IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i5-6p872-886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of a multifaceted nurse‐led intervention to reduce indwelling urinary catheter use in four Australian hospitals: A pre‐ and postintervention study

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle Giles
  • Laura Graham
  • Jean Ball
  • Jennie King
  • Wendy Watts
  • Alison Harris
  • Christopher Oldmeadow
  • Rod Ling
  • Michelle Paul
  • Anthony O’Brien
  • Vicki Parker
  • John Wiggers
  • Maralyn Foureur

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aimed to reduce indwelling urinary catheter (IDC) use and duration through implementation of a multifaceted “bundled” care intervention. Background Indwelling urinary catheters present a risk for patients through the potential development of catheter‐associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), with duration of IDC a key risk factor. Catheter‐associated urinary tract infection is considered preventable yet accounts for over a third of all hospital‐acquired infections. The most effective CAUTI reduction strategy is to avoid IDC use where ever possible and to remove the IDC as early as appropriate. Design A cluster‐controlled pre‐ and poststudy at a facility level with a phased intervention implementation approach. Methods A multifaceted intervention involving a “No CAUTI” catheter care bundle was implemented, in 4 acute‐care hospitals, 2 in metropolitan and 2 in rural locations, in New South Wales, Australia. Indwelling urinary catheter point prevalence and duration data were collected at the bedside on 1,630 adult inpatients at preintervention and 1,677 and 1,551 at 4 and 9 months postintervention. This study is presented in line with the StaRI checklist (see Appendix S1). Results A nonsignificant trend towards reduction in IDC prevalence was identified, from 12% preintervention to 10% of all inpatients at 4 and 9 months. Variability in preintervention IDC prevalence existed across hospitals (8%–16%). Variability in reduction was evident across hospitals at 4 months (between −2% and 4%) and 9 months (between 0%–8%). Hospitals with higher preintervention prevalence showed larger decreases, up to 50% when preintervention prevalence was 16%. Indwelling urinary catheter duration increased as more of the short‐term IDC placements were avoided. Conclusions Implementation of a multifaceted intervention resulted in reduced IDC use in four acute‐care hospitals in Australia. This result was not statistically significant but did reflect a positive trend of reduction. There was a significant reduction in short‐term IDC use at 9 months postintervention. Relevance to clinical practice Clinical nurse leaders can effectively implement change strategies that influence patient outcomes. Implementation of the evidence‐based “No CAUTI” bundle increased awareness of appropriate indications and provided nurses with the tools to inform decision‐making related to insertion and removal of IDCs in acute inpatient settings. Working in partnership with inpatients and the multidisciplinary team is essential in minimising acute‐care IDC use.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle Giles & Laura Graham & Jean Ball & Jennie King & Wendy Watts & Alison Harris & Christopher Oldmeadow & Rod Ling & Michelle Paul & Anthony O’Brien & Vicki Parker & John Wiggers & Maralyn Foure, 2020. "Implementation of a multifaceted nurse‐led intervention to reduce indwelling urinary catheter use in four Australian hospitals: A pre‐ and postintervention study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 872-886, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:5-6:p:872-886
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15142
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ejis, 2018. "Table of Contents," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
    2. Ejis, 2016. "Table of Contents," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    3. Ejis, 2016. "Table of Contents," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
    4. Ejis, 2018. "Table of Contents," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    5. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 2018. "Table of Contents," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 49(2), July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nareen O. M. Salim & Adnan Mohsin Abdulazeez, 2021. "Human Diseases Detection Based On Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(2), pages 102-113.
    2. Luiz Oliveira & Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues & Sergei A. Kozlov & Ricardo A. L. Rabêlo & Victor Hugo C. de Albuquerque, 2019. "MAC Layer Protocols for Internet of Things: A Survey," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-42, January.
    3. Marcella Alsan & Sarah Eichmeyer, 2024. "Experimental Evidence on the Effectiveness of Nonexperts for Improving Vaccine Demand," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 394-414, February.
    4. Karlsson, Ida & Rootzén, Johan & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains – Analysis of a Swedish road construction project," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Nikolaj Kaae Kirk & Clara Navarrete & Jakob Ellegaard Juhl & José Luis Martínez & Alessandra Procentese, 2021. "The “Zero Miles Product” Concept Applied to Biofuel Production: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Michelle Tew & Philip Clarke & Karin Thursky & Kim Dalziel, 2019. "Incorporating Future Medical Costs: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Cancer Patients," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(7), pages 931-941, July.
    7. Alves, Luís & Holz, Laura I.V. & Fernandes, Celina & Ribeirinha, Paulo & Mendes, Diogo & Fagg, Duncan P. & Mendes, Adélio, 2022. "A comprehensive review of NOx and N2O mitigation from industrial streams," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Ida Karlsson & Johan Rootzén & Alla Toktarova & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson & Lisa Göransson, 2020. "Roadmap for Decarbonization of the Building and Construction Industry—A Supply Chain Analysis Including Primary Production of Steel and Cement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-40, August.
    9. Charles Engel & Steve Pak Yeung Wu, 2023. "Liquidity and Exchange Rates: An Empirical Investigation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(5), pages 2395-2438.
    10. Hirmer, S.A. & George-Williams, H. & Rhys, J. & McNicholl, D. & McCulloch, M., 2021. "Stakeholder decision-making: Understanding Sierra Leone's energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Amarzaya Jadambaa & Nicholas Graves & Donna Cross & Rosana Pacella & Hannah J. Thomas & James G. Scott & Qinglu Cheng & David Brain, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of an Intervention Designed to Reduce Bullying in Australian Schools," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 79-89, January.
    12. Dieu Linh Hoang & Chris Davis & Henri C. Moll & Sanderine Nonhebel, 2020. "Can Multiple Uses of Biomass Limit the Feedstock Availability for Future Biogas Production? An Overview of Biogas Feedstocks and Their Alternative Uses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Michelle Giles & Laura Graham & Jean Ball & Wendy Watts & Jennie King & Kamana Bantawa & Michelle Paul & Alison Harris & Anthony Paul O'Brien & Vicki Parker, 2019. "Variations in indwelling urinary catheter use in four Australian acute care hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4572-4581, December.
    14. Robert E. Till & Mary Beth Yount, 2019. "Governance and Incentives: Is It Really All about the Money?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 605-618, October.
    15. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer, 2019. "Fake News and Propaganda: Trump’s Democratic America and Hitler’s National Socialist (Nazi) Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Grytten, Jostein & Skau, Irene & Sørensen, Rune, 2020. "Who dies early? Education, mortality and causes of death in Norway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    17. Dimitrios VALSAMIDIS & Dimosthenis PAPPAS & Vasilios FERELIS & Michael NIKOLAIDIS, 2018. "Best Strategies For The Ideal Business Model," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 17(1), pages 24-38.
    18. Phuong T. Nguyen & Sam Wells, 2018. "Systemic Indicators for Rural Communities in Developing Economies: Bringing the Shared Vision into Being," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 159-177, April.
    19. Ivana Borić & Andrea Ćosić & Iva Prskalo, 2021. "Experiences of Adolescent Participation in Educational Institutions in Croatia," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Héctor Santaella Quintero (Editor), 2022. "Balance, reforma y perspectivas del Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo (Ley 1437 de 2011) en su décimo aniversario," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1335, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:5-6:p:872-886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.