IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Best Strategies For The Ideal Business Model


  • Dimitrios VALSAMIDIS

    (TEI of East Macedonia and Thrace, Kavala, Greece)

  • Dimosthenis PAPPAS

    (TEI of East Macedonia and Thrace, Kavala, Greece)

  • Vasilios FERELIS

    (TEI of East Macedonia and Thrace, Kavala, Greece)

  • Michael NIKOLAIDIS

    (TEI of East Macedonia and Thrace, Kavala, Greece)


In different chronological periods, four innovative web based business models proved that the human creativity can lead to huge success even with few resources in the beginning. All the examples have something common, the rapid implementation of an instant inspiration. The so called big four (Facebook, Amazon, Google, Apple) or FAGA or GAFA have explosive success in a certain period of time. The last decade, Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google are the four most influential companies on the planet. These companies excel via their superior use of technology, have built incredible ecosystems and have embraced partnerships and external innovation. Beyond all of this, the big four have embraced an entirely new way of doing business: (1) They are rooted in equally powerful technologies—and their intelligent usage. In other words, they differ from traditional platforms in that they are not predicated on physical assets, land, and natural resources. (2) They benefit tremendously from vibrant ecosystems (partners, developers, users, customers, and communities). Facebook in social networks, Amazon in electronic commerce, Google in search engines and Apple in the multimedia devices proved that brand and business model work together because if they do not align brand and business model it will backfire, probably not in the short run but surely in the long run. The similarities and the differences of the big four models can assist to draw useful insights about the necessary guidelines for an effective entrepreneurship. Using these examples, we conduct a comparative evaluation using SWOT analysis and business model canvas, and present the results. The best practices of FAGA draw valuable insights for an ideal business model.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitrios VALSAMIDIS & Dimosthenis PAPPAS & Vasilios FERELIS & Michael NIKOLAIDIS, 2018. "Best Strategies For The Ideal Business Model," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 17(1), pages 24-38.
  • Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2018:i:1:p:24-38

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Elias Carayannis & Stavros Sindakis & Christian Walter, 2015. "Business Model Innovation as Lever of Organizational Sustainability," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 85-104, February.
    2. Richard J. Gilbert, 2015. "E-Books: A Tale of Digital Disruption," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 165-184, Summer.
    3. Juha Winter & Sandro Battisti & Thommie Burström & Sakari Luukkainen, 2018. "Exploring the Success Factors of Mobile Business Ecosystems," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Ejis, 2018. "Table of Contents," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
    5. Gerard George & Adam J. Bock, 2011. "The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 83-111, January.
    6. Bouwman, Harry & Carlsson, Christer & Carlsson, Joanna & Nikou, Shahrokh & Sell, Anna & Walden, Pirkko, 2014. "How Nokia failed to nail the Smartphone market," 25th European Regional ITS Conference, Brussels 2014 101414, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Unknown, 1990. "Table of Contents," 1990 Symposium, Agricultural Restructuring in Southern Africa, July 24-27, 1990, Swakopmund, Namibia 183476, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Miguel Gómez-Uranga & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia & Jon Barrutia (ed.), 2016. "Dynamics of Big Internet Industry Groups and Future Trends," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-31147-0, August.
    9. Stavrinoudis, Theodoros, 2007. "Applying SWOT Analysis in Formulation of Propositions for more Effective Operational Application of Timeshare in Greece," MPRA Paper 25370, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 27 Nov 2007.
    10. Ejis, 2018. "Table of Contents," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer, 2019. "Fake News and Propaganda: Trump’s Democratic America and Hitler’s National Socialist (Nazi) Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Sascha Kraus & Alexander Brem & Miriam Schuessler & Felix Schuessler & Thomas Niemand, 2019. "Innovative Born Globals: Investigating the Influence of Their Business Models on International Performance," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Alexander Brem & Joe Tidd & Tugrul Daim (ed.), Managing Innovation Internationalization of Innovation, chapter 11, pages 275-328, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Michelle Giles & Laura Graham & Jean Ball & Jennie King & Wendy Watts & Alison Harris & Christopher Oldmeadow & Rod Ling & Michelle Paul & Anthony O’Brien & Vicki Parker & John Wiggers & Maralyn Foure, 2020. "Implementation of a multifaceted nurse‐led intervention to reduce indwelling urinary catheter use in four Australian hospitals: A pre‐ and postintervention study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 872-886, March.
    4. Marcella Alsan & Sarah Eichmeyer, 2021. "Experimental Evidence on the Effectiveness of Non-Experts for Improving Vaccine Demand," NBER Working Papers 28593, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Grytten, Jostein & Skau, Irene & Sørensen, Rune, 2020. "Who dies early? Education, mortality and causes of death in Norway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Karlsson, Ida & Rootzén, Johan & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains – Analysis of a Swedish road construction project," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Nareen O. M. Salim & Adnan Mohsin Abdulazeez, 2021. "Human Diseases Detection Based On Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(2), pages 102-113.
    8. Nikolaj Kaae Kirk & Clara Navarrete & Jakob Ellegaard Juhl & José Luis Martínez & Alessandra Procentese, 2021. "The “Zero Miles Product” Concept Applied to Biofuel Production: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Michelle Tew & Philip Clarke & Karin Thursky & Kim Dalziel, 2019. "Incorporating Future Medical Costs: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Cancer Patients," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(7), pages 931-941, July.
    10. Alves, Luís & Holz, Laura I.V. & Fernandes, Celina & Ribeirinha, Paulo & Mendes, Diogo & Fagg, Duncan P. & Mendes, Adélio, 2022. "A comprehensive review of NOx and N2O mitigation from industrial streams," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    12. Burcu KAYA ERDEM & Rukiye CİVAN KEMİKSİZ, 2020. "Çevrimiçi Dönüşümün Mesleki Tezahürü: E-Spor Faaliyetleriyle “Dijital Oyuncular Kuşağı”," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(1), pages 1-40, September.
    13. Luiz Oliveira & Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues & Sergei A. Kozlov & Ricardo A. L. Rabêlo & Victor Hugo C. de Albuquerque, 2019. "MAC Layer Protocols for Internet of Things: A Survey," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-42, January.
    14. Ida Karlsson & Johan Rootzén & Alla Toktarova & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson & Lisa Göransson, 2020. "Roadmap for Decarbonization of the Building and Construction Industry—A Supply Chain Analysis Including Primary Production of Steel and Cement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-40, August.
    15. Hirmer, S.A. & George-Williams, H. & Rhys, J. & McNicholl, D. & McCulloch, M., 2021. "Stakeholder decision-making: Understanding Sierra Leone's energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Raphaël Maucuer & Alexandre Renaud, 2019. "Business Model Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Origins and Trends," Post-Print hal-01918188, HAL.
    17. Amarzaya Jadambaa & Nicholas Graves & Donna Cross & Rosana Pacella & Hannah J. Thomas & James G. Scott & Qinglu Cheng & David Brain, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of an Intervention Designed to Reduce Bullying in Australian Schools," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 79-89, January.
    18. Charles Engel & Steve Pak Yeung Wu, 2018. "Liquidity and Exchange Rates: An Empirical Investigation," NBER Working Papers 25397, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Elizabeth Wehler & Natalie Boytsov & Claudia Nicolay & Oscar Herrera-Restrepo & Stacey Kowal, 2020. "A Budget Impact and Cost Per Additional Responder Analysis for Baricitinib for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with an Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 39-56, January.
    20. Muhammad Anwar, 2018. "BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION AND SMEs PERFORMANCE — DOES COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE MEDIATE?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-31, October.

    More about this item


    Business model canvas; SWOT analysis; Digital disruption; Comparative evaluation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2018:i:1:p:24-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alina Hagiu The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Alina Hagiu to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.