IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v33y2011i1p161-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Hidden System Costs of Wind Generation in a Deregulated Electricity Market

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy D. Mount
  • Surin Maneevitjit
  • Alberto J. Lamadrid
  • Ray D. Zimmerman
  • Robert J. Thomas

Abstract

Earlier research has shown that adding wind generation to a network can lower the total annual operating cost by displacing conventional generation. At the same time, the variability of wind generation and the need for higher levels of reserve generating capacity to maintain reliability standards impose additional costs on the system that should not be ignored. The important implication for regulators is that the capacity payments [“missing money†] for each MW of peak system load are now much higher. Hence, the economic benefits of reducing the peak system load using storage or controllable demand will be higher with high penetrations of wind generation. These potential benefits are illustrated in a case study using a test network and a security constrained Optimal Power Flow (OPF) with endogenous reserves (SuperOPF). The results show that the benefits are very sensitive to 1) how much of the inherent variability of wind generation is mitigated, and 2) how the missing money is determined (e.g. comparing regulation with deregulation). doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-No1-7

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy D. Mount & Surin Maneevitjit & Alberto J. Lamadrid & Ray D. Zimmerman & Robert J. Thomas, 2011. "The Hidden System Costs of Wind Generation in a Deregulated Electricity Market," The Energy Journal, , vol. 33(1), pages 161-186, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:33:y:2011:i:1:p:161-186
    DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-No1-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-No1-6
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-No1-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rothkopf, Michael H., 2007. "Dealing with Failed Deregulation: What Would Price C. Watts Do?," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(7), pages 10-16.
    2. Bird, Lori & Chapman, Caroline & Logan, Jeff & Sumner, Jenny & Short, Walter, 2011. "Evaluating renewable portfolio standards and carbon cap scenarios in the U.S. electric sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2573-2585, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:bla:opecrv:v:32:y:2008:i:2:p:150-183 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Wang, Delu & Li, Chunxiao & Mao, Jinqi & Yang, Qing, 2023. "What affects the implementation of the renewable portfolio standard? An analysis of the four-party evolutionary game," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 250-261.
    3. Yin, Guangzhi & Duan, Maosheng, 2022. "Pricing the deep peak regulation service of coal-fired power plants to promote renewable energy integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    4. James McFarland & Yuyu Zhou & Leon Clarke & Patrick Sullivan & Jesse Colman & Wendy Jaglom & Michelle Colley & Pralit Patel & Jiyon Eom & Son Kim & G. Kyle & Peter Schultz & Boddu Venkatesh & Juanita , 2015. "Impacts of rising air temperatures and emissions mitigation on electricity demand and supply in the United States: a multi-model comparison," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 111-125, July.
    5. Annelys Machado Schetinger & André Frossard Pereira de Lucena, 2025. "Evaluating Policy Frameworks and Their Role in the Sustainable Growth of Distributed Photovoltaic Generation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-32, February.
    6. Yeh, Sonia & Burtraw, Dallas & Sterner, Thomas & Greene, David, 2021. "Tradable performance standards in the transportation sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Schell, Kristen R. & Claro, João & Fischbeck, Paul, 2015. "Geographic attribution of an electricity system renewable energy target: Local economic, social and environmental tradeoffs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 884-902.
    8. Wang, Hongye & Su, Bin & Mu, Hailin & Li, Nan & Jiang, Bo & Kong, Xue, 2019. "Optimization of electricity generation and interprovincial trading strategies in Southern China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 696-707.
    9. Johan Willner & Sonja Gronblom, 2016. "The organisation of services of general interest in Finland," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(3), pages 89-116.
    10. Rouhani, Omid M. & Niemeier, Debbie & Gao, H. Oliver & Bel, Germà, 2016. "Cost-benefit analysis of various California renewable portfolio standard targets: Is a 33% RPS optimal?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1122-1132.
    11. Wang, Tan & Gong, Yu & Jiang, Chuanwen, 2014. "A review on promoting share of renewable energy by green-trading mechanisms in power system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 923-929.
    12. Gacitua, L. & Gallegos, P. & Henriquez-Auba, R. & Lorca, Á. & Negrete-Pincetic, M. & Olivares, D. & Valenzuela, A. & Wenzel, G., 2018. "A comprehensive review on expansion planning: Models and tools for energy policy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 346-360.
    13. Wiser, Ryan & Millstein, Dev & Mai, Trieu & Macknick, Jordan & Carpenter, Alberta & Cohen, Stuart & Cole, Wesley & Frew, Bethany & Heath, Garvin, 2016. "The environmental and public health benefits of achieving high penetrations of solar energy in the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 472-486.
    14. Benjamin, Richard, 2010. "A further inquiry into FTR properties," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3547-3556, July.
    15. Rimšaitė, Laura, 2019. "Corruption risk mitigation in energy sector: Issues and challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 260-266.
    16. Novacheck, Joshua & Johnson, Jeremiah X., 2015. "The environmental and cost implications of solar energy preferences in Renewable Portfolio Standards," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 250-261.
    17. Johan WILLNER & Sonja GRÖNBLOM, 2015. "The Organisation of Services of General Interest in Finland," CIRIEC Working Papers 1520, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    18. Yu, Xianyu & Ge, Shengxian & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Qunwei & Chang, Ching-Ter & Sang, Xiuzhi, 2022. "Whether feed-in tariff can be effectively replaced or not? An integrated analysis of renewable portfolio standards and green certificate trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    19. Wang, Hongye & Su, Bin & Mu, Hailin & Li, Nan & Gui, Shusen & Duan, Ye & Jiang, Bo & Kong, Xue, 2020. "Optimal way to achieve renewable portfolio standard policy goals from the electricity generation, transmission, and trading perspectives in southern China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    20. Ahmadpour, Ali & Mokaramian, Elham & Anderson, Simon, 2021. "The effects of the renewable energies penetration on the surplus welfare under energy policy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1171-1182.
    21. Gaur, Ankita Singh & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Lynch, Muireann & Longoria, Genaro, 2022. "Implications of heating sector electrification on the Irish power system in view of the Climate Action Plan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Electricity markets; Wind generation; Optimum dispatch; Endogenous reserve capacity; Missing money; Total annual system costs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F0 - International Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:33:y:2011:i:1:p:161-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.