IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v4y2012i7p379-390.html

New Challenges in Corporate Governance: Linking M&A and Social Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Tea Golja

Abstract

Answers to the questions of successful business models can be found in various strategies, amongst which mergers and acquisitions are considered as good growth strategies if implemented successfully. Corporate governance is seen as control mechanism dependent on the legal, regulatory, institutional and ethical environment of the community. Thus, authors emphasize that without considering the social aspects of business, leaders cannot lead the business in the right direction, but vice versa. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A’s), as one option for the company’s development could bring both positive, but as well as negative consequences for the target and the acquirer company. Corporate governance mechanisms, social responsibility and the importance of their adequate combination in the processes of merging and acquiring new company pervades in this paper. The paper brings insights on corporate social responsibility and the way its effective implementation supported by governance mechanisms can create a “snowball effect†of positive social changes. A special focus was put on M&A and its incremental value for the company’s development and growth. Important figures in the field of M&A are provided. A deep theoretical background is provided in the field arisen out of detailed literature review and practical experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Tea Golja, 2012. "New Challenges in Corporate Governance: Linking M&A and Social Responsibility," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 4(7), pages 379-390.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:4:y:2012:i:7:p:379-390
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v4i7.992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/992/992
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/992
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v4i7.992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Logsdon, Jeanne M. & Wood, Donna J., 2002. "Business Citizenship: From Domestic to Global Level of Analysis," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 155-187, April.
    2. Andy Lockett & Jeremy Moon & Wayne Visser, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 115-136, January.
    3. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    4. Tea Golja & Morena Paulisic, 2010. "Corporate governance, social responsibility and corporate reputation: an empirical analysis of the situation in Croatia," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 368-384.
    5. Schwartz, Mark S. & Carroll, Archie B., 2003. "Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 503-530, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michał Jurek, 2014. "The genesis and evolution of CSR self-regulation with special refer-ence to the case of financial institutions," Working papers wpaper70, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    2. Dominik Aaken & Florian Buchner, 2020. "Religion and CSR: a systematic literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 917-945, June.
    3. Bodo B. Schlegelmilch & Ilona Szőcs, 2015. "Corporate philanthropy and ethicality: two opposing notions?," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 16, pages 317-353, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Repaul Kanji & Rajat Agrawal, 2016. "Models of Corporate Social Responsibility: Comparison, Evolution and Convergence," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 5(2), pages 141-155, July.
    5. Kunapatarawong, Rasi & Martínez-Ros, Ester, 2013. "Influences of institutional pressures on corporate social responsibility attitude and corporate social responsibility outcomes," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb130301, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    6. A. Bennett, 2011. "Learning to Be Job Ready: Strategies for Greater Social Inclusion in Public Sector Employment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 347-359, December.
    7. Bongani Munkuli & Renee Horne, 2018. "Financial Markets Value Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – A Study of the South African Mining Sector," Africagrowth Agenda, Africagrowth Institute, vol. 15(2), pages 17-22.
    8. Natalia Yakovleva & Diego Vazquez-Brust, 2012. "Stakeholder Perspectives on CSR of Mining MNCs in Argentina," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(2), pages 191-211, March.
    9. Egle Jakunskiene, 2021. "Assessment of the Impact of Social Responsibility on Poverty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Meyer, Margit & Waßmann, Jan, 2011. "Strategische Corporate Social Responsibility. Konzeptionelle Entwicklung und Implementierung in der Praxis am Beispiel 'dm-drogerie markt'," Research Papers on Marketing Strategy 3/2011, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Lehrstuhl für BWL und Marketing.
    11. Anesa, Mattia & Bressan, Alessandro, 2024. "SMEs tax minimization as shared responsibility," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Juelin Yin & Yuli Zhang, 2012. "Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 301-316, December.
    13. Roberto Fernández‐Gago & Laura Cabeza‐García & José‐Luis Godos‐Díez, 2020. "How significant is corporate social responsibility to business research?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1809-1817, July.
    14. Jared Peifer, 2014. "Fund Loyalty Among Socially Responsible Investors: The Importance of the Economic and Ethical Domains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(4), pages 635-649, June.
    15. Nir Halevy & Sora Jun & Eileen Y. Chou, 2020. "Intergroup Conflict is Our Business: CEOs’ Ethical Intergroup Leadership Fuels Stakeholder Support for Corporate Intergroup Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 229-246, February.
    16. Monica Thiel, 2010. "Innovations in Corporate Social Responsibility from Global Business Leaders at Panasonic, Thomson Reuters and Nanyang Business School," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 2(2), pages 194-200, September.
    17. Ruth Alas & Külliki Tafel, 2008. "Conceptualizing the Dynamics of Social Responsibility: Evidence from a Case Study of Estonia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 371-385, August.
    18. Siying Cai & Wenzhong Zhu & Yuting Wang, 2023. "Corpus analysis of evaluative language and framework implementation for pharmaceutical industry CSR reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 2037-2052, July.
    19. Cameron Sabadoz, 2011. "Between Profit-Seeking and Prosociality: Corporate Social Responsibility as Derridean Supplement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 77-91, November.
    20. Marcin Zemigala, 2020. "Spoleczna odpowiedzialnosc biznesu i spoleczna odpowiedzialnosc nauki – w poszukiwaniu analogii," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(32), pages 108-120.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:4:y:2012:i:7:p:379-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.