IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v26y2025i2p393-417.html

What happened to Putin’s friends? The radical right’s reaction to the Russian invasion on social media

Author

Listed:
  • Chendi Wang

    (Department of Political Science and Public Administration, 1190Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands)

  • Argyrios Altiparmakis

    (Department of Political and Social Sciences, 10185European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy)

Abstract

The Ukrainian crisis has significantly shifted public opinion against Russia and Putin, placing politicians with prior Russian ties in a precarious situation. This paper tracks how parties that had some affinity to Putin have pivoted after the outbreak of war. Through computational text analysis of a decade of Facebook posts from 11 European radical right parties, we investigate their stance evolution towards Russia and their strategic management of public sentiment and Russian relationships. The results show that most radical right parties, after the invasion, neither tried to remain pro-Russia nor focussed their attention on shifting their prior position. Instead, they engaged in blurring the issue, diverting attention away from the war and using the events in Ukraine to assert their anti-EU positions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chendi Wang & Argyrios Altiparmakis, 2025. "What happened to Putin’s friends? The radical right’s reaction to the Russian invasion on social media," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 393-417, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:26:y:2025:i:2:p:393-417
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165251321802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165251321802
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165251321802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandru D Moise & Ioana-Elena Oana & Zbigniew Truchlewski & Chendi Wang, 2025. "Two functionalist logics of European Union polity formation under external threat: Evidence from a conjoint experiment," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 369-392, June.
    2. Ekaterina Zhuravskaya & Maria Petrova & Ruben Enikolopov, 2020. "Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 415-438, August.
    3. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Mitchell A. Orenstein & R. Daniel Kelemen, 2017. "Trojan Horses in EU Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 87-102, January.
    4. Alexandru D Moise & Chendi Wang, 2025. "Appeasement or solidarity? Uncovering the drivers of European public opinion on the EU’s foreign policy," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 418-441, June.
    5. Liesbet Hooghe & Gary Marks & Ryan Bakker & Seth Jolly & Jonathan Polk & Jan Rovny & Marco Steenbergen & Milada Anna Vachudova, 2024. "The Russian threat and the consolidation of the West: How populism and EU-skepticism shape party support for Ukraine," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(3), pages 459-482, September.
    6. Christoffer Green-Pedersen & Peter B. Mortensen, 2015. "Avoidance and Engagement: Issue Competition in Multiparty Systems," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 63(4), pages 747-764, October.
    7. Grimmer, Justin & Messing, Solomon & Westwood, Sean J., 2012. "How Words and Money Cultivate a Personal Vote: The Effect of Legislator Credit Claiming on Constituent Credit Allocation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 106(4), pages 703-719, November.
    8. Elena Chebankova, 2016. "Contemporary Russian conservatism," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 28-54, January.
    9. Katharina Bluhm & Mihai Varga, 2020. "Conservative Developmental Statism in East Central Europe and Russia," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 642-659, June.
    10. Bestvater, Samuel E. & Monroe, Burt L., 2023. "Sentiment is Not Stance: Target-Aware Opinion Classification for Political Text Analysis," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 235-256, April.
    11. Wouter van der Brug & Katjana Gattermann & Claes H. de Vreese, 2022. "Electoral responses to the increased contestation over European integration. The European Elections of 2019 and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-20, March.
    12. Hooghe, Liesbet & Marks, Gary, 2009. "A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 1-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philipp Genschel, 2025. "Conclusion – external threat and internal divisions: How the war in Ukraine shapes mass politics in the EU," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 442-450, June.
    2. Aleksandra Sojka & Javier Terraza & Francisco Caravaca Crespo & à ngel Cuevas Rumín, 2025. "Russian invasion as a European issue: Vertical Europeanisation of national political debates and the war in Ukraine," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 310-343, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandru D. Moise & Chendi Wang, 2025. "Division and unity: Voter and party perspectives on EU integration under external threat," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 296-309, June.
    2. Philipp Genschel, 2025. "Conclusion – external threat and internal divisions: How the war in Ukraine shapes mass politics in the EU," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 442-450, June.
    3. Ioana-Elena Oana & Alexandru D Moise & Zbigniew Truchlewski, 2025. "Demand-side constraints on European solidarity for energy sanctions: Experimental evidence from seven EU countries," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 344-368, June.
    4. Thomas M. Meyer & Katjana Gattermann, 2022. "Party contestation and news visibility abroad: The 2019 European Parliament election from a pan-European perspective," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(3), pages 398-416, September.
    5. Grande, Edgar & Schwarzbözl, Tobias & Fatke, Matthias, 2019. "Politicizing immigration in Western Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(10), pages 1444-1463.
    6. Alexandru D Moise & Chendi Wang, 2025. "Appeasement or solidarity? Uncovering the drivers of European public opinion on the EU’s foreign policy," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 418-441, June.
    7. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    8. Lisanne de Blok & Max Heermann & Julian Schuessler & Dirk Leuffen & Catherine E. de Vries, 2024. "All on board? The role of institutional design for public support for differentiated integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(3), pages 593-604, September.
    9. Julian Aichholzer & Sylvia Kritzinger & Carolina Plescia, 2021. "National identity profiles and support for the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(2), pages 293-315, June.
    10. Marco Manacorda & Guido Tabellini & Andrea Tesei, 2022. "Mobile internet and the rise of political tribalism in Europe," CEP Discussion Papers dp1877, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    11. Luuk Middelaar, 2016. "The Return of Politics – The European Union after the crises in the eurozone and Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 495-507, May.
    12. Habermann, Judita, 2021. "Self-control and social media addiction (Facebook):a quantitative analysis," MPRA Paper 108483, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Soetkin Verhaegen & Marc Hooghe & Ellen Quintelier, 2014. "European Identity and Support for European Integration: A Matter of Perceived Economic Benefits?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 295-314, May.
    14. Aytimur, R. Emre & Suen, Richard M. H., 2024. "Information Quality, Disagreement and Political Polarisation," MPRA Paper 121112, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Éltető Andrea & Szemlér Tamás, 2023. "Hungary in the European Union – Cooperation, Peacock Dance and Autocracy," Comparative Southeast European Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 71(3), pages 272-299, September.
    16. Wolfram Kaiser, 2017. "Limits of Cultural Engineering: Actors and Narratives in the European Parliament's House of European History Project," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 518-534, May.
    17. Natascha Zaun & Ariadna Ripoll Servent, 2023. "Perpetuating Crisis as a Supply Strategy: The Role of (Nativist) Populist Governments in EU Policymaking on Refugee Distribution," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 653-672, May.
    18. Rauh, Christian, 2015. "Communicating supranational governance? The salience of EU affairs in the German Bundestag, 1991–2013," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 116-138.
    19. Joël Cariolle & Yasmine Elkhateeb & Mathilde Maurel, 2022. "(Mis-)information technology: Internet use and perception of democracy in Africa," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22010, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    20. Mikko Mattila & Tapio Raunio, 2026. "Still Out of Touch? Parties and Their Voters on the EU Dimension," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:26:y:2025:i:2:p:393-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.