IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecosci/es1911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate venture capital investments: features and successful practices
[Корпоративные Венчурные Инвестиции: Особенности И Успешные Практики]

Author

Listed:
  • Zinov, V.G. (Зинов, В.Г.)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Yeremchenko, O.A. (Ерёмченко, О.А.)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

The review of domestic and foreign publications presents successful practices of corporate venture investment, which allow to clarify sustainability criteria and requirements for achieving stable functioning of corporate funds. It is shown that the coherence of the fund’s goals with the goals of the parent company, continuity of operation, continuity in relation to strategy, investment focus and the main team, as well as financial stability, which allows us to be a stable partner to portfolio companies throughout their entire life cycle, are of fundamental importance. It is emphasized that corporate venture investments are not an instrument of financial speculation, and the parent company needs the created venture fund, first, as an instrument for search, development, transfer of technologies, products and customers. The main differences between corporate and so-called independent venture capital funds, reflecting various goals, areas of activity, sources of financing, legal status, management remuneration systems and accountability, are examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Zinov, V.G. (Зинов, В.Г.) & Yeremchenko, O.A. (Ерёмченко, О.А.), 2019. "Corporate venture capital investments: features and successful practices [Корпоративные Венчурные Инвестиции: Особенности И Успешные Практики]," Economy of science, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 170-184, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecosci:es1911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecosci/es1911.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Dushnitsky & Zur Shapira, 2010. "Entrepreneurial finance meets organizational reality: comparing investment practices and performance of corporate and independent venture capitalists," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(9), pages 990-1017, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bing Guo & Yun Lou & David Pérez‐Castrillo, 2015. "Investment, Duration, and Exit Strategies for Corporate and Independent Venture Capital‐Backed Start‐Ups," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 415-455, June.
    2. Daniel Reimsbach & Bastian Hauschild, 2012. "Corporate venturing: an extended typology," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 71-80, September.
    3. Andrieu, Guillaume & Groh, Alexander Peter, 2012. "Entrepreneurs' financing choice between independent and bank-affiliated venture capital firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 1143-1167.
    4. Balz, Frank P. & Brinkmann, Florian & Kanbach, Dominik K., 2023. "The impact of independent and heterogeneous corporate venture capital on firm efficiency," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    5. Johansson Jeaneth M. & Malmstrom Malin, 2013. "The Business Model Transparency Paradox in Innovative Growth Ventures: Trade-offs between Competitive Advantages and Agency Costs," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 238-263, January.
    6. Patrick Haslanger & Erik E. Lehmann & Nikolaus Seitz, 2023. "The performance effects of corporate venture capital: a meta-analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2132-2160, December.
    7. Sunny Li Sun & Mike W. Peng & Weiqiang Tan, 2017. "Institutional relatedness behind product diversification and international diversification," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 339-366, June.
    8. Jeon, Euiju & Maula, Markku, 2022. "Progress toward understanding tensions in corporate venture capital: A systematic review," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    9. Petrit Ademi & Monika C. Schuhmacher & Andrew L. Zacharakis, 2023. "Evaluating Affordance-Based Opportunities: A Conjoint Experiment of Corporate Venture Capital Managers’ Decision-Making," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2293-2322, November.
    10. Pan, Lingling & Li, Xiumei & Chen, Jianhong & Chen, Tianxu, 2020. "Sounds novel or familiar? Entrepreneurs' framing strategy in the venture capital market," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    11. Zeng, Fue & Huang, Ying & Xiao, Zhenxin & Wang, Cheng Lu & Dong, Maggie Chuoyan, 2021. "The dark side of channel rewards for observer distributors: A social comparison perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 441-452.
    12. Cheng, Chun-Yun & Tang, Ming-Je, 2019. "Partner-selection effects on venture capital investment performance with uncertainties," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 242-252.
    13. Sang Yoon Shin, 2019. "Network advantage’s effect on exit performance: examining venture capital’s inter-organizational networks," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 21-42, March.
    14. Takahashi, Hidenori & Yamakawa, Yasuhiro & Mathew, Prem G., 2018. "Board members' influence on resource investments to start-ups and IPO outcomes: Does prior affiliation matter?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 30-42.
    15. Patrick Röhm, 2018. "Exploring the landscape of corporate venture capital: a systematic review of the entrepreneurial and finance literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 279-319, August.
    16. Kou, Mingting & Yang, Yuanqi & Chen, Kaihua, 2020. "The impact of external R&D financing on innovation process from a supply-demand perspective," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 375-387.
    17. Elisa Alvarez-Garrido & Gary Dushnitsky, 2016. "Are entrepreneurial venture's innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 819-834, May.
    18. Michael Greiner & Jing Sun, 2021. "How corporate social responsibility can incentivize top managers: A commitment to sustainability as an agency intervention," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1360-1375, July.
    19. Rin, Marco Da & Hellmann, Thomas & Puri, Manju, 2013. "A Survey of Venture Capital Research," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 573-648, Elsevier.
    20. Martin Ganco, 2013. "Cutting the Gordian knot: The effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 666-686, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate venture capital investment; venture capital; venture capital fund; corporate venture capital fund; startups; mergers and acquisitions; trends;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O4 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecosci:es1911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.