IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Immigration, langues et performance économique : le Québec et l’Ontario entre 1970 et 1995

Listed author(s):
  • Grenier, Gilles

    (Département de science économique, Université d’Ottawa)

This study contributes to two relatively distinct streams of literature: the economic integration of immigrants and the links between language attributes and earnings in Canada. The analysis is done with two Canadian provinces, Québec and Ontario, and uses micro-data from the five Canadian censuses of 1971, 1981, 1986, 1991 and 1996. The sample is divided between the non-immigrants and the immigrants (and among the latter between those originating from Europe and the United States and those originating from the rest of the world) and between the individuals speaking French, English or another language at home. In a first stage of the analysis, comparisons of mean wages and salaries are done in relation to immigration and language attributes. It is observed that the relative wages of immigrants have decreased over time. Francophones have improved their economic position, both among immigrants and non-immigrants, but without catching up completely with Anglophones. People who speak at home another language than French or English have in general relatively low incomes. In a second stage of the analysis, earnings regressions are estimated to see the net effects of immigration and language attributes. Earnings gaps between Anglophones and Francophones are lower when only net effects are considered, and in Ontario they are even null or in favour of Francophones. An interesting question concerns the economic performance of immigrants in Québec in relation to their language choices. The results show that immigrants who speak French do as well as those who speak English. In spite of that, not enough immigrants assimilate to the Francophone community to maintain the demographic weight of the French language. The author suggests that the Canadian immigration policy take into account the linguistic balance between French and English. Cette étude contribue à deux courants de littérature relativement distincts : l’intégration économique des immigrants et les liens entre les attributs linguistiques et les revenus au Canada. L’analyse porte sur deux provinces canadiennes, le Québec et l’Ontario, et utilise les microdonnées des cinq recensements canadiens de 1971, 1981, 1986, 1991 et 1996. L’échantillon est divisé entre les non-immigrants et les immigrants (et parmi ces derniers entre ceux originaires de l’Europe et des États-Unis et ceux originaires du reste du monde) et entre les personnes parlant le français, l’anglais ou une autre langue à la maison. Dans un premier temps, on fait des comparaisons de traitements et salaires moyens en fonction des attributs de langue et d’immigration. On constate que les revenus relatifs des immigrants ont diminué dans le temps. Par ailleurs, les francophones ont amélioré leur situation économique, à la fois chez les immigrants et les non-immigrants, mais sans rattraper totalement les anglophones. Les personnes parlant des langues autres que l’anglais ou le français ont en général des revenus assez faibles. Dans un deuxième temps, on estime des régressions de gains pour voir les effets nets des attributs d’immigration et de langue. Les écarts entre francophones et anglophones sont plus faibles quand on ne considère que les effets nets, et en Ontario, ils sont même nuls ou en faveur des francophones. Une question intéressante concerne la performance économique des immigrants au Québec en fonction de leurs choix linguistiques. Les résultats montrent que les immigrants qui parlent français s’intègrent aussi bien que ceux qui parlent anglais. Malgré cela, il n’y a pas suffisamment d’immigrants qui s’intègrent à la communauté francophone pour assurer le maintien du poids démographique du français. L’auteur suggère que la politique canadienne d’immigration tienne compte de l’équilibre linguistique entre le français et l’anglais.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Société Canadienne de Science Economique in its journal L'Actualité économique.

Volume (Year): 77 (2001)
Issue (Month): 3 (septembre)
Pages: 305-338

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:77:y:2001:i:3:p:305-338
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Alan G. Green & David A. Green, 1999. "The Economic Goals of Canada's Immigration Policy, Past and Present," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 25(4), pages 425-451, December.
  2. David E. Bloom & Gilles Grenier & Morley Gunderson, 1995. "The Changing Labour Market Position of Canadian Immigrants," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 28(4b), pages 987-1005, November.
  3. Duleep, Harriet & Regets, Mark, 2002. "The Elusive Concept of Immigrant Quality: Evidence from 1970-1990," IZA Discussion Papers 631, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  4. Chiswick, Barry R, 1978. "The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-born Men," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 86(5), pages 897-921, October.
  5. Baker, Michael & Benjamin, Dwayne, 1994. "The Performance of Immigrants in the Canadian Labor Market," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(3), pages 369-405, July.
  6. Wright, Robert E & Maxim, Paul S, 1993. "Immigration Policy and Immigrant Quality: Empirical Evidence from Canada," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 6(4), pages 337-352, November.
  7. Mary L. Grant, 1999. "Evidence of New Immigrant Assimilation in Canada," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 32(4), pages 930-955, August.
  8. Chiswick, Barry R & Miller, Paul W, 1994. "Language Choice among Immigrants in a Multi-lingual Destination," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 119-131.
  9. Grenier, G, 1996. "Linguistic and Economic Characteristics of Francophone Minorities in Canada: A Comparison of Ontario and New Brunswick," Working Papers 96010e, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:77:y:2001:i:3:p:305-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bruce Shearer)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.