IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jouent/v16y2007i2p147-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Assessment of Validity in Entrepreneurship Research

Author

Listed:
  • Dave Bouckenooghe

    (Dave Bouckenooghe is a Ph.D. Scholar with Ghent University, Belgium.)

  • Dirk De Clercq

    (Dirk De Clercq is Assistant Professor of Management with Brock University, Canada.)

  • Annick Willem

    (Annick Willem is Assistant Professor of Management with Ghent University, Belgium.)

  • Marc Buelens

    (Marc Buelens is Professor of Management, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and Ghent University, Belgium.)

Abstract

Based on an analysis of empirical articles published in the highest-rated academic journals between 1999 and 2003, we examined the current state of entrepreneurship research in terms of its validity. We collected 275 relevant publications in order to explore the entrepreneurship field with respect to internal validity, external validity, construct validity and statistical conclusion validity. Our aim was to gain insight into the dominant methodological and statistical practices that currently shape the field, shed light on possible gaps and compare these observations with the findings in general management literature. We found that entrepreneurship studies are mainly cross-sectional using surveys or field study as methods, emphasising external validity. Entrepreneurship research could benefit from more triangulation in research strategies, more advanced analytical techniques and methodologies, and from more longitudinal research resulting in higher validity levels. However, a positive trend towards more longitudinal research and triangulation in data sources is already visible.

Suggested Citation

  • Dave Bouckenooghe & Dirk De Clercq & Annick Willem & Marc Buelens, 2007. "An Assessment of Validity in Entrepreneurship Research," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 16(2), pages 147-171, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jouent:v:16:y:2007:i:2:p:147-171
    DOI: 10.1177/097135570701600202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097135570701600202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097135570701600202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian K. Boyd & Steve Gove & Michael A. Hitt, 2005. "Construct measurement in strategic management research: illusion or reality?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 239-257, March.
    2. Gaylen N. Chandler & Douglas W. Lyon, 2001. "Issues of Research Design and Construct Measurement in Entrepreneurship Research: The past Decade," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 101-113, July.
    3. Per Davidsson, 2004. "Researching Entrepreneurship," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Springer, number 978-0-387-23054-2, December.
    4. Per Davidsson & Johan Wiklund, 2001. "Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 81-100, July.
    5. Neil Churchill & William D. Bygrave, 1989. "The Entrepreneur ship Paradigm (I): A Philosophical Look at Its Research Methodologies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 14(1), pages 7-26, October.
    6. Robert G. Schwartz & Richard D. Teach, 2000. "Research Note: Entrepreneurship Research: An Empirical Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(3), pages 77-81, April.
    7. Ratnatunga, Janek & Romano, Claudio, 1997. "A "citation classics" analysis of articles in contemporary small enterprise research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 197-212, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coviello, Nicole E. & Jones, Marian V., 2004. "Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 485-508, July.
    2. Brian L. Connelly & R.D. Ireland & Christopher R. Reutzel & Joseph E. Coombs, 2010. "The Power and Effects of Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(1), pages 131-149, January.
    3. Schuster, Charlotte Leonie, 2013. "Entrepreneurship - Methodische Herausforderungen einer jungen Forschungsdisziplin [Entrepreneurship - Methodological challenges of a young research discipline]," MPRA Paper 45472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Peter W. Moroz & Kevin Hindle, 2012. "Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(4), pages 781-818, July.
    5. Michelle A. Dean & Christopher L. Shook & G. Tyge Payne, 2007. "The Past, Present, and Future of Entrepreneurship Research: Data Analytic Trends and Training1," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(4), pages 601-618, July.
    6. Per Davidsson, 2023. "Making contributions: personal reflections from the co-creative evolution of entrepreneurship research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1391-1410, December.
    7. Lichtenstein, Benyamin B. & Dooley, Kevin J. & Lumpkin, G.T., 2006. "Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 153-175, March.
    8. Sara Carter, 2011. "The Rewards of Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Incomes, Wealth, and Economic Well–Being of Entrepreneurial Households," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 39-55, January.
    9. Tobias Kollmann & Andreas Kuckertz & Christoph Stöckmann & Patrick Krell, 2012. "Die Entrepreneurshipforschung in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Eine Resonanzanalyse," ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 60(1), pages 53-76.
    10. Candida G. Brush & Tatiana S. Manolova & Linda F. Edelman, 2008. "Separated by a Common Language? Entrepreneurship Research across the Atlantic," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(2), pages 249-266, March.
    11. Johan Wiklund & Mike Wright & Shaker A. Zahra, 2019. "Conquering Relevance: Entrepreneurship Research's Grand Challenge," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(3), pages 419-436, May.
    12. Joao Leitao & Frank Lasch & Roy Thurik, 2011. "Globalisation, entrepreneurship and regional environment," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 129-138.
    13. Kevin Hindle, 2004. "Choosing Qualitative Methods for Entrepreneurial Cognition Research: A Canonical Development Approach," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(6), pages 575-607, November.
    14. Markku Maula & Wouter Stam, 2020. "Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1059-1090, November.
    15. Arnis Sauka & Friederike Welter, 2010. "Productive and Unproductive Entrepreneurship in Latvia," TeliaSonera Institute Discussion papers 6, Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies (BICEPS);Stockholm School of Economics in Riga (SSE Riga).
    16. Woolley Jennifer L., 2011. "Studying the Emergence of New Organizations: Entrepreneurship Research Design," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-28, January.
    17. Forbes, Daniel P. & Kirsch, David A., 2011. "The study of emerging industries: Recognizing and responding to some central problems," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 589-602, September.
    18. Denis A. Grégoire & Martin X. Noël & Richard Déry & Jean–Pierre Béchard, 2006. "Is There Conceptual Convergence in Entrepreneurship Research? A Co–Citation Analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(3), pages 333-373, May.
    19. Frank Lasch & Saïd Yami, 2008. "The Nature and Focus of Entrepreneurship Research in France over the Last Decade: A French Touch?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(2), pages 339-360, March.
    20. Marcus Box, 2008. "The death of firms: exploring the effects of environment and birth cohort on firm survival in Sweden," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 379-393, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jouent:v:16:y:2007:i:2:p:147-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ediindia.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.