IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Manager’s decision-making in organizations empirical analysis of bureaucratic vs. learning approach

Listed author(s):
  • Eva Bolfikova


    (University of Pavol Jozef Safarik in Kosice, Faculty of Public Administration, Kosice, Slovak Republic)

  • Daniela Hrehova

    (Technical University in Kosice, Department of Social Sciences, Kosice, Slovak Republic)

  • Jana Frenova

    (The University of Presov, Faculty of Management, Presov, Slovak Republic)

Registered author(s):

    The paper is focused on the study of manager’s decision-making with respect to the basic model of learning organization, presented by P. Senge as a system model of management. On one hand, the empirical research was conducted in connection with key dimensions of organizational learning such as: 1. system thinking, 2. personal mastery, 3. mental models, 4. team learning, 5. building shared vision and 6. dynamics causes. On the other hand, the research was connected with the analysis of the bureaucratic logic of decision-making process, characterized by non-functional stability, inflexibility, individualism, power, authority and hierarchy, centralization, vagueness, fragmentariness. The objective of the research was to analyse to what extent manager’s decisionmaking is based on bureaucratic tools or organizational learning in either complex problem-solving or non-problem- solving decision-making. (MANOVA, method of the repeated measure, inter- subject factor situation: 1. non-problematic, 2. problematic). The conclusion of analysis is that there are significant differences in character of solving of problem situation and non-problem situation decision-making: the bureaucratic attributes of decision-making are more intensive in problematic situations while learning approach is more actual in non-problematic situations. The results of our analysis have shown that managers who apply the learning organization attributes in their decision-making. are more successful in problem-solving.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics in its journal Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics.

    Volume (Year): 28 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 135-163

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rfe:zbefri:v:28:y:2010:i:1:p:135-163
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    p.p. 113, 51000 RIJEKA, Ivana Filipovica 4

    Phone: 0038551355111
    Fax: 0038551212268
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Marko Pahor & Miha Škerlavaj & Vlado Dimovski, 2007. "The Network Perspective To Organizational Learning — A Comparison Of Two Companies," World Scientific Book Chapters,in: Knowledge Management Innovation, Technology and Cultures, chapter 6, pages 65-79 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Barr, Jason & Saraceno, Francesco, 2009. "Organization, learning and cooperation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(1-2), pages 39-53, May.
    3. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/9832 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfe:zbefri:v:28:y:2010:i:1:p:135-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Antica Sergovic)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.