IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v10y2021i8p284-297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextual and multifactorial influence on perception of safety from crime among selected Malaysians

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Samad Abdul Ghani

    (Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

  • Haris Abdul Wahab

    (Department of Social Administration and Justice, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)

  • Amer Saifude Ghazali

    (Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)

  • Siti Balqis Mohd Azam

    (Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

Abstract

Despite official crime figures showing a continuous decline in the rate of crime, the perception of the high level of crime by many Malaysians suggests other factors are affecting their perception of safety from crime. The objective of this study is to identify and understand these factors through a qualitative study that employs online focus group discussions. This study argues that the perception of safety from crime is the result of interactions of a number of factors such as the experience of victimisation, crime information, neighbourhood conditions as well as the perception of law enforcement and government crime reduction policy. The sense of safety from crime is also contextual as it may fluctuate according to time, place, activities and situations. Analysis of the data from the focus group discussions found that participants generally have a high perception of safety from crime. However, participants felt less safe when they were in public places and when interacting with online services. In most circumstances, participants' sense of safety is affected by the pressure to be vigilant and to avoid criminal victimisation. This pressure is exacerbated by low-quality information on crime that is often received through social media. Crime information on social media has a significant impact on participants’ perceptions of crime. The overall analysis of the findings suggests that the most important factor which affects the perception of safety from crime among these selected Malaysians is their sense of safety in their homes and their neighbourhood. Hence, efforts to increase the sense of safety among Malaysians should focus on this context. Key Words:Perception of safety from crime, Online focus group, Crime Prevention, Community policing, Malaysia

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Samad Abdul Ghani & Haris Abdul Wahab & Amer Saifude Ghazali & Siti Balqis Mohd Azam, 2021. "Contextual and multifactorial influence on perception of safety from crime among selected Malaysians," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(8), pages 284-297, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:284-297
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i8.1514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1514/1109
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i8.1514
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i8.1514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bossler, Adam M. & Holt, Thomas J., 2010. "The effect of self-control on victimization in the cyberworld," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 227-236, May.
    2. Hille, Patrick & Walsh, Gianfranco & Cleveland, Mark, 2015. "Consumer Fear of Online Identity Theft: Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-19.
    3. Forsythe, Sandra M. & Shi, Bo, 2003. "Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 867-875, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jordan Gašper & Leskovar Robert & Marič Miha, 2018. "Impact of Fear of Identity Theft and Perceived Risk on Online Purchase Intention," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 51(2), pages 146-155, May.
    2. Claudia BOBALCA, 2015. "The Loyal Customers’ Perception Regarding The Online Buying Process," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7(2), pages 241-255, August.
    3. Kim, Jeeyeon & Kim, Mingyung & Choi, Jeonghye & Trivedi, Minakshi, 2019. "Offline social interactions and online shopping demand: Does the degree of social interactions matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 373-381.
    4. Christophe Bezes, 2011. "Types de risques perçus et réducteurs de risques dans le commerce électronique : le cas du site Fnac.com," Post-Print hal-02086726, HAL.
    5. repec:dgr:rugsom:04f04 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Wei-Lun Chang & Li-Ming Chen & Takako Hashimoto, 2022. "Cashless Japan: Unlocking Influential Risk on Mobile Payment Service," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1515-1528, October.
    7. Nicoleta-Dorina RACOLŢA-PAINA & Theodora Alexandra LUCA, 2011. "Nowadays Online Consumers' Rights And Interests. Case Study- The Romanian Educated Online Young Consumer," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 6(2), Summer.
    8. Li, Chen & Swaminathan, Srinivasan & Kim, Junhee, 2021. "The role of marketing channels in consumers’ promotional point redemption decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 314-323.
    9. Basnet, Hem C. & Donou-Adonsou, Ficawoyi, 2016. "Internet, consumer spending, and credit card balance: Evidence from US consumers," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 11-22.
    10. Anam Bhatti & Shahrin Saad & Salimon Maruf Gbadebo, 2019. "Effect of Financial Risk, Privacy Risk and Product Risk on Online Shopping Behavior," Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 7(4), pages :343-356, December.
    11. Hem C. Basnet & Ficawoyi Donou‐Adonsou, 2016. "Internet, consumer spending, and credit card balance: Evidence from US consumers," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 11-22, September.
    12. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    13. Patricea Elena BERTEA, 2015. "From Fearful To Trustful – How Perceived Risk Dimensions In E-Commerce Differentiate Between Consumers," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 15, pages 45-54, June.
    14. Gensler, Sonja & Leeflang, Peter & Skiera, Bernd, 2012. "Impact of online channel use on customer revenues and costs to serve: Considering product portfolios and self-selection," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 192-201.
    15. Alrawad, Mahmaod & Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alyatama, Sundus & Al Khattab, Adel & Alsoboa, Sliman S. & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Ramadan, Mujtaba Hashim & Arafa, Hussin Mostafa & Ahmed, Nazar Ali & Alsyouf, , 2023. "Assessing customers perception of online shopping risks: A structural equation modeling–based multigroup analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Minjeong Kang & Taeshik Gong, 2019. "Dysfunctional customer behavior: conceptualization and empirical validation," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(4), pages 625-646, December.
    17. Augustine Yao Dzathor, 2013. "Do Business Demographics Matter to Nascent Venture Performance? A Longitudinal Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(8), pages 44-56, August.
    18. Zhiyuan Yu & Doudou Jin, 2021. "Determinants of Users’ Attitude and Intention to Intelligent Connected Vehicle Infotainment in the 5G-V2X Mobile Ecosystem," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Silvina Santana & Sandra Loureiro, 2010. "Assessing Benefits And Risks Of Online Shopping In Spain And Scotland," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(2), pages 161-172.
    20. Byung H. Lee, 2018. "Explaining Cyber Deviance among School-Aged Youth," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(2), pages 563-584, April.
    21. Sara Jonsson & Inga-Lill Söderberg, 2018. "Investigating explanatory theories on laypeople’s risk perception of personal economic collapse in a bank crisis – the Cyprus case," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 763-779, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:284-297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.