La théorie post-keynésienne et la recherche empirique
The paper argues that post-Keynesian theory has reached a third stage in its development, that of empirically validating its arguments. The failure of the alternative neoclassical paradigm to meet any of the necessary empirical tests — the correspondence, comprehensiveness, parsimony and praxis tests in particular — is first pointed out. The methodological pitfalls which post-Keynesian theory must guard against if it is to avoid the same result are then indicated. From this line of argument emerges the imminent research agenda if post-Keynesian theory is eventually to place economics on a scientific basis by developing a body of theory which can be both empirically validated and conducive to further empirical research.
Volume (Year): 58 (1982)
Issue (Month): 1 (janvier-juin)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.scse.ca/|
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Leonard Forman & Alfred S. Eichner, 1981. "A Post Keynesian Short-Period Model: Some Preliminary Econometric Results," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 4(1), pages 117-135, October.
- Basil J. Moore, 1979. "The Endogenous Money Stock," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 2(1), pages 49-70, October.
- Hyman P. Minsky, 1992. "The Financial Instability Hypothesis," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_74, Levy Economics Institute.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:58:y:1982:i:1:p:223-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bruce Shearer)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.