IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Rationalité, monnaie et activité

Listed author(s):
  • Herschel I. Grossman

[eng] This article discusses recent analyses of the real effects of monetary aggregates. Monetarists, at first, then proponents of the New Classical Economics, in a more extreme fashion, have contended that systematic monetary policies have no influence on production or employment. However empirical studies do not support this proposition : A relation between money and activity is indeed observed. Real business cycle theories cannot convincingly account for such a relation, which is closer to what Keynesian theory predicts. But this theory implies that agents do not exhaust perceived gains from trade. How then can economic rationality be reconciled with monetary disequilibrium ? The paper offers a review of the various attempts to give this approach orthodox foundations. Its conclusion is that near- rationality seems, for now, to be the most useful « as-if » assumption in explaining macro-economic fluctuations. [fre] Cet article fait le point sur les travaux récents portant sur les effets réels de la variation des agrégats monétaires. Le monétarisme d'abord, puis sous une forme plus radicale la nouvelle école classique, concluent qu'une politique monétaire systématique ne peut influencer la production ou l'emploi. Les travaux empiriques ne confirment pas cette conclusion, car il existe de fait une relation entre monnaie et activité. Les théories du cycle réel de l'activité ne fournissent pas une explication convaincante de cette relation, qui est davantage conforme aux prédictions de la théorie keynésienne. Mais cette dernière implique l'existence de gains potentiels de l'échange qui ne seraient pas mis à profit par les agents économiques. Comment alors concilier la rationalité économique et le déséquilibre monétaire ? L'article passe en revue les différentes théories de cette conciliation, pour conclure que le concept de quasi-rationalité fournit pour l'instant l'hypothèse provisoire la plus utile pour l'explication des fluctuations macroéconomiques.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Observations et diagnostics économiques : revue de l'OFCE.

Volume (Year): 15 (1986)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 207-216

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1986_num_15_1_1057
Note: DOI:10.3406/ofce.1986.1057
Contact details of provider: Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. George A. Akerlof & Janet L. Yellen, 1985. "A Near-Rational Model of the Business Cycle, with Wage and Price Inertia," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 100(Supplemen), pages 823-838.
  2. King, Robert G., 1981. "Monetary information and monetary neutrality," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 195-206.
  3. Boschen, John F. & Grossman, Herschel I., 1982. "Tests of equilibrium macroeconomics using contemporaneous monetary data," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 309-333.
  4. Schultze, Charles L, 1985. "Microeconomic Efficiency and Nominal Wage Stickiness," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 1-15, March.
  5. King, Robert G & Plosser, Charles I, 1984. "Money, Credit, and Prices in a Real Business Cycle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(3), pages 363-380, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1986_num_15_1_1057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.