IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v21y2000i2p147-182.html

Industrial Democracy and Institutional Environments: A Comparison of Germany and Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Tzu-Shian Han

    (National ChengChi University, Taiwan)

  • Su-fen Chiu

    (National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Facing economic liberalization and industrial restructuring since the mid-1980s, Taiwan's labour has been advocating the idea of industrial democracy. The German co-determination system has been admired as a model to emulate by some of Taiwan's labour activists. Although the demand for workplace democracy in Taiwan seems to be promising given recent economic pressures and political democratization, the future realization of this notion remains in doubt due to the lack of complementary institutional environments in which the German co-determination system is embedded. This article identifies seven key institutional factors affecting the making of industrial democracy, which consist of cultural values and ideologies, labour power, strategies of capital, the role of the state, the legal system, participatory structures and labour education. Using a historical comparative approach, this article compares the differences in these institutional factors and explains the relative effectiveness of the realization of industrial democracy between these two societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzu-Shian Han & Su-fen Chiu, 2000. "Industrial Democracy and Institutional Environments: A Comparison of Germany and Taiwan," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 21(2), pages 147-182, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:21:y:2000:i:2:p:147-182
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X00212003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X00212003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X00212003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfgang Streeck, 1995. "Works Councils in Western Europe: From Consultation to Participation," NBER Chapters, in: Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, pages 313-350, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Joel Rogers & Wolfgang Streeck, 1995. "Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number roge95-1, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J.E. van den Berg, 2003. "The Dutch Works Council from an Institutional Economics Point of View: An Efficient Solution to the Governance Structure Problem?," Working Papers 03-06, Utrecht School of Economics.
    2. Ida Regalia, 1997. "Managerial strategies and trade unions in the company environment," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 3(3), pages 551-577, November.
    3. Jürgens, Ulrich & Lippert, Inge, 2005. "Kommunikation und Wissen im Aufsichtsrat: Voraussetzungen und Kriterien guter Aufsichtsratsarbeit aus der Perspektive leitender Angestellter," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2005-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Steffen Mueller, 2012. "Works Councils and Establishment Productivity," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 65(4), pages 880-898, October.
    5. Felix FitzRoy & Kornelius Kraft, 2005. "Co‐determination, Efficiency and Productivity," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(2), pages 233-247, June.
    6. Ziltener, Patrick & Gabathuler, Heinz, 2018. "Betriebliche Mitwirkung in der Schweiz – eine Untersuchung der Bestimmungen in Gesamtarbeitsverträgen [Workplace-level employee participation in Switzerland – an inquiry of provisions in collective," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 25(1), pages 5-26.
    7. Niamh Hardiman, 2006. "Politics and Social Partnership - Flexible Network Governance," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 37(3), pages 343-374.
    8. Markey, R. & Pomfret, S., 2001. "Managers' Perceptions of Cooperation and Joint Decision-Making with Trade Unions: A Regional Case Study in the Illawarra (Australia)," Economics Working Papers wp01-13, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    9. van den Berg, Annette & Grift, Yolanda K. & Sapulete, Saraï & Brehmer, Wolfram & Behrens, Martin & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen, 2019. "Work councils in Germany and the Netherlands compared: An explorative study using an input-throughput-output approach," WSI Studies 17, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    10. Robert Boyer, 2005. "What future for codetermination and corporate governance in Germany?," PSE Working Papers halshs-00590710, HAL.
    11. Christian Pfeifer, 2023. "Can worker codetermination stabilize democracies? Works councils and satisfaction with democracy in Germany," Working Paper Series in Economics 420, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    12. Steffen Mueller, 2009. "The Productivity Effect of Non-Union Representation," Working Papers 074, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    13. Freeman, Richard B., 1998. "War of the models: Which labour market institutions for the 21st century?1," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, March.
    14. repec:ces:ifodic:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:19189887 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Deakin, S. & Koukiadaki, A., 2011. "Capability Theory, Employee Voice and Corporate Restructuring: Evidence from UK Case Studies," Working Papers wp429, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    16. Uwe Jirjahn & Jens Mohrenweiser & Uschi Backes‐Gellner, 2011. "Works Councils and Learning: On the Dynamic Dimension of Codetermination," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 427-447, August.
    17. Jennifer Hunt, 1998. "Hours Reductions as Work-Sharing," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 29(1), pages 339-381.
    18. Uwe JIRJAHN & Stephen C. SMITH, 2018. "Nonunion Employee Representation: Theory And The German Experience With Mandated Works Councils," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 201-233, March.
    19. Fathi Fakhfakh & Virginie Pérotin & Andrew Robinson, 2011. "Workplace Change and Productivity: Does Employee Voice Make a Difference?," Chapters, in: Susan Hayter (ed.), The Role of Collective Bargaining in the Global Economy, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Beckmann, Michael & Kräkel, Matthias, 2012. "Internal rent seeking, works councils, and optimal establishment size," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 711-726.
    21. Uwe Jirjahn & Jens Mohrenweiser & Stephen C Smith, 2022. "Works councils and workplace health promotion in Germany," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(3), pages 1059-1094, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:21:y:2000:i:2:p:147-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.