IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rvofce/ofce_0751-6614_1992_num_42_1_1290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Éléments pour une nouvelle politique agricole

Author

Listed:
  • Jacques Le Cacheux
  • Henri Mendras

Abstract

[eng] Elements of a new Agricultural Policy . Jacques Le Cacheux et Henri Mendras. The European common agricultural policy (CAP) had initially been conceived as a device to ensure the expansion of agricultural production thanks to the modernization of techniques and the intensification of agriculture. It had however tended to degenerate into a system of management of agricultural decline. From the point of view of the European objective of self-sufficiency and in terms of export performance, especially for France, this policy may be said to have been a success, as may be ascertained by the various economic indicators availabe. But in spite of direct subsidies and an increasingly costly price support mechanism for basic foodstuffs, the French agricultural population has continued to shrink at an annual rate of 2 to 3 % ; average incomes have been more or less maintained, but only thanks to the declining number of farmers ; and disequilibria have persisted, insofar as this tendency has not led to the disappearance of excess supplies, notably for milk and cereals. Hence, up until the recent reform, the CAP was essentially feeding the disequilibria that have been killing the profession. . The new CAP only attempts to remedy the persistant tendency to excess supply by curbing the incentives to produce. It is therefore perceived by farmers as a device meant to accelerate their disappearance or, through direct income support, to « preserve the species », in the same way as has been done elsewhere for native Americans or even threatened animal species. . How to design a genuine agricultural policy that would be viable in the long run remains an open issue : although it offers a number of promising directions, the present paper is no more than an invitation to reflect on such an alternative policy. [fre] Conçue pour assurer une expansion des productions agricoles par la modernisation des exploitations et l'intensification, l'ancienne Politique agricole commune (PAC) européenne, dont la réforme suscite aujourd'hui l'inquiétude des agriculteurs, avait dégénéré en un système de gestion du déclin agricole. Malgré les subventions directes et un soutien de plus en plus coûteux des cours, la population agricole a continué de décliner à un rythme soutenu (entre - 2 % et - 3 % par an) ; le revenu moyen ne s'est maintenu que par ce déclin ; de plus les déséquilibres demeurent, puisque les départs n'entraînent pas la résorption des excédents de produits de base, notamment le lait et les céréales. L'ancienne PAC servait donc principalement à nourrir les déséquilibres dont meurent les agriculteurs. . La nouvelle PAC tente de remédier à la surproduction agricole en limitant les incitations à la production. De ce fait, elle donne aux agriculteurs le sentiment qu'il s'agit simplement d'organiser leur lente disparition ou, par les aides directes, de « préserver l'espèce », comme on le fait des Indiens dans leur réserve ou des animaux en voie de disparition. . La question d'une politique agricole réellement viable à long terme reste en fait ouverte : c'est à la réflexion sur cette autre politique agricole qu'invite cet article, en indiquant quelques pistes pour une véritable ambition agricole.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacques Le Cacheux & Henri Mendras, 1992. "Éléments pour une nouvelle politique agricole," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 42(1), pages 95-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1992_num_42_1_1290
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ofce.1992.1290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ofce.1992.1290
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ofce_0751-6614_1992_num_42_1_1290
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henri Mendras, 1983. "Plaidoyer pour une politique de développement rural," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 4(1), pages 123-144.
    2. Ulrich Koester & Stephan Cramon-Taubadel, 1992. "EC Agricultural reform ad infinitum?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;German National Library of Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 27(4), pages 151-156, July.
    3. Gordon C. Rausser, 1992. "Predatory versus Productive Government: The Case of U.S. Agricultural Policies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 133-157, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacky Fayolle & Jacques Le Cacheux, 1998. "Élargissement, PAC, politiques structurelles et « juste retour » : la quadrature du cercle budgétaire européen," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 66(1), pages 37-60.
    2. Jacques Le Cacheux, 2012. "Agriculture mondiale et européenne : défis du XXI e siècle," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(1), pages 195-234.
    3. Jacques Le Cacheux, 2007. "Le nerf de la guerre (économique) : Les faiblesses du budget européen," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 89(3), pages 71-87.
    4. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/2095 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09hi4j38dhl is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1992_num_42_1_1290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ofce .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.