IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1998_num_311_1_2609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La production domestique des femmes réduit l'inégalité des revenus familiaux

Author

Listed:
  • France Caillavet

Abstract

[ger] Die Eigenproduktion der Frauen mindert die Ungleichheit der Familieneinkommen . Eine methodologische Studie anhand franzosischer und spanischer Daten . Beim Gesamteinkommen im Sinne von Becker wird zum Arbeitseinkommen der geschâtzte Wert der Eigenproduktion der Privathaushalte hinzugerechnet. Unabhàngig vom benutzten Schâtzverfahren weist die Verteilung des Gesamteinkommens eine viel geringere Ungleichheit als die des Arbeitseinkommens auf. Wenngleich es auch schwierig ist, die kontextbedingten Unterschiede von den methodologischen Unterschieden abzugrenzen, so kônnen dennoch anhand der âhnlichen Tendenzen, die sich bei den franzôsischen und spanischen Daten feststellen lassen, mehrere Ergebnisse aufgezeigt werden, die mit den herkômmlichen Einkommensuntersuchungen nicht ûbereinstimmen. Die grôBte Ungleichheit bei den Arbeitseinkommen ist bei den Haushalten anzutreffen, in denen die Frau nicht erwerbstàtig ist, wàhrend man bei Einbeziehung derEigenproduktion zum umgekehrten Ergebnis gelangt. In Spanien kommt dem "ausgleichenden" Effekt, der in dieser Untersuchung einzig und allein der Eigenproduktion der Ehefrau zugeschrieben wird, eine besonders groBe Bedeutung zu; denn das Gesamteinkommen der Haushalte, bei denen die Frau nicht erwerbstàtig ist, liegt ûber demjenigen der Haushalte, bei denen die Frau einer Erwerbstâtigkeit nachgeht. Die Haushalte mit dem relativ niedrigsten Gesamteinkommen sind diejenigen, bei denen die Frau erwerbstàtig ist und die Kinder im Vorschulalter umfassen. . Bei den Einkommen in Frankreich wird durch die Berûcksichtigung der Eigenproduktion die Ungleichheit zwischen Haushalten mit erwerbstâtiger Frau und Haushalten mit nicht erwerbstâtiger Frau nahezu ausgeglichen. [fre] La production domestique des femmes réduit l'inégalité des revenus familiaux . Une étude méthodologique sur des données françaises et espagnoles . Le « revenu total », au sens de Becker, ajoute au revenu marchand l'estimation de la valeur de la production domestique. La distribution du revenu total est beaucoup moins in- égalitaire que celle du seul revenu marchand, quelle que soit la méthode d'évaluation considérée. Même s'il est difficile de faire la part des différences provenant du contexte de celles dues à la méthodologie, les tendances similaires sur les données françaises et espagnoles permettent de dégager plusieurs résultats non conformes aux études traditionnelles de revenus. La plus forte inégalité de revenus marchands se trouve parmi les ménages où la femme est inactive alors que l'inclusion de la production domestique aboutit au résultat inverse. En Espagne, l'importance de l'effet « égalisateur » dû, dans cette étude, à la seule production domestique de l'épouse est particulièrement accusé : le revenu total des ménages comportant une épouse inactive est supérieur à celui de ménages où l'épouse est active. Les ménages pour lesquels le revenu total est le plus inégal sont ceux où la femme est active et comportant des enfants d'âge préscolaire. Sur les revenus français, la prise en compte de la production domestique élimine quasiment l'inégalité entre ménages avec femme active et ménages avec femme inactive. [eng] Home Production by Women Reduces Inequality in Family Incomes . A Methodological Study Using French and Spanish Data . Becker's definition of total income includes an estimate of the value of home production in addition to market income. The resulting total income distribution is much less unequal than the distribution based solely on market income, regardless of the evaluation method used. Although it is difficult to distinguish the context-generated differences from those due to methodology, similar trends observed across the French and Spanish data produce a number of findings which not comply with conventional income studies. The greatest inequality in market incomes is found among households where the woman is not in the labour force. The inclusion of home production, however, produces the opposite finding. . In Spain, the "equalising" effect due, in this study, solely to the spouse's home production is particularly pronounced: the total income of households where the wife is not in the labour force is higher than that of households with a working wife. The households for which total income is found to be the most unequal are those with a working wife and pre-school children. . The inclusion of home production in French incomes virtually eliminates the inequality between households with a working woman and households where the wife is not in the labour force. [spa] La producciôn doméstica de las mujeres reduce la desigualdad de las rentas familiares . Un estudio metodolôgico sobre datos franceses y espanoles . La renta total, en el sentido de Becker, anade a los ingresos la estimaciôn del valor de la producciôn doméstica. La distribuciôn de la renta total es mucho menos desigual que la de los meros ingresos, sea el que sea el método de evaluaciôn empleado. . Aunque resuite diffcil distinguir aquellas diferencias que provienen del contexto de las que se deben a la metodologfa, las tendencias parecidas sobre datos franceses y espanoles permiten destacar varios resultados que contrastan con los estudios tradicionales de rentas. Se da la mayor desigualdad de ingresos entre los hogares en los que la mujer es inactiva, si bien el incluir la producciôn doméstica desemboca en el resultado inversa. En Espana, la importancia del efecto "igualador" debido, en este estudio, a la sola producciôn doméstica de la esposa es especialmente marcado : la renta total de los hogares en los que la esposa es inactiva es superior a aquellos hogares en los que la esposa es activa. Los hogares para quienes la renta total es mâs desigual son aquellos en los que la mujer es activa y con ninos de edad preescolar. Sobre las rentas francesas, la toma en cuenta de la producciôn doméstica casi élimina la desigualdad entre los hogares con mujer activa y los hogares con mujer inactiva.

Suggested Citation

  • France Caillavet, 1998. "La production domestique des femmes réduit l'inégalité des revenus familiaux," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 311(1), pages 75-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1998_num_311_1_2609
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1998.2609
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1998.2609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1998.2609
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1998_num_311_1_2609
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1998.2609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. P. Hill, 1979. "Do‐It‐Yourself And Gdp," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 25(1), pages 31-39, March.
    2. Goldschmidt-Clermont, Luisella, 1993. "Monetary Valuation of Non-market Productive Time Methodological Considerations," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 39(4), pages 419-433, December.
    3. Anthony F. Shorrocks, 1983. "The Impact of Income Components on the Distribution of Family Incomes," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(2), pages 311-326.
    4. Graham Pyatt, 1990. "Accounting For Time Use," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 36(1), pages 33-52, March.
    5. Marianne A. Ferber & Carole A. Green, 1985. "Homemakers' Imputed Wages: Results of the Heckman Technique Compared with Women's Own Estimates," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 20(1), pages 90-99.
    6. Shorrocks, A F, 1980. "The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(3), pages 613-625, April.
    7. Leibowitz, Arleen, 1974. "Education and Home Production," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(2), pages 243-250, May.
    8. Sheldon Danziger, 1980. "Do Working Wives Increase Family Income Inequality?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 15(3), pages 444-451.
    9. Oli Hawrylshyn, 1977. "Towards A Definition Of Non‐Market Activities," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 23(1), pages 79-96, March.
    10. Bourguignon, Francois, 1979. "Decomposable Income Inequality Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(4), pages 901-920, July.
    11. Lehrer, Evelyn & Nerlove, Marc, 1984. "A Life-Cycle Analysis of Family Income Distribution," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 22(3), pages 360-374, July.
    12. Bonke, Jens, 1992. "Distribution of Economic Resources: Implications of Including Household Production," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 38(3), pages 281-293, September.
    13. Lazear, Edward P & Michael, Robert T, 1980. "Family Size and the Distribution of Real Per Capita Income," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(1), pages 91-107, March.
    14. Stephen P. Jenkins & Nigel C. O'Leary, 1996. "Household Income Plus Household Production: The Distribution Of Extended Income In The U.K," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 42(4), pages 401-419, December.
    15. Jenkins, Stephen P & O'Leary, Nigel C, 1996. "Household Income Plus Household Production: The Distribution of Extended Income in the U.K," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 42(4), pages 401-419, December.
    16. Gronau, Reuben, 1980. "Home Production-A Forgotten Industry," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 62(3), pages 408-416, August.
    17. Layard, Richard & Zabalza, Antoni, 1979. "Family Income Distribution: Explanation and Policy Evaluation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(5), pages 133-161, October.
    18. Jens Bonke, 1992. "Distribution Of Economic Resources: Implications Of Including Household Production," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 38(3), pages 281-293, September.
    19. Clair Vickery, 1977. "The Time-Poor: A New Look at Poverty," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 12(1), pages 27-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaume Allègre & Victor Bart & Laura Castell & Quentin Lippmann & Henri Martin, 2015. "Travail domestique : les couples mono-actifs en font-ils vraiment plus ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 478(1), pages 189-208.
    2. Edith Archambault & Lionel Prouteau, 2010. "Un travail qui ne compte pas ? La valorisation monétaire du bénévolat associatif," Post-Print halshs-00550382, HAL.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6b0m7o66t58vqbcarbtcf8ad2q is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Edith Archambault & Lionel Prouteau, 2010. "Un travail qui ne compte pas ? La valorisation monétaire du bénévolat associatif," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00550382, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ezequiel Uriel & Javier Ferri & Maria Luisa Molto, 2005. "Estimation of an Extended SAM with household production for Spain 1995," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 255-278.
    2. Harley Frazis & Jay Stewart, 2006. "How Does Household Production Affect Earnings Inequality?: Evidence from the American Time Use Survey," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_454, Levy Economics Institute.
    3. Joachim Frick & Markus Grabka & Olaf Groh-Samberg, 2012. "The impact of home production on economic inequality in Germany," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 1143-1169, December.
    4. Harley Frazis & Jay Stewart, 2011. "How does household production affect measured income inequality?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 3-22, January.
    5. Nancy Folbre & Marta Murray-Close & Jooyeoun Suh, 2018. "Equivalence scales for extended income in the U.S," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 189-227, June.
    6. Teixidó Figueras, Jordi & Duro Moreno, Juan Antonio, 2012. "Ecological Footprint Inequality: A methodological review and some results," Working Papers 2072/203168, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    7. Andrea Brandolini & Eliana Viviano, 2016. "Accounting for total work in labour statistics [Der Gesamtbetrag der Arbeit in den Arbeitsmarktstatistiken]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 49(3), pages 199-212, November.
    8. Christos Koutsampelas & Panos Tsakloglou, 2013. "The distribution of full income in Greece," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(4), pages 311-330, March.
    9. Frank Cowell & Carlo Fiorio, 2011. "Inequality decompositions—a reconciliation," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(4), pages 509-528, December.
    10. Arthur Charpentier & Stéphane Mussard, 2011. "Income inequality games," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(4), pages 529-554, December.
    11. Anil Alpman & François Gardes, 2016. "Welfare Analysis of the Allocation of Time During the Great Recession," Post-Print halshs-01159507, HAL.
    12. St鰨ane Mussard & Patrick Richard, 2012. "Linking Yitzhaki's and Dagum's Gini decompositions," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(23), pages 2997-3010, August.
    13. Amin, Shahina & DaVanzo, Julie, 2004. "The impact of wives' earnings on earnings inequality among married-couple households in Malaysia," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 49-70, February.
    14. Frank Cowell & Carlo V. Fiorio, 2010. "GINI DP 4: Inequality Decompositions," GINI Discussion Papers 4, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    15. Michele Giammatteo, 2007. "The bidimensional decomposition of inequality: A nested Theil approach," LIS Working papers 466, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    16. Joachim Merz & Paul Böhm & Derik Burgert, 2005. "Timing, Fragmentation of Work and Income Inequality - An Earnings Treatment Effects Approach," FFB-Discussionpaper 48, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)), LEUPHANA University Lüneburg.
    17. Andrea Brandolini & Eliana Viviano, 2014. "Accounting for total work," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 253, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    18. Carlo Vittorio FIORIO, 2008. "Understanding Italian inequality trends: a simulation-based decomposition," Departmental Working Papers 2008-26, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    19. Maximilian Stockhausen, 2017. "The Distribution of Economic Resources to Children in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 901, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    20. Stockhausen, Maximilian, 2016. "The Impact of Private and Public Childcare Provision on the Distribution of Children's Incomes in Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145638, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1998_num_311_1_2609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.