IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition of Economic Journals in Russia: Results of the Three Waves of Ranking

Author

Listed:
  • Balatsky, Evgeny V.

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation)

  • Ekimova, Natalia A.

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation)

Abstract

The article discusses the dynamics of the list of the leading economic journals of the country in the Ranking of the Leading Economic Journals in 2013–2015 created by the authors with the support of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation in the framework of the annual monitoring and ranking of the market of economic research. The authors show instability of the market of economic journals and identify publications that consistently hold the leading position. There are several qualitatively heterogeneous groups of periodicals in the Russian market of trade magazines which include magazines-aggressors and stagnating periodicals. That allows us to make a conclusion about high intensity of the competitive struggle in the market of economic journals stabilization of which can be expected not earlier than in 3–4 years. The article also examines the struggle for international status which is unfolding parallel to the struggle for a place in the Russian magazines market. We trace connection between scientific quality and reputation of journals on the basis of external expert survey of the country’s leading economists held for the purpose of implementing a limited verification of the generated rating of the product. We draw a paradoxical conclusion that the scientific level of a journal depends on its reputation (popularity). The article gives an economic interpretation of the revealed connection and provides its illustrative examples; the distinction between the reputation of a magazine and people’s wishes to be published in it is also examined. The authors dwell on typical errors that impede the success of economic journals and reveal their nature and importance using specific examples. The most common mistakes are: ill-considered name of a magazine; disregard of academic aesthetics; failure to fulfill the criterion of an All-Russia periodical; shortcomings of the content-policy; failures in peer review.

Suggested Citation

  • Balatsky, Evgeny V. & Ekimova, Natalia A., 2017. "Competition of Economic Journals in Russia: Results of the Three Waves of Ranking," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 178-201, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://w82.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1768.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Balatsky & N. Ekimova., 2015. "The Experience of Ranking Russian Economic Journals," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 8.
    2. Shumilov, Andrei & Balatsky, Evgeny, 2016. "Академические рейтинги RePEc: вопросы построения и роль российских участников
      [RePEc Academic Rankings: Construction Issues and the Role of Russian Participants]
      ," MPRA Paper 70956, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P. & Moya-Anegón, Félix, 2012. "A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 674-688.
    4. Per Krusell & Anthony A. Smith Jr., 2015. "Is Piketty's "Second Law of Capitalism" Fundamental?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 123(4), pages 725-748.
    5. Fuad T. Aleskerov & Vladimir V. Pislyakov & Andrey N. Subochev, 2014. "Ranking Journals In Economics, Management And Political Science By Social Choice Theory Methods," HSE Working papers WP BRP 27/STI/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    6. Kenneth J. Arrow & Herve Raynaud, 1986. "Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262511754.
    7. Lawrence E. Blume & Steven N. Durlauf, 2015. "Capital in the Twenty-First Century: A Review Essay," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 123(4), pages 749-777.
    8. Glaeser, Edward L, 1992. "The Cinderella Paradox Resolved," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(2), pages 430-432, April.
    9. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "Ранжирование Российских Экономических Журналов: Научный Метод Или «Игра В Цыфирь»?
      [Ran Ranking of Russian Economic Journals: The Scientific Method or “Numbers Game”?]
      ," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2016:1, Institute of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    market of economic journals; ranking; academic level; academic reputation.;

    JEL classification:

    • C65 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.