IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anjomc/v3y2006i1p5-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflict Management Strategies of Administrators and Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Refik Balay

Abstract

This study was conducted to understand the conflict management strategies of administrators and teachers. Data was collected from a sample of randomly selected 250 school administrators and teachers working in seventeen primary schools, public and private, in the Van province of East Anatolia, Turkey. Three conflict management strategies (competing, avoiding, and compromising) were examined in terms of task and school type. Results indicated that administrators are more likely to use avoiding and compromising strategies than teachers. Moreover, both administrators and teachers at private primary schools tend to use compromising, avoiding and competing behaviours than their colleagues at public schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Refik Balay, 2006. "Conflict Management Strategies of Administrators and Teachers," Asian Journal of Management Cases, , vol. 3(1), pages 5-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anjomc:v:3:y:2006:i:1:p:5-24
    DOI: 10.1177/097282010500300103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097282010500300103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097282010500300103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tjosvold, Dean & Hui, Chun & Law, Kenneth S., 2001. "Constructive conflict in China: cooperative conflict as a bridge between East and West," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 166-183, July.
    2. Tinsley, Catherine H. & Brett, Jeanne M., 2001. "Managing Workplace Conflict in the United States and Hong Kong," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 360-381, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Curhan, Jared R. & Neale, Margaret A. & Ross, Lee & Rosencranz-Engelmann, Jesse, 2008. "Relational accommodation in negotiation: Effects of egalitarianism and gender on economic efficiency and relational capital," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 192-205, November.
    2. Muethel, Miriam & Hoegl, Martin, 2012. "The influence of social institutions on managers’ concept of trust: Implications for trust-building in Sino-German relationships," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 420-434.
    3. Christopher Robertson & Bradley Olson & K. Gilley & Yongjian Bao, 2008. "A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Orientations and Willingness to Sacrifice Ethical Standards: China Versus Peru," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 413-425, August.
    4. Xiang Qian, 2021. "How Executives Manage Interpersonal Conflicts in Chinese Companies in Germany: Intercultural Difference in Conflict Management Styles," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 182-182, July.
    5. Yen, Dorothy Ai-wan & Abosag, Ibrahim, 2016. "Localization in China: How guanxi moderates Sino–US business relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5724-5734.
    6. Shibrie Jorga Tessema & Sun Jin & Melaku Mengistu, 2021. "Management of Interpersonal Conflict in Teacher Education Colleges in Amhara State, Ethiopia," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(7), pages 233-252.
    7. Gelbrich, Katja & Müller, Stefan, 2008. "Konfliktstile im interkulturellen Vergleich," Ilmenauer Schriften zur Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, volume 5, number 52008.
    8. Lau, Chung-Ming & Fan, Dennis K.K. & Young, Michael N. & Wu, Shukun, 2007. "Corporate governance effectiveness during institutional transition," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 425-448, August.
    9. Zhang, Zhi-Xue & Liu, Leigh Anne & Ma, Li, 2021. "Negotiation beliefs: Comparing Americans and the Chinese," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    10. Steven C. Hertler, 2015. "Toward a Biology of Collectivism," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    11. Raphael Schoen, 2021. "Lacking pluralism? A critical review of the use of cultural dimensions in negotiation research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 393-432, April.
    12. Jungwon Yeo & Claire Connolly Knox & Kyujin Jung, 2018. "Unveiling cultures in emergency response communication networks on social media: following the 2016 Louisiana floods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 519-535, March.
    13. Fainshmidt, Stav & White, George O. & Cangioni, Carole, 2014. "Legal Distance, Cognitive Distance, and Conflict Resolution in International Business Intellectual Property Disputes," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 188-200.
    14. Haq, Mahin & Moazzam, Muhammad & Khan, Abdul Salam & Ahmed, Waqas, 2023. "The impact of reverse logistics process coordination on third party relationship quality: A moderated mediation model for multichannel retailers in the fashion industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anjomc:v:3:y:2006:i:1:p:5-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.