IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v14y2026a10897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Still Out of Touch? Parties and Their Voters on the EU Dimension

Author

Listed:
  • Mikko Mattila

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland)

  • Tapio Raunio

    (Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Finland)

Abstract

Previous research has uncovered a significant mismatch between parties and their voters on the EU dimension, showing that parties across the EU typically support more European integration than their electorates. Yet there are good theoretical reasons to expect that the gap has narrowed over time. The breakthrough of so-called challenger parties means more ideological alternatives, and the multiple crises have resulted in further politicization of European integration. But both the supply of parties and the impact of crises vary between member states. Utilizing EES survey data from European elections, this article studies opinion congruence between parties and their voters on the EU dimension in the five European Parliament elections conducted in the early 21st century. The findings underline the change in the overall congruence that has taken place in the last two EP elections. Especially, in the latest 2024 elections, the congruence on the EU dimension was practically on the same level as congruence on the left–right dimension, implying that party responsiveness in EU matters is no longer such a major problem as in the beginning of the millennium.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikko Mattila & Tapio Raunio, 2026. "Still Out of Touch? Parties and Their Voters on the EU Dimension," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:10897
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.10897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10897
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.10897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:10897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.