IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v35y2024i3p1315-1338.html

Comparison approach for wind resource assessment to determine the most precise approach

Author

Listed:
  • Tasir Khan
  • Ishfaq Ahmad
  • Yejuan Wang
  • Muhammad Salam
  • Amina Shahzadi
  • Masooma Batool

Abstract

The distribution models of wind speed data are essential to assess the potential wind speed energy because they decrease the uncertainty in estimating wind energy output. Therefore, before performing a detailed potential energy analysis, the precise distribution model for data relating to wind speed must be found. This research contains material from numerous goodness-of-fit tests, such as Kolmogorov–Simonov, Anderson–Darling, chi-square, root mean square error, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion, which were combined finally to determine the wind speed of the best-fitted distribution. The suggested method collectively makes each criterion. This method was useful in statistically fitting 14 distribution models to wind speed data collected at four sites in Pakistan. The consequences show that this method provides the best source for selecting the most suitable wind speed statistical distribution. Also, the graphical representation is consistent with the analytical consequences. This research presents three estimation methods that can be used to calculate the different distributions used to estimate the wind. In the suggested maximum likelihood method, method of moments, and maximum likelihood estimation, the third-order moment used in the wind energy formula is a crucial function because it contributes to the precise estimate of wind energy. In order to prove the presence of the suggested method of moments, it was compared with well-known estimation methods, such as the method of linear moments and maximum likelihood estimation. In the relative analysis, given several goodness-of-fit tests, the presentation of the considered techniques is estimated based on the actual wind speed evaluated in different periods. The results show that the method of moments provides a more precise estimation than other commonly used methods for estimating wind energy based on the 14 distributions. Therefore, the method of moments can be a better technique for assessing wind energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Tasir Khan & Ishfaq Ahmad & Yejuan Wang & Muhammad Salam & Amina Shahzadi & Masooma Batool, 2024. "Comparison approach for wind resource assessment to determine the most precise approach," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(3), pages 1315-1338, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:1315-1338
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X221135981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X221135981
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X221135981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Acker, Thomas L. & Williams, Susan K. & Duque, Earl P.N. & Brummels, Grant & Buechler, Jason, 2007. "Wind resource assessment in the state of Arizona: Inventory, capacity factor, and cost," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1453-1466.
    2. Karthikeya, B.R. & Negi, Prabal S. & Srikanth, N., 2016. "Wind resource assessment for urban renewable energy application in Singapore," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 403-414.
    3. Campos, R.M. & Guedes Soares, C., 2018. "Spatial distribution of offshore wind statistics on the coast of Portugal using Regional Frequency Analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 806-816.
    4. Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta & García Montesdeoca, Nuria, 2018. "Spatial planning to estimate the offshore wind energy potential in coastal regions and islands. Practical case: The Canary Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 91-103.
    5. Ayotamuno, M.J. & Kogbara, R.B. & Ogaji, S.O.T. & Probert, S.D., 2006. "Petroleum contaminated ground-water: Remediation using activated carbon," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(11), pages 1258-1264, November.
    6. Fazelpour, Farivar & Markarian, Elin & Soltani, Nima, 2017. "Wind energy potential and economic assessment of four locations in Sistan and Balouchestan province in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 646-667.
    7. Nedaei, Mojtaba & Assareh, Ehsanolah & Walsh, Philip R., 2018. "A comprehensive evaluation of the wind resource characteristics to investigate the short term penetration of regional wind power based on different probability statistical methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 362-374.
    8. Ju-Young Shin & Changsam Jeong & Jun-Haeng Heo, 2018. "A Novel Statistical Method to Temporally Downscale Wind Speed Weibull Distribution Using Scaling Property," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, March.
    9. Mirhosseini, M. & Sharifi, F. & Sedaghat, A., 2011. "Assessing the wind energy potential locations in province of Semnan in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 449-459, January.
    10. Keyhani, A. & Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M. & Khanali, M. & Abbaszadeh, R., 2010. "An assessment of wind energy potential as a power generation source in the capital of Iran, Tehran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 188-201.
    11. Fawad, Muhammad & Yan, Ting & Chen, Lu & Huang, Kangdi & Singh, Vijay P., 2019. "Multiparameter probability distributions for at-site frequency analysis of annual maximum wind speed with L-Moments for parameter estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 724-737.
    12. Saleh, H. & Abou El-Azm Aly, A. & Abdel-Hady, S., 2012. "Assessment of different methods used to estimate Weibull distribution parameters for wind speed in Zafarana wind farm, Suez Gulf, Egypt," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 710-719.
    13. Shoaib, Muhammad & Siddiqui, Imran & Amir, Yousaf Muhammad & Rehman, Saif Ur, 2017. "Evaluation of wind power potential in Baburband (Pakistan) using Weibull distribution function," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1343-1351.
    14. Katinas, Vladislovas & Marčiukaitis, Mantas & Gecevičius, Giedrius & Markevičius, Antanas, 2017. "Statistical analysis of wind characteristics based on Weibull methods for estimation of power generation in Lithuania," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 190-201.
    15. Masseran, Nurulkamal, 2015. "Evaluating wind power density models and their statistical properties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 533-541.
    16. Soukissian, Takvor, 2013. "Use of multi-parameter distributions for offshore wind speed modeling: The Johnson SB distribution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 982-1000.
    17. Li, Yi & Wu, Xiao-Peng & Li, Qiu-Sheng & Tee, Kong Fah, 2018. "Assessment of onshore wind energy potential under different geographical climate conditions in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 498-511.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jianzhou & Huang, Xiaojia & Li, Qiwei & Ma, Xuejiao, 2018. "Comparison of seven methods for determining the optimal statistical distribution parameters: A case study of wind energy assessment in the large-scale wind farms of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 432-448.
    2. Siyavash Filom & Soheil Radfar & Roozbeh Panahi & Erfan Amini & Mehdi Neshat, 2021. "Exploring Wind Energy Potential as a Driver of Sustainable Development in the Southern Coasts of Iran: The Importance of Wind Speed Statistical Distribution Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Saeed, Muhammad Abid & Ahmed, Zahoor & Zhang, Weidong, 2020. "Wind energy potential and economic analysis with a comparison of different methods for determining the optimal distribution parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1092-1109.
    4. Abul Kalam Azad & Mohammad Golam Rasul & Talal Yusaf, 2014. "Statistical Diagnosis of the Best Weibull Methods for Wind Power Assessment for Agricultural Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, May.
    5. Rabbani, Rabab & Zeeshan, Muhammad, 2022. "Impact of policy changes on financial viability of wind power plants in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 789-806.
    6. Jung, Christopher & Schindler, Dirk, 2019. "Wind speed distribution selection – A review of recent development and progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Mekalathur B Hemanth Kumar & Saravanan Balasubramaniyan & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban & Jens Bo Holm-Nielsen, 2019. "Wind Energy Potential Assessment by Weibull Parameter Estimation Using Multiverse Optimization Method: A Case Study of Tirumala Region in India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Ramez Abdallah & Hüseyin Çamur, 2022. "Assessing the Potential of Wind Energy as Sustainable Energy Production in Ramallah, Palestine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Kamranzad, Bahareh & Mafi, Somayeh, 2017. "Wind and wave energy potential in southern Caspian Sea using uncertainty analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 332-345.
    10. Bahrami, Arian & Teimourian, Amir & Okoye, Chiemeka Onyeka & Khosravi, Nima, 2019. "Assessing the feasibility of wind energy as a power source in Turkmenistan; a major opportunity for Central Asia's energy market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 415-427.
    11. Wu, Jie & Wang, Jianzhou & Chi, Dezhong, 2013. "Wind energy potential assessment for the site of Inner Mongolia in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 215-228.
    12. Mehr Gul & Nengling Tai & Wentao Huang & Muhammad Haroon Nadeem & Moduo Yu, 2020. "Evaluation of Wind Energy Potential Using an Optimum Approach based on Maximum Distance Metric," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Mafi, Somayeh & Mazaheri, Said, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 915-929.
    14. Chandel, S.S. & Ramasamy, P. & Murthy, K.S.R, 2014. "Wind power potential assessment of 12 locations in western Himalayan region of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 530-545.
    15. Yahya Z. Alharthi & Mahbube K. Siddiki & Ghulam M. Chaudhry, 2018. "Resource Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of a Grid-Connected Solar PV-Wind Hybrid System for Different Locations in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Saeed, Muhammad Abid & Ahmed, Zahoor & Zhang, Weidong, 2021. "Optimal approach for wind resource assessment using Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic: A case study for large-scale wind farm in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1229-1248.
    17. El Alimi, Souheil & Maatallah, Taher & Dahmouni, Anouar Wajdi & Ben Nasrallah, Sassi, 2012. "Modeling and investigation of the wind resource in the gulf of Tunis, Tunisia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5466-5478.
    18. Rabbani, R. & Zeeshan, M., 2020. "Exploring the suitability of MERRA-2 reanalysis data for wind energy estimation, analysis of wind characteristics and energy potential assessment for selected sites in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1240-1251.
    19. Minaeian, Ali & Sedaghat, Ahmad & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Akbar Alemrajabi, Ali, 2017. "Exploring economy of small communities and households by investing on harnessing wind energy in the province of Sistan-Baluchestan in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 835-847.
    20. Morteza Aien & Omid Mahdavi, 2020. "On the Way of Policy Making to Reduce the Reliance of Fossil Fuels: Case Study of Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-28, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:1315-1338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.