IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v51y2026i1p264-290.html

Solving the paradox of Lean Management’s low success rate

Author

Listed:
  • Danny Samson
  • William Ho
  • Zahra Seyedghorban

    (Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia)

  • Diana Bevington

    (Bevington Partners, Melbourne, VIC, Australia)

  • Sally Kelly

    (Bunnings, Melbourne, VIC, Australia)

Abstract

This study investigates problems related to the high variance in the success rate of lean implementations, using a unique data set from a specific approach to implementing lean. We develop insights about how to effectively resolve the ‘Lean paradox’, namely that Lean concepts promise so much in theory yet deliver infrequently in practice. Our primary data of 268 Lean implementation initiatives illuminates the core elements of lean implementation success that explain this success variance. We present an in-depth case study of that specific method of lean implementation. Lean implementation success occurs when specific processes are followed, namely integration of job role and process analysis, comprehensive end-to-end deployment rather than spot-based problem solving, use of operator-based data about processes and waste, detailed level of data and change deployment focussed on waste reduction, and ongoing measurement and control of process changes. These ‘how’ factors provide both conceptual and practical insights for managers. JEL Classification: M11

Suggested Citation

  • Danny Samson & William Ho & Zahra Seyedghorban & Diana Bevington & Sally Kelly, 2026. "Solving the paradox of Lean Management’s low success rate," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 51(1), pages 264-290, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:51:y:2026:i:1:p:264-290
    DOI: 10.1177/03128962241312725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03128962241312725
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/03128962241312725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maurizio Bevilacqua & Filippo Emanuele Ciarapica & Ilaria De Sanctis, 2017. "Lean practices implementation and their relationships with operational responsiveness and company performance: an Italian study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 769-794, February.
    2. Titov Sergei & Trachuk Arkady & Linder Natalya & RD Pathak & Danny Samson & Zafar Husain & S Sushil, 2023. "Digital transformation enablers in high-tech and low-tech companies: A comparative analysis," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(4), pages 801-843, November.
    3. Naga Vamsi Krishna Jasti & Rambabu Kodali, 2015. "Lean production: literature review and trends," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 867-885, February.
    4. Qi Feng & Chengzhang Li & Mengshi Lu & Jeyaveerasingam George Shanthikumar, 2022. "Dynamic Substitution for Selling Multiple Products under Supply and Demand Uncertainties," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1645-1662, April.
    5. Stephen C. Graves & Brian T. Tomlin & Sean P. Willems, 2022. "Supply chain challenges in the post–Covid Era," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4319-4332, December.
    6. Wallace J. Hopp, 2018. "Positive lean: merging the science of efficiency with the psychology of work," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 398-413, January.
    7. Rahman, Shams-ur & Bullock, Philip, 2005. "Soft TQM, hard TQM, and organisational performance relationships: an empirical investigation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 73-83, February.
    8. Bortolotti, Thomas & Boscari, Stefania & Danese, Pamela, 2015. "Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 182-201.
    9. Roger W. Schmenner, 2015. "The Pursuit of Productivity," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(2), pages 341-350, February.
    10. Mark L. Spearman & Wallace J. Hopp, 2021. "The Case for a Unified Science of Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 802-814, March.
    11. Wallace J. Hopp & Mark L. Spearman, 2004. "To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 133-148, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcel F. Assen, 2018. "The moderating effect of management behavior for Lean and process improvement," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Xue, Xingnan & Hu, Nan & Qiu, Fangjuan & Li, Gang, 2025. "Chief operating officers’ long-term orientation and corporate lean production," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    4. Ghobadian, Abby & Talavera, Irene & Bhattacharya, Arijit & Kumar, Vikas & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & O'Regan, Nicholas, 2020. "Examining legitimatisation of additive manufacturing in the interplay between innovation, lean manufacturing and sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 457-468.
    5. Florian Magnani & Valentina Carbone & Valérie Moatti, 2019. "The human dimension of lean: a literature review," Post-Print hal-03349359, HAL.
    6. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2023. "The relationships between soft and hard factors of the Toyota way: a socio-technical perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 768-779, June.
    7. Diego A. J. Pacheco & José Antonio Valle Antunes & Isaac Pergher & Mihai Vrîncuț, 2025. "The role of Lean for reconciling performance paradoxes in operations and supply chains management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 144-163, March.
    8. Jorge Iván Pérez-Rave & Rafael Fernández Guerrero & Andrés Salas Vallina & Favián González Echavarría, 2023. "A measurement model of dynamic capabilities of the continuous improvement project and its role in the renewal of the company’s products/services," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 126-140, March.
    9. Hardcopf, Rick & Liu, Gensheng (Jason) & Shah, Rachna, 2021. "Lean production and operational performance: The influence of organizational culture," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. , Le Nguyen Hoang, 2022. "A multi-group analysis of the impact of lean manufacturing practices on operational performance: Does the national culture matter?," OSF Preprints qpe63, Center for Open Science.
    11. Marodin, Giuliano & Frank, Alejandro Germán & Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Netland, Torbjørn, 2018. "Lean product development and lean manufacturing: Testing moderation effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 301-310.
    12. Renu Agarwal & Christopher Bajada & Paul James Brown & Roy Green, 2021. "People Management Practices that Underpin Lean Management Outcomes," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 75-94, June.
    13. Cadden, Trevor & Millar, Keith & Treacy, Raymond & Humphreys, Paul, 2020. "The mediating influence of organisational cultural practices in successful lean management implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2021. "Assessing lean satisfaction and its enablers: a care provider perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 95-106, June.
    15. Qamar, A. & Gardner, E.C. & Buckley, T. & Zhao, K., 2021. "Home-owned versus foreign-owned firms in the UK automotive industry: Exploring the microfoundations of ambidextrous production and supply chain positioning," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    16. María Mojarro-Magaña & Jesús Everardo Olguín-Tiznado & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Claudia Camargo-Wilson & Juan Andrés López-Barreras & Rubén Jesús Pérez-López, 2018. "Impact of the Planning from the Kanban System on the Company’s Operating Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Scherrer-Rathje, Maike & Boyle, Todd A. & Deflorin, Patricia, 2009. "Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 79-88.
    18. Yefei Yang & Jiayi Chen & Ciwei Dong & Yuemeng Xu, 2026. "Process switching strategies for sustainable production of personal protective equipment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(1), pages 555-580, April.
    19. Miriam Pekarcikova & Peter Trebuna & Marek Kliment & Michal Dic, 2021. "Solution of Bottlenecks in the Logistics Flow by Applying the Kanban Module in the Tecnomatix Plant Simulation Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2018. "Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory," Post-Print hal-03080217, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:51:y:2026:i:1:p:264-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.