & R.D. Ireland & Christopher R. Reutzel & Joseph E. Coombs, 2010. "The Power and Effects of Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(1), pages 131-149, January.
    18. Rosa Caiazza & Maksim Belitski & David B. Audretsch, 2020. "From latent to emergent entrepreneurship: the knowledge spillover construction circle," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 694-704, June.
    19. Harrison, Richard T., 2023. "W(h)ither entrepreneurship? Discipline, legitimacy and super-wicked problems on the road to nowhere," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    20. Woolley Jennifer L., 2011. "Studying the Emergence of New Organizations: Entrepreneurship Research Design," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-28, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    editorial; relevance; agenda;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:43:y:2019:i:3:p:419-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.