IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/ijecsj/v7y2024i1p15-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Distrust Regulation and Trustworthiness Demonstration on Trust Repair in Responding to Online Negative Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayang Zhang
  • Xin Huang

Abstract

This paper explores how trust can be repaired after receiving online negative reviews. In this study, trust repair strategies are classified into six categories, and their effects on benevolence, ability, and integrity are examined. A predominant reliance is discerned on trustworthiness demonstration for affective repair strategies within online negative review responses, showcasing a noteworthy efficacy in reinstating trust across the dimensions of benevolence, integrity, and ability. Through a systematic analysis of these strategies, this paper not only uncovers the intricate interplay between responses and their consequential impacts on three dimensions of trust but also provides valuable comprehension of the multifaceted dynamics inherent in trust repair. By offering a refined understanding of the strategies involved in repairing trust, this research contributes actionable insights with theoretical insights into trust repair in digital business communication and practical implications for individuals and organizations grappling with the intricacies of navigating challenging online negative reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayang Zhang & Xin Huang, 2024. "The Effect of Distrust Regulation and Trustworthiness Demonstration on Trust Repair in Responding to Online Negative Reviews," International Journal of English and Cultural Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 15-30, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:ijecsj:v:7:y:2024:i:1:p:15-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijecs/article/download/6758/6469
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijecs/article/view/6758
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Argyris, Young Anna & Monu, Kafui & Kim, Yongsuk & Zhou, Yilu & Wang, Zuhui & Yin, Zhaozheng, 2021. "Using Speech Acts to Elicit Positive Emotions for Complainants on Social Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 67-80.
    2. Grégoire, Yany & Salle, Audrey & Tripp, Thomas M., 2015. "Managing social media crises with your customers: The good, the bad, and the ugly," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 173-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiong, Feng & Chapple, Larelle & Yin, Haiying, 2018. "The use of social media to detect corporate fraud: A case study approach," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 623-633.
    2. Patel, Pankaj C. & Pearce, John A. & Bachrach, Daniel G., 2018. "Psychological Distress is increasing among customer-facing retail employees: Evidence from 1997 to 2015," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 21-26.
    3. Dewi Anggraeni & Serena Ghean Niagara & Mohammad Anwar, 2018. "Legal Protection Againts Buyers due to not Performing Seller in Electronic Transaction," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 168-171.
    4. Liebrecht, Christine & Tsaousi, Christina & van Hooijdonk, Charlotte, 2021. "Linguistic elements of conversational human voice in online brand communication: Manipulations and perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 124-135.
    5. Gerrath, Maximilian H.E.E. & Mafael, Alexander & Ulqinaku, Aulona & Biraglia, Alessandro, 2023. "Service failures in times of crisis: An analysis of eWOM emotionality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Steven Chen, 2023. "A counterinsurgent (COIN) framework to defend against consumer activists," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(4), pages 275-301, July.
    7. Istanbulluoglu, Doga & Sakman, Ezgi, 2024. "Successful complaint handling on social media predicts increased repurchase intention: The roles of trust in company and propensity to trust," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 11-22.
    8. Weitzl, Wolfgang J. & Einwiller, Sabine A., 2020. "Profiling (un-)committed online complainants: Their characteristics and post-webcare reactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 740-753.
    9. Wang, Fei & Xu, Haifeng & Hou, Ronglin & Zhu, Zhen, 2023. "Designing marketing content for social commerce to drive consumer purchase behaviors: A perspective from speech act theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Vermeer, Susan A.M. & Araujo, Theo & Bernritter, Stefan F. & van Noort, Guda, 2019. "Seeing the wood for the trees: How machine learning can help firms in identifying relevant electronic word-of-mouth in social media," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 492-508.
    11. Bacile, Todd J. & Wolter, Jeremy S. & Allen, Alexis M. & Xu, Pei, 2018. "The Effects of Online Incivility and Consumer-to-Consumer Interactional Justice on Complainants, Observers, and Service Providers During Social Media Service Recovery," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 60-81.
    12. Gabriela Almeida Marcon Nora & Anete Alberton & Diego Hernando Florez Ayala, 2023. "Stakeholder theory and actor‐network theory: The stakeholder engagement in energy transitions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 673-685, January.
    13. Yuan, Denghua & Lin, Zhibin & Filieri, Raffaele & Liu, Ran & Zheng, Mengqin, 2020. "Managing the product-harm crisis in the digital era: The role of consumer online brand community engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 38-47.
    14. Huang, Ran & Ha, Sejin, 2020. "The effects of warmth-oriented and competence-oriented service recovery messages on observers on online platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 616-627.
    15. de Campos Ribeiro, Gisèle & Butori, Raphaëlle & Le Nagard, Emmanuelle, 2018. "The determinants of approval of online consumer revenge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 212-221.
    16. M. S. Balaji & Subhash Jha & Marla B. Royne, 2015. "Customer e-complaining behaviours using social media," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(11-12), pages 633-654, August.
    17. Yang Gao & Wenjing Duan & Huaxia Rui, 2022. "Does Social Media Accelerate Product Recalls? Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 954-977, September.
    18. Hill Cummings, Krista & Seitchik, Allison E., 2020. "The differential treatment of women during service recovery: How perceived social power affects consumers’ postfailure compensation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(5), pages 647-658.
    19. Yany Grégoire & Renaud Legoux & Thomas M. Tripp & Marie-Louise Radanielina-Hita & Jeffrey Joireman & Jeffrey D. Rotman, 2019. "What Do Online Complainers Want? An Examination of the Justice Motivations and the Moral Implications of Vigilante and Reparation Schemas," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 167-188, November.
    20. Thomas O. Uitz & Eva Jancikova, 2021. "Service Failures and How the Perception of Justice Affects the Level of Satisfaction," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 105-117.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:ijecsj:v:7:y:2024:i:1:p:15-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.