IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v26y2025i2p418-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appeasement or solidarity? Uncovering the drivers of European public opinion on the EU’s foreign policy

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru D Moise

    (Department of Political and Social Sciences, 10185European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy)

  • Chendi Wang

    (Department of Political Science and Public Administration, 1190Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands)

Abstract

The Russian invasion of Ukraine, with its implications for European security, has intensified the need to understand European public opinion on potential conflict strategies. This study delves into the formation of these opinions, focusing on utilitarian factors like economic interests and threat perception, and ideological elements such as political orientation, national identity and perceptions of Russia and Ukraine. Utilising a two-wave panel survey from five European Union (EU) countries, our findings underscore that ideological factors, especially trust in Russia and Ukraine are paramount in shaping support for escalation or de-escalation. Economic concerns, threat perceptions, right-wing ideologies and strong national identities also play significant roles. This research not only illuminates European sentiment on the war in Ukraine but also enriches broader discussions on the determinants of public opinion in international conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru D Moise & Chendi Wang, 2025. "Appeasement or solidarity? Uncovering the drivers of European public opinion on the EU’s foreign policy," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(2), pages 418-441, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:26:y:2025:i:2:p:418-441
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165251320837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165251320837
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165251320837?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:26:y:2025:i:2:p:418-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.